混合型肱骨反向肩关节置换术:在评估肱骨近端应力屏蔽和相关临床结果时采用骨移植和骨骺固定术的前瞻性研究

Q4 Medicine
Roberto Pareyon MD , Helen Ingoe MBBS, FRCS Eng , Mohammad N. Jomaa MD , Kristine Italia FPOA , Jashint Maharaj FRSPH , Sarah L. Whitehouse PhD , Kenneth Cutbush MBBS, FRACS, FAOrthoA , Ashish Gupta MBBS, MSc, FRACS, FAOrthoA
{"title":"混合型肱骨反向肩关节置换术:在评估肱骨近端应力屏蔽和相关临床结果时采用骨移植和骨骺固定术的前瞻性研究","authors":"Roberto Pareyon MD ,&nbsp;Helen Ingoe MBBS, FRCS Eng ,&nbsp;Mohammad N. Jomaa MD ,&nbsp;Kristine Italia FPOA ,&nbsp;Jashint Maharaj FRSPH ,&nbsp;Sarah L. Whitehouse PhD ,&nbsp;Kenneth Cutbush MBBS, FRACS, FAOrthoA ,&nbsp;Ashish Gupta MBBS, MSc, FRACS, FAOrthoA","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A significant proportion of revisions after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is attributed to the humeral component. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the hybrid humerus technique for RSA using a Grammont-style humeral prosthesis in an onlay fashion with metaphyseal bone impaction grafting technique and undersized stem to avoid humeral stress shielding, notching, and loosening.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a prospective case series of patients who underwent RSA using the hybrid humerus technique with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Key steps of this technique include the use of undersized Grammont-style stem, impaction bone grafting of the proximal 5 cm of the humerus, and adjusting the height and offset of the stem depending on the patient stature, desired lateralization and distalization, and joint and soft tissue tension. Radiographic assessments were performed immediately after surgery, and at 1 and 2 years after surgery. These included assessment of metaphyseal and diaphyseal filling ratio, cortical narrowing, radiolucent lines, cortical lucencies, spot welding, scapular notching, and stem alignment. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative clinical assessments included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant-Murley Score, University of California Los Angeles score, visual analog scale for pain, and active range of motion. Correlation between the filling ratios and clinical outcomes were also evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-one patients were included in the study. The average metaphyseal and diaphyseal filling ratio on the postoperative X-ray was 0.66 and 0.54, and 0.67 and 0.54 at 2 years, respectively. Stress shielding was graded as none in 24 (40.7%), mild in 33 (55.9%), and moderate in 2 (3.4%). No stem had a change in position of more than 5°. At 2 years of follow-up, no humeral implant loosening was noted, with only 2 (3.4%) of the stems at risk of loosening. Thirty-nine (66.1%) had no notching, 14 (23.7%) were graded as mild, and 6 (10.2%) had moderate signs of notching. All clinical assessments significantly improved at 2 years (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), with a weak negative correlation between visual analog scale and metaphyseal filling ratio (r = −0.268, <em>P</em> = .036) but none between diaphyseal filling ratio and clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The hybrid humerus technique of metaphyseal bone grafting with a low filling ratio stem presents a promising solution for reducing humeral complications in RSA. This technique demonstrates a low incidence of stress shielding and loosening, with excellent clinical outcomes at 2 years.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 797-806"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000713/pdfft?md5=ce0f7ece85c74763621fecd2b7f9dc06&pid=1-s2.0-S1045452724000713-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The hybrid humerus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study of bone grafting and metaphyseal fixation with undersized stem in the assessment of proximal humeral stress shielding and associated clinical outcome\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Pareyon MD ,&nbsp;Helen Ingoe MBBS, FRCS Eng ,&nbsp;Mohammad N. Jomaa MD ,&nbsp;Kristine Italia FPOA ,&nbsp;Jashint Maharaj FRSPH ,&nbsp;Sarah L. Whitehouse PhD ,&nbsp;Kenneth Cutbush MBBS, FRACS, FAOrthoA ,&nbsp;Ashish Gupta MBBS, MSc, FRACS, FAOrthoA\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2024.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A significant proportion of revisions after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is attributed to the humeral component. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the hybrid humerus technique for RSA using a Grammont-style humeral prosthesis in an onlay fashion with metaphyseal bone impaction grafting technique and undersized stem to avoid humeral stress shielding, notching, and loosening.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a prospective case series of patients who underwent RSA using the hybrid humerus technique with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Key steps of this technique include the use of undersized Grammont-style stem, impaction bone grafting of the proximal 5 cm of the humerus, and adjusting the height and offset of the stem depending on the patient stature, desired lateralization and distalization, and joint and soft tissue tension. Radiographic assessments were performed immediately after surgery, and at 1 and 2 years after surgery. These included assessment of metaphyseal and diaphyseal filling ratio, cortical narrowing, radiolucent lines, cortical lucencies, spot welding, scapular notching, and stem alignment. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative clinical assessments included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant-Murley Score, University of California Los Angeles score, visual analog scale for pain, and active range of motion. Correlation between the filling ratios and clinical outcomes were also evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-one patients were included in the study. The average metaphyseal and diaphyseal filling ratio on the postoperative X-ray was 0.66 and 0.54, and 0.67 and 0.54 at 2 years, respectively. Stress shielding was graded as none in 24 (40.7%), mild in 33 (55.9%), and moderate in 2 (3.4%). No stem had a change in position of more than 5°. At 2 years of follow-up, no humeral implant loosening was noted, with only 2 (3.4%) of the stems at risk of loosening. Thirty-nine (66.1%) had no notching, 14 (23.7%) were graded as mild, and 6 (10.2%) had moderate signs of notching. All clinical assessments significantly improved at 2 years (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), with a weak negative correlation between visual analog scale and metaphyseal filling ratio (r = −0.268, <em>P</em> = .036) but none between diaphyseal filling ratio and clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The hybrid humerus technique of metaphyseal bone grafting with a low filling ratio stem presents a promising solution for reducing humeral complications in RSA. This technique demonstrates a low incidence of stress shielding and loosening, with excellent clinical outcomes at 2 years.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 797-806\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000713/pdfft?md5=ce0f7ece85c74763621fecd2b7f9dc06&pid=1-s2.0-S1045452724000713-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景反向肩关节置换术(RSA)术后翻修的很大一部分原因是肱骨组件。本研究的目的是评估混合肱骨技术在RSA中的放射学和临床效果,该技术采用Grammont式肱骨假体,以嵌体方式植入,并采用骨骺骨植入技术和过小的骨干,以避免肱骨应力屏蔽、切口和松动。该技术的关键步骤包括:使用尺寸过小的格拉蒙式骨干,在肱骨近端5厘米处进行植入式植骨,并根据患者的身材、所需的外侧化和远端化以及关节和软组织张力调整骨干的高度和偏移量。术后立即进行放射学评估,术后1年和2年进行放射学评估。这些评估包括骺端和骺端充填比、皮质变窄、放射线、皮质透亮、点焊、肩胛骨切迹和骨干对齐情况。术前和术后两年的临床评估包括美国肩肘外科医生评分、Constant-Murley评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校评分、疼痛视觉模拟量表和活动范围。研究还评估了填充率与临床结果之间的相关性。术后 X 光片上骺端和骺端平均填充率分别为 0.66 和 0.54,2 年后分别为 0.67 和 0.54。应力屏蔽分为无应力屏蔽 24 例(40.7%)、轻度屏蔽 33 例(55.9%)和中度屏蔽 2 例(3.4%)。没有一个骨干的位置变化超过5°。在2年的随访中,没有发现肱骨假体松动,只有2个(3.4%)假体柄有松动的风险。39例(66.1%)患者未出现切迹,14例(23.7%)患者出现轻度切迹,6例(10.2%)患者出现中度切迹。所有临床评估结果在2年后均有明显改善(P <.001),视觉模拟量表与骺端填充率之间呈弱负相关(r = -0.268,P = .036),但骺端填充率与临床结果之间无相关性。该技术应力屏蔽和松动的发生率较低,2年后的临床效果极佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The hybrid humerus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study of bone grafting and metaphyseal fixation with undersized stem in the assessment of proximal humeral stress shielding and associated clinical outcome

Background

A significant proportion of revisions after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is attributed to the humeral component. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the hybrid humerus technique for RSA using a Grammont-style humeral prosthesis in an onlay fashion with metaphyseal bone impaction grafting technique and undersized stem to avoid humeral stress shielding, notching, and loosening.

Methods

This is a prospective case series of patients who underwent RSA using the hybrid humerus technique with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Key steps of this technique include the use of undersized Grammont-style stem, impaction bone grafting of the proximal 5 cm of the humerus, and adjusting the height and offset of the stem depending on the patient stature, desired lateralization and distalization, and joint and soft tissue tension. Radiographic assessments were performed immediately after surgery, and at 1 and 2 years after surgery. These included assessment of metaphyseal and diaphyseal filling ratio, cortical narrowing, radiolucent lines, cortical lucencies, spot welding, scapular notching, and stem alignment. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative clinical assessments included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant-Murley Score, University of California Los Angeles score, visual analog scale for pain, and active range of motion. Correlation between the filling ratios and clinical outcomes were also evaluated.

Results

Sixty-one patients were included in the study. The average metaphyseal and diaphyseal filling ratio on the postoperative X-ray was 0.66 and 0.54, and 0.67 and 0.54 at 2 years, respectively. Stress shielding was graded as none in 24 (40.7%), mild in 33 (55.9%), and moderate in 2 (3.4%). No stem had a change in position of more than 5°. At 2 years of follow-up, no humeral implant loosening was noted, with only 2 (3.4%) of the stems at risk of loosening. Thirty-nine (66.1%) had no notching, 14 (23.7%) were graded as mild, and 6 (10.2%) had moderate signs of notching. All clinical assessments significantly improved at 2 years (P < .001), with a weak negative correlation between visual analog scale and metaphyseal filling ratio (r = −0.268, P = .036) but none between diaphyseal filling ratio and clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

The hybrid humerus technique of metaphyseal bone grafting with a low filling ratio stem presents a promising solution for reducing humeral complications in RSA. This technique demonstrates a low incidence of stress shielding and loosening, with excellent clinical outcomes at 2 years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信