关于直接评估、成对比较法和最佳-最差法精确度的比较研究

IF 6.7 2区管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT

Omega-international Journal of Management Science Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2024.103175

{"title":"关于直接评估、成对比较法和最佳-最差法精确度的比较研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this paper is to design, carry out and analyze an experiment with over 100 respondents to measure the precision of the respondents when they compare (by evaluation) the areas of nine geometric figures and five distances between cities by using direct evaluations, Pairwise Comparisons Method and Best-Worst Method. The outcomes of the experiment indicate that the direct evaluations are the most imprecise and that there is not statistically significant difference between Best-Worst Method and Pairwise Comparisons Method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on precision of direct evaluations, the Pairwise Comparisons Method and the Best-Worst Method\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this paper is to design, carry out and analyze an experiment with over 100 respondents to measure the precision of the respondents when they compare (by evaluation) the areas of nine geometric figures and five distances between cities by using direct evaluations, Pairwise Comparisons Method and Best-Worst Method. The outcomes of the experiment indicate that the direct evaluations are the most imprecise and that there is not statistically significant difference between Best-Worst Method and Pairwise Comparisons Method.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001403\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在设计、实施和分析一项由 100 多名受访者参加的实验，以测量受访者在使用直接评价法、成对比较法和最佳--最差法（通过评价）比较九个几何图形的面积和五个城市之间的距离时的精确度。实验结果表明，直接评价法最不精确，而最佳-最差法和成双比较法在统计上没有显著差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A comparative study on precision of direct evaluations, the Pairwise Comparisons Method and the Best-Worst Method

The aim of this paper is to design, carry out and analyze an experiment with over 100 respondents to measure the precision of the respondents when they compare (by evaluation) the areas of nine geometric figures and five distances between cities by using direct evaluations, Pairwise Comparisons Method and Best-Worst Method. The outcomes of the experiment indicate that the direct evaluations are the most imprecise and that there is not statistically significant difference between Best-Worst Method and Pairwise Comparisons Method.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学

CiteScore

13.80

自引率

11.60%

发文量

130

审稿时长

56 days

期刊介绍： Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.