俯卧位通气的急性呼吸窘迫综合征重症患者无反应结局的预测模型:回顾性队列研究

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yuhang Yan , Bingxuan Geng , Jingyi Liang , Yinghong Wen , Junying Bao , Xiangning Zhong , Meijia Chen , Li Liu , Jiaxin Duan , Zhenhua Zeng , Shengli An , Zhongqing Chen , HongBin Hu
{"title":"俯卧位通气的急性呼吸窘迫综合征重症患者无反应结局的预测模型:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Yuhang Yan ,&nbsp;Bingxuan Geng ,&nbsp;Jingyi Liang ,&nbsp;Yinghong Wen ,&nbsp;Junying Bao ,&nbsp;Xiangning Zhong ,&nbsp;Meijia Chen ,&nbsp;Li Liu ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Duan ,&nbsp;Zhenhua Zeng ,&nbsp;Shengli An ,&nbsp;Zhongqing Chen ,&nbsp;HongBin Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to develop a reliable and effective nomogram model to identify high-risk populations with non-response to prone position ventilation (PPV) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included 175 patients with ARDS undergoing PPV. An improvement of ≥ 20 mmHg in the PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> after the first PPV was defined as a 'response'. For the construction of the model, all patients were randomly assigned to the train and validation cohort according to 2:1. Multivariate logistic regression was useed to develop the nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve and calibration curve were assessed to evaluate the efficiency, clinical utility and calibration of the model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall rate of non-response to PPV in ARDS patients was approximately 32.6 %. In the training cohort and validation cohort, the rate are 29.9 % and 34.5 % respectively. Murray score ≥ 2.5 (OR: 4.29), procalcitonin (PCT) ≥ 2 ng/mL (OR: 2.52), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP) ≥ 2000 pg/ml (OR: 2.44), and hemoglobin ≤ 90 g/L (OR: 2.39) were independently associated with the rate of non-response to PPV and combined in prediction model. The model demonstrated good predictive value with AUC of 0.817 and 0.828 in the train and validation cohort. Calibration curve showed good calibration and decision curve analysis indicated favorable clinical utility.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study constructed a risk prediction model for non-response to PPV, which demonstrated good predictive value and clinical utility.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><p>Early identification of prone position response in ARDS is essential for timely alternative treatments, improving patient prognosis and healthcare efficiency. The predictive model included representative indicators of patients with ARDS, encompassing parameters such as the acute lung injury (Murray score), cardiac function (Nt-proBNP), infectious status (PCT), and hemoglobin levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103804"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001897/pdfft?md5=c55b692b82e8a36a6607f76544b13b7f&pid=1-s2.0-S0964339724001897-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prediction model for nonresponsive outcomes in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing prone position ventilation: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Yuhang Yan ,&nbsp;Bingxuan Geng ,&nbsp;Jingyi Liang ,&nbsp;Yinghong Wen ,&nbsp;Junying Bao ,&nbsp;Xiangning Zhong ,&nbsp;Meijia Chen ,&nbsp;Li Liu ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Duan ,&nbsp;Zhenhua Zeng ,&nbsp;Shengli An ,&nbsp;Zhongqing Chen ,&nbsp;HongBin Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to develop a reliable and effective nomogram model to identify high-risk populations with non-response to prone position ventilation (PPV) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included 175 patients with ARDS undergoing PPV. An improvement of ≥ 20 mmHg in the PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> after the first PPV was defined as a 'response'. For the construction of the model, all patients were randomly assigned to the train and validation cohort according to 2:1. Multivariate logistic regression was useed to develop the nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve and calibration curve were assessed to evaluate the efficiency, clinical utility and calibration of the model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall rate of non-response to PPV in ARDS patients was approximately 32.6 %. In the training cohort and validation cohort, the rate are 29.9 % and 34.5 % respectively. Murray score ≥ 2.5 (OR: 4.29), procalcitonin (PCT) ≥ 2 ng/mL (OR: 2.52), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP) ≥ 2000 pg/ml (OR: 2.44), and hemoglobin ≤ 90 g/L (OR: 2.39) were independently associated with the rate of non-response to PPV and combined in prediction model. The model demonstrated good predictive value with AUC of 0.817 and 0.828 in the train and validation cohort. Calibration curve showed good calibration and decision curve analysis indicated favorable clinical utility.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study constructed a risk prediction model for non-response to PPV, which demonstrated good predictive value and clinical utility.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><p>Early identification of prone position response in ARDS is essential for timely alternative treatments, improving patient prognosis and healthcare efficiency. The predictive model included representative indicators of patients with ARDS, encompassing parameters such as the acute lung injury (Murray score), cardiac function (Nt-proBNP), infectious status (PCT), and hemoglobin levels.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103804\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001897/pdfft?md5=c55b692b82e8a36a6607f76544b13b7f&pid=1-s2.0-S0964339724001897-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001897\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001897","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在开发一种可靠有效的提名图模型,用于识别急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者中对俯卧位通气(PPV)无反应的高危人群。首次 PPV 后 PaO2/FiO2 改善≥ 20 mmHg 即为 "应答"。在构建模型时,所有患者按 2:1 随机分配到训练组和验证组。使用多变量逻辑回归来建立提名图。结果 ARDS 患者对 PPV 无应答的总比率约为 32.6%。在训练队列和验证队列中,未响应率分别为 29.9% 和 34.5%。Murray 评分≥ 2.5(OR:4.29)、降钙素原(PCT)≥ 2 ng/mL(OR:2.52)、N-末端前 B 型钠尿肽(Nt-proBNP)≥ 2000 pg/ml(OR:2.44)和血红蛋白≤ 90 g/L(OR:2.39)与 PPV 无应答率独立相关,并合并到预测模型中。该模型具有良好的预测价值,在训练组和验证组中的 AUC 分别为 0.817 和 0.828。结论本研究构建了一个对 PPV 无应答的风险预测模型,该模型显示了良好的预测价值和临床实用性。对临床实践的意义早期识别 ARDS 患者的俯卧位反应对于及时替代治疗、改善患者预后和提高医疗效率至关重要。该预测模型包括 ARDS 患者的代表性指标,包括急性肺损伤(Murray 评分)、心脏功能(Nt-proBNP)、感染状态(PCT)和血红蛋白水平等参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A prediction model for nonresponsive outcomes in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing prone position ventilation: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

This study aimed to develop a reliable and effective nomogram model to identify high-risk populations with non-response to prone position ventilation (PPV) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 175 patients with ARDS undergoing PPV. An improvement of ≥ 20 mmHg in the PaO2/FiO2 after the first PPV was defined as a 'response'. For the construction of the model, all patients were randomly assigned to the train and validation cohort according to 2:1. Multivariate logistic regression was useed to develop the nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve and calibration curve were assessed to evaluate the efficiency, clinical utility and calibration of the model.

Results

The overall rate of non-response to PPV in ARDS patients was approximately 32.6 %. In the training cohort and validation cohort, the rate are 29.9 % and 34.5 % respectively. Murray score ≥ 2.5 (OR: 4.29), procalcitonin (PCT) ≥ 2 ng/mL (OR: 2.52), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (Nt-proBNP) ≥ 2000 pg/ml (OR: 2.44), and hemoglobin ≤ 90 g/L (OR: 2.39) were independently associated with the rate of non-response to PPV and combined in prediction model. The model demonstrated good predictive value with AUC of 0.817 and 0.828 in the train and validation cohort. Calibration curve showed good calibration and decision curve analysis indicated favorable clinical utility.

Conclusions

This study constructed a risk prediction model for non-response to PPV, which demonstrated good predictive value and clinical utility.

Implications for clinical practice

Early identification of prone position response in ARDS is essential for timely alternative treatments, improving patient prognosis and healthcare efficiency. The predictive model included representative indicators of patients with ARDS, encompassing parameters such as the acute lung injury (Murray score), cardiac function (Nt-proBNP), infectious status (PCT), and hemoglobin levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信