研究脑电图与 fNIRS 之间的相互作用:大脑连接的多模态网络分析

IF 3.1 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
{"title":"研究脑电图与 fNIRS 之间的相互作用:大脑连接的多模态网络分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The brain is a complex system with functional and structural networks. Different neuroimaging methods have been developed to explore these networks, but each method has its own unique strengths and limitations, depending on the signals they measure. Combining techniques like electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has gained interest, but understanding how the information derived from these modalities is related to each other remains an exciting open question. The multilayer network model has emerged as a promising approach to integrate different sources data. In this study, we investigated the hemodynamic and electrophysiological data captured by fNIRS and EEG to compare brain network topologies derived from each modality, examining how these topologies vary between resting state (RS) and task-related conditions. Additionally, we adopted the multilayer network model to integrate EEG and fNIRS data and evaluate the benefits of combining multiple modalities compared to using a single modality in capturing characteristic brain functioning.</p><p>A small-world network structure was observed in the rest, right motor imagery, and left motor imagery tasks in both modalities. We found that EEG captures faster changes in neural activity, thus providing a more precise estimation of the timing of information transfer between brain regions in RS. fNIRS provides insights into the slower hemodynamic responses associated with longer-lasting and sustained neural processes in cognitive tasks. The multilayer approach outperformed unimodal analyses, offering a richer understanding of brain function. Complementarity between EEG and fNIRS was observed, particularly during tasks, as well as a certain level of redundancy and complementarity between the multimodal and the unimodal approach, which depends on the modality and the specific brain state. Overall, the results highlight differences in how EEG and fNIRS capture brain network topology in RS and tasks and emphasize the value of integrating multiple modalities for a comprehensive view of brain connectivity and function.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877750324002096/pdfft?md5=71eed64dc88649cf2f98e5b6d2bb1fed&pid=1-s2.0-S1877750324002096-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the interaction between EEG and fNIRS: A multimodal network analysis of brain connectivity\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The brain is a complex system with functional and structural networks. Different neuroimaging methods have been developed to explore these networks, but each method has its own unique strengths and limitations, depending on the signals they measure. Combining techniques like electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has gained interest, but understanding how the information derived from these modalities is related to each other remains an exciting open question. The multilayer network model has emerged as a promising approach to integrate different sources data. In this study, we investigated the hemodynamic and electrophysiological data captured by fNIRS and EEG to compare brain network topologies derived from each modality, examining how these topologies vary between resting state (RS) and task-related conditions. Additionally, we adopted the multilayer network model to integrate EEG and fNIRS data and evaluate the benefits of combining multiple modalities compared to using a single modality in capturing characteristic brain functioning.</p><p>A small-world network structure was observed in the rest, right motor imagery, and left motor imagery tasks in both modalities. We found that EEG captures faster changes in neural activity, thus providing a more precise estimation of the timing of information transfer between brain regions in RS. fNIRS provides insights into the slower hemodynamic responses associated with longer-lasting and sustained neural processes in cognitive tasks. The multilayer approach outperformed unimodal analyses, offering a richer understanding of brain function. Complementarity between EEG and fNIRS was observed, particularly during tasks, as well as a certain level of redundancy and complementarity between the multimodal and the unimodal approach, which depends on the modality and the specific brain state. Overall, the results highlight differences in how EEG and fNIRS capture brain network topology in RS and tasks and emphasize the value of integrating multiple modalities for a comprehensive view of brain connectivity and function.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computational Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877750324002096/pdfft?md5=71eed64dc88649cf2f98e5b6d2bb1fed&pid=1-s2.0-S1877750324002096-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877750324002096\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877750324002096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大脑是一个具有功能和结构网络的复杂系统。目前已开发出不同的神经成像方法来探索这些网络,但每种方法都有其独特的优势和局限性,这取决于它们所测量的信号。将脑电图(EEG)和功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)等技术结合起来已引起了人们的兴趣,但了解从这些模式中获得的信息如何相互关联仍是一个令人兴奋的开放性问题。多层网络模型已成为整合不同来源数据的一种有前途的方法。在本研究中,我们调查了 fNIRS 和 EEG 所捕获的血液动力学和电生理学数据,比较了从每种模式中获得的大脑网络拓扑结构,研究了这些拓扑结构在静息状态(RS)和任务相关条件下的差异。此外,我们还采用了多层网络模型来整合脑电图和 fNIRS 数据,并评估了在捕捉大脑功能特征方面,与使用单一模式相比,结合多种模式的益处。在两种模式的静息、右运动想象和左运动想象任务中,我们都观察到了小世界网络结构。我们发现脑电图捕捉到的神经活动变化更快,因此能更精确地估计 RS 中大脑区域之间的信息传递时间。多层方法优于单模态分析,可提供对大脑功能更丰富的理解。观察到脑电图和 fNIRS 之间的互补性,特别是在任务期间,以及多模态和单模态方法之间一定程度的冗余和互补性,这取决于模态和特定的大脑状态。总之,研究结果凸显了脑电图和 fNIRS 在捕捉 RS 和任务中大脑网络拓扑结构方面的差异,并强调了整合多种模式以全面了解大脑连接和功能的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the interaction between EEG and fNIRS: A multimodal network analysis of brain connectivity

The brain is a complex system with functional and structural networks. Different neuroimaging methods have been developed to explore these networks, but each method has its own unique strengths and limitations, depending on the signals they measure. Combining techniques like electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has gained interest, but understanding how the information derived from these modalities is related to each other remains an exciting open question. The multilayer network model has emerged as a promising approach to integrate different sources data. In this study, we investigated the hemodynamic and electrophysiological data captured by fNIRS and EEG to compare brain network topologies derived from each modality, examining how these topologies vary between resting state (RS) and task-related conditions. Additionally, we adopted the multilayer network model to integrate EEG and fNIRS data and evaluate the benefits of combining multiple modalities compared to using a single modality in capturing characteristic brain functioning.

A small-world network structure was observed in the rest, right motor imagery, and left motor imagery tasks in both modalities. We found that EEG captures faster changes in neural activity, thus providing a more precise estimation of the timing of information transfer between brain regions in RS. fNIRS provides insights into the slower hemodynamic responses associated with longer-lasting and sustained neural processes in cognitive tasks. The multilayer approach outperformed unimodal analyses, offering a richer understanding of brain function. Complementarity between EEG and fNIRS was observed, particularly during tasks, as well as a certain level of redundancy and complementarity between the multimodal and the unimodal approach, which depends on the modality and the specific brain state. Overall, the results highlight differences in how EEG and fNIRS capture brain network topology in RS and tasks and emphasize the value of integrating multiple modalities for a comprehensive view of brain connectivity and function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computational Science
Journal of Computational Science COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
227
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Computational Science is a rapidly growing multi- and interdisciplinary field that uses advanced computing and data analysis to understand and solve complex problems. It has reached a level of predictive capability that now firmly complements the traditional pillars of experimentation and theory. The recent advances in experimental techniques such as detectors, on-line sensor networks and high-resolution imaging techniques, have opened up new windows into physical and biological processes at many levels of detail. The resulting data explosion allows for detailed data driven modeling and simulation. This new discipline in science combines computational thinking, modern computational methods, devices and collateral technologies to address problems far beyond the scope of traditional numerical methods. Computational science typically unifies three distinct elements: • Modeling, Algorithms and Simulations (e.g. numerical and non-numerical, discrete and continuous); • Software developed to solve science (e.g., biological, physical, and social), engineering, medicine, and humanities problems; • Computer and information science that develops and optimizes the advanced system hardware, software, networking, and data management components (e.g. problem solving environments).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信