Sabrina Mangal, Maryam Hyder, Kate Zarzuela, William McDonald, Ruth M Masterson Creber, Ian M Kronish, Stefan Konigorski, Mathew S Maurer, Monika M Safford, Mark S Lachs, Parag Goyal
{"title":"\"它吸引你的眼睛和大脑\":为心力衰竭患者的共同决策完善可视化。","authors":"Sabrina Mangal, Maryam Hyder, Kate Zarzuela, William McDonald, Ruth M Masterson Creber, Ian M Kronish, Stefan Konigorski, Mathew S Maurer, Monika M Safford, Mark S Lachs, Parag Goyal","doi":"10.1055/a-2402-5832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> N-of-1 trials have emerged as a personalized approach to patient-centered care, where patients can compare evidence-based treatments using their own data. However, little is known about optimal methods to present individual-level data from medication-related N-of-1 trials to patients to promote decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> We conducted qualitative interviews with patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction undergoing N-of-1 trials to iterate, refine, and optimize a patient-facing data visualization tool for displaying the results of N-of-1 medication trials. The goal of optimizing this tool was to promote patients' understanding of their individual health information and to ultimately facilitate shared decision-making about continuing or discontinuing their medication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We conducted 32 semistructured qualitative interviews with 9 participants over the course of their participation in N-of-1 trials. The N-of-1 trials were conducted to facilitate a comparison of continuing versus discontinuing a β-blocker. Interviews were conducted in person or over the phone after each treatment period to evaluate participant perspectives on a data visualization tool prototype. Data were coded using directed content analysis by two independent reviewers and included a third reviewer to reach a consensus when needed. Major themes were extracted and iteratively incorporated into the patient-facing data visualization tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Nine participants provided feedback on how their data were displayed in the visualization tool. After qualitative analysis, three major themes emerged that informed our final interface. Participants preferred: (1) clearly stated individual symptom scores, (2) a reference image with labels to guide their interpretation of symptom information, and (3) qualitative language over numbers alone conveying the meaning of changes in their scores (e.g., better, worse).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Feedback informed the design of a patient-facing data visualization tool for medication-related N-of-1 trials. Future work should include usability and comprehension testing of this interface on a larger scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"1013-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"It Attracts Your Eyes and Brain\\\": Refining Visualizations for Shared Decision-Making with Heart Failure Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Mangal, Maryam Hyder, Kate Zarzuela, William McDonald, Ruth M Masterson Creber, Ian M Kronish, Stefan Konigorski, Mathew S Maurer, Monika M Safford, Mark S Lachs, Parag Goyal\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2402-5832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> N-of-1 trials have emerged as a personalized approach to patient-centered care, where patients can compare evidence-based treatments using their own data. However, little is known about optimal methods to present individual-level data from medication-related N-of-1 trials to patients to promote decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> We conducted qualitative interviews with patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction undergoing N-of-1 trials to iterate, refine, and optimize a patient-facing data visualization tool for displaying the results of N-of-1 medication trials. The goal of optimizing this tool was to promote patients' understanding of their individual health information and to ultimately facilitate shared decision-making about continuing or discontinuing their medication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We conducted 32 semistructured qualitative interviews with 9 participants over the course of their participation in N-of-1 trials. The N-of-1 trials were conducted to facilitate a comparison of continuing versus discontinuing a β-blocker. Interviews were conducted in person or over the phone after each treatment period to evaluate participant perspectives on a data visualization tool prototype. Data were coded using directed content analysis by two independent reviewers and included a third reviewer to reach a consensus when needed. Major themes were extracted and iteratively incorporated into the patient-facing data visualization tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Nine participants provided feedback on how their data were displayed in the visualization tool. After qualitative analysis, three major themes emerged that informed our final interface. Participants preferred: (1) clearly stated individual symptom scores, (2) a reference image with labels to guide their interpretation of symptom information, and (3) qualitative language over numbers alone conveying the meaning of changes in their scores (e.g., better, worse).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Feedback informed the design of a patient-facing data visualization tool for medication-related N-of-1 trials. Future work should include usability and comprehension testing of this interface on a larger scale.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1013-1024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2402-5832\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2402-5832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
"It Attracts Your Eyes and Brain": Refining Visualizations for Shared Decision-Making with Heart Failure Patients.
Background: N-of-1 trials have emerged as a personalized approach to patient-centered care, where patients can compare evidence-based treatments using their own data. However, little is known about optimal methods to present individual-level data from medication-related N-of-1 trials to patients to promote decision-making.
Objectives: We conducted qualitative interviews with patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction undergoing N-of-1 trials to iterate, refine, and optimize a patient-facing data visualization tool for displaying the results of N-of-1 medication trials. The goal of optimizing this tool was to promote patients' understanding of their individual health information and to ultimately facilitate shared decision-making about continuing or discontinuing their medication.
Methods: We conducted 32 semistructured qualitative interviews with 9 participants over the course of their participation in N-of-1 trials. The N-of-1 trials were conducted to facilitate a comparison of continuing versus discontinuing a β-blocker. Interviews were conducted in person or over the phone after each treatment period to evaluate participant perspectives on a data visualization tool prototype. Data were coded using directed content analysis by two independent reviewers and included a third reviewer to reach a consensus when needed. Major themes were extracted and iteratively incorporated into the patient-facing data visualization tool.
Results: Nine participants provided feedback on how their data were displayed in the visualization tool. After qualitative analysis, three major themes emerged that informed our final interface. Participants preferred: (1) clearly stated individual symptom scores, (2) a reference image with labels to guide their interpretation of symptom information, and (3) qualitative language over numbers alone conveying the meaning of changes in their scores (e.g., better, worse).
Conclusion: Feedback informed the design of a patient-facing data visualization tool for medication-related N-of-1 trials. Future work should include usability and comprehension testing of this interface on a larger scale.
期刊介绍:
ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.