确定悉尼岩牡蛎(Saccostrea glomerata)珊瑚礁恢复的最佳做法,提高生态效益。

IF 2.3 Q2 ECOLOGY
Victoria J Cole, David Harasti, S Kirk Dahle, Kylie Russell
{"title":"确定悉尼岩牡蛎(Saccostrea glomerata)珊瑚礁恢复的最佳做法,提高生态效益。","authors":"Victoria J Cole, David Harasti, S Kirk Dahle, Kylie Russell","doi":"10.1186/s12862-024-02296-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shellfish reef restoration is relatively new in Australia, particularly to intertidal estuarine environments. In late 2019/early 2020 the first large-scale shellfish reef restoration project of the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata was undertaken in the Myall and Karuah Rivers, Port Stephens, on the mid north coast of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The present study aimed to determine whether locally sourced clean conspecific oyster shells, and/or locally quarried rocks were better for natural recruitment of natural S. glomerata for large-scale oyster reef restoration, and subsequent recruitment of fishes and invertebrates. Over two years, recruitment of S. glomerata spat, and associated fishes and invertebrates were assessed on reefs made of: (1) rock, and (2) rock and shell.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (± SE) density of oyster spat on rock reefs (Myall River: 1790 ± 48, Karuah River: 1928 ± 68) was significantly greater (Myall River: ANOVA Si: MS <sub>2, 18</sub> = 31080167, F = 96.05, P < 0.001, Karuah River: ANOVA Si x Ti: MS <sub>18, 270</sub> = 2965449, F = 5.99, P < 0.001) than on rock and shell reefs (Myall River: 840 ± 40, Karuah River: 1505 ± 75). Rock reefs had significantly greater densities (Myall River: ANOVA Si x Ti: MS 18, 270 = 15657, F = 2.71, P < 0.001, Karuah River: ANOVA Si x Ti: MS 18, 270 = 20322, F = 5.25, P < 0.001) of the most abundant invertebrate, Bembicium auratum (Myall River: 85 ± 9, Karuah River: 100 ± 8) than reefs of rock and shell (Myall River: 59 ± 8, Karuah River: 44 ± 5), but there was no significant difference in the diversity and relative abundance of the most abundant species of fish, Acanthopagrus australis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that using locally sourced rock is better for S. glomerata recruitment than shells. Although shell might have benefits that were not investigated in the present study, such as elicit greater social licence for oyster reef restoration projects, but as shown here, it may not be beneficial from an ecological perspective. With the global expansion of the range of different native species of reef oysters for restoration, the appropriate material used for reef bases needs to be chosen for a specific species and purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":93910,"journal":{"name":"BMC ecology and evolution","volume":"24 1","pages":"114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining the best practice for Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata, reef restoration and enhanced ecological benefits.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria J Cole, David Harasti, S Kirk Dahle, Kylie Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12862-024-02296-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shellfish reef restoration is relatively new in Australia, particularly to intertidal estuarine environments. In late 2019/early 2020 the first large-scale shellfish reef restoration project of the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata was undertaken in the Myall and Karuah Rivers, Port Stephens, on the mid north coast of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The present study aimed to determine whether locally sourced clean conspecific oyster shells, and/or locally quarried rocks were better for natural recruitment of natural S. glomerata for large-scale oyster reef restoration, and subsequent recruitment of fishes and invertebrates. Over two years, recruitment of S. glomerata spat, and associated fishes and invertebrates were assessed on reefs made of: (1) rock, and (2) rock and shell.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (± SE) density of oyster spat on rock reefs (Myall River: 1790 ± 48, Karuah River: 1928 ± 68) was significantly greater (Myall River: ANOVA Si: MS <sub>2, 18</sub> = 31080167, F = 96.05, P < 0.001, Karuah River: ANOVA Si x Ti: MS <sub>18, 270</sub> = 2965449, F = 5.99, P < 0.001) than on rock and shell reefs (Myall River: 840 ± 40, Karuah River: 1505 ± 75). Rock reefs had significantly greater densities (Myall River: ANOVA Si x Ti: MS 18, 270 = 15657, F = 2.71, P < 0.001, Karuah River: ANOVA Si x Ti: MS 18, 270 = 20322, F = 5.25, P < 0.001) of the most abundant invertebrate, Bembicium auratum (Myall River: 85 ± 9, Karuah River: 100 ± 8) than reefs of rock and shell (Myall River: 59 ± 8, Karuah River: 44 ± 5), but there was no significant difference in the diversity and relative abundance of the most abundant species of fish, Acanthopagrus australis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that using locally sourced rock is better for S. glomerata recruitment than shells. Although shell might have benefits that were not investigated in the present study, such as elicit greater social licence for oyster reef restoration projects, but as shown here, it may not be beneficial from an ecological perspective. With the global expansion of the range of different native species of reef oysters for restoration, the appropriate material used for reef bases needs to be chosen for a specific species and purpose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC ecology and evolution\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344442/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC ecology and evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-024-02296-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC ecology and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-024-02296-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:贝类珊瑚礁修复在澳大利亚是一个相对较新的项目,尤其是在潮间带河口环境中。2019 年底/2020 年初,澳大利亚新南威尔士州(新南威尔士州)中北海岸的斯蒂芬斯港 Myall 河和 Karuah 河开展了首个大规模的悉尼岩牡蛎(Saccostrea glomerata)贝礁修复项目。本研究的目的是确定,在大规模牡蛎礁恢复过程中,当地来源的干净同种牡蛎壳和/或当地开采的岩石是否更有利于天然岩牡蛎的自然繁殖,以及随后鱼类和无脊椎动物的繁殖。在两年的时间里,对由以下材料制成的礁石进行了评估:(1) 岩石;(2) 岩石和贝壳:结果:岩礁上牡蛎幼体的平均密度(±SE)(迈尔河:1790 ± 48,卡鲁阿河:1928 ± 68)明显高于其他岩礁(迈尔河:1790 ± 48,卡鲁阿河:1928 ± 68):方差分析 Si:MS 2,18 = 31080167,F = 96.05,P 18,270 = 2965449,F = 5.99,P 结论:这项研究表明,与贝壳相比,使用当地的岩石更有利于团扇藻的繁殖。虽然贝壳可能具有本研究未调查到的益处,如为牡蛎礁恢复项目带来更大的社会许可,但正如本文所示,从生态学角度来看,贝壳可能并无益处。随着全球范围内用于恢复的不同本地物种牡蛎礁范围的扩大,需要针对特定物种和目的选择合适的礁基材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Determining the best practice for Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata, reef restoration and enhanced ecological benefits.

Determining the best practice for Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata, reef restoration and enhanced ecological benefits.

Background: Shellfish reef restoration is relatively new in Australia, particularly to intertidal estuarine environments. In late 2019/early 2020 the first large-scale shellfish reef restoration project of the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata was undertaken in the Myall and Karuah Rivers, Port Stephens, on the mid north coast of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The present study aimed to determine whether locally sourced clean conspecific oyster shells, and/or locally quarried rocks were better for natural recruitment of natural S. glomerata for large-scale oyster reef restoration, and subsequent recruitment of fishes and invertebrates. Over two years, recruitment of S. glomerata spat, and associated fishes and invertebrates were assessed on reefs made of: (1) rock, and (2) rock and shell.

Results: The mean (± SE) density of oyster spat on rock reefs (Myall River: 1790 ± 48, Karuah River: 1928 ± 68) was significantly greater (Myall River: ANOVA Si: MS 2, 18 = 31080167, F = 96.05, P < 0.001, Karuah River: ANOVA Si x Ti: MS 18, 270 = 2965449, F = 5.99, P < 0.001) than on rock and shell reefs (Myall River: 840 ± 40, Karuah River: 1505 ± 75). Rock reefs had significantly greater densities (Myall River: ANOVA Si x Ti: MS 18, 270 = 15657, F = 2.71, P < 0.001, Karuah River: ANOVA Si x Ti: MS 18, 270 = 20322, F = 5.25, P < 0.001) of the most abundant invertebrate, Bembicium auratum (Myall River: 85 ± 9, Karuah River: 100 ± 8) than reefs of rock and shell (Myall River: 59 ± 8, Karuah River: 44 ± 5), but there was no significant difference in the diversity and relative abundance of the most abundant species of fish, Acanthopagrus australis.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that using locally sourced rock is better for S. glomerata recruitment than shells. Although shell might have benefits that were not investigated in the present study, such as elicit greater social licence for oyster reef restoration projects, but as shown here, it may not be beneficial from an ecological perspective. With the global expansion of the range of different native species of reef oysters for restoration, the appropriate material used for reef bases needs to be chosen for a specific species and purpose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信