{"title":"结合粪便免疫化学检验、DNA 检验和年龄的新指标可提高晚期大肠腺瘤的检测率。","authors":"Yukari Inoue, Akiyo Ishiguro, Yutaka Suehiro, Yuki Kunimune, Yuko Yamaoka, Shinichi Hashimoto, Katsuhiko Nakamura, Atsushi Goto, Koichi Hamabe, Toshihiko Matsumoto, Shinobu Tomochika, Shingo Higaki, Ikuei Fujii, Chieko Suzuki, Michiko Koga, Takeya Tsutsumi, Lay Ahyoung Lim, Yasuo Matsubara, Hiroshi Yotsuyanagi, Hiroaki Nagano, Naoki Yamamoto, Isao Sakaida, Taro Takami, Mitsuaki Nishioka, Takahiro Yamasaki","doi":"10.1111/cas.16322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT) is a widely used screening test for colorectal cancer, it is not sensitive enough to detect advanced colorectal adenoma. To address this issue, we performed this study to investigate whether combining the FIT and fecal DNA testing of methylated somatostatin (<i>SST</i>) could improve diagnostic performance for advanced colorectal adenoma. We collected feces from 79 healthy subjects with negative results on colonoscopy, 43 patients with non-advanced colorectal adenoma, 117 patients with advanced colorectal adenoma, and 126 patients with colorectal cancer. After fecal DNA was incubated with methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes, <i>SST</i> methylation levels were measured by droplet digital PCR. Using logistic multivariate analysis, we established a prediction formula for detecting colorectal neoplasia and named it the FAMS (FIT, age, methylated <i>SST</i>) index. The diagnostic performance of a single use of FIT for advanced colorectal adenoma showed a sensitivity of 29.1% (34/117) and specificity of 89.3% (109/122). In contrast, the FAMS index showed a sensitivity of 56.4% (66/117) at a similar specificity point of 91.0% (111/122). Furthermore, even at the higher specificity point of 94.3% (115/122), the sensitivity was still higher than that of FIT, reaching 42.7% (50/117). As the FAMS index showed better diagnostic performance for advanced colorectal adenoma than a single use of FIT, the FAMS index could be a promising tool for detecting advanced colorectal adenoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":9580,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Science","volume":"115 11","pages":"3682-3694"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel index combining fecal immunochemical test, DNA test, and age improves detection of advanced colorectal adenoma\",\"authors\":\"Yukari Inoue, Akiyo Ishiguro, Yutaka Suehiro, Yuki Kunimune, Yuko Yamaoka, Shinichi Hashimoto, Katsuhiko Nakamura, Atsushi Goto, Koichi Hamabe, Toshihiko Matsumoto, Shinobu Tomochika, Shingo Higaki, Ikuei Fujii, Chieko Suzuki, Michiko Koga, Takeya Tsutsumi, Lay Ahyoung Lim, Yasuo Matsubara, Hiroshi Yotsuyanagi, Hiroaki Nagano, Naoki Yamamoto, Isao Sakaida, Taro Takami, Mitsuaki Nishioka, Takahiro Yamasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cas.16322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT) is a widely used screening test for colorectal cancer, it is not sensitive enough to detect advanced colorectal adenoma. To address this issue, we performed this study to investigate whether combining the FIT and fecal DNA testing of methylated somatostatin (<i>SST</i>) could improve diagnostic performance for advanced colorectal adenoma. We collected feces from 79 healthy subjects with negative results on colonoscopy, 43 patients with non-advanced colorectal adenoma, 117 patients with advanced colorectal adenoma, and 126 patients with colorectal cancer. After fecal DNA was incubated with methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes, <i>SST</i> methylation levels were measured by droplet digital PCR. Using logistic multivariate analysis, we established a prediction formula for detecting colorectal neoplasia and named it the FAMS (FIT, age, methylated <i>SST</i>) index. The diagnostic performance of a single use of FIT for advanced colorectal adenoma showed a sensitivity of 29.1% (34/117) and specificity of 89.3% (109/122). In contrast, the FAMS index showed a sensitivity of 56.4% (66/117) at a similar specificity point of 91.0% (111/122). Furthermore, even at the higher specificity point of 94.3% (115/122), the sensitivity was still higher than that of FIT, reaching 42.7% (50/117). As the FAMS index showed better diagnostic performance for advanced colorectal adenoma than a single use of FIT, the FAMS index could be a promising tool for detecting advanced colorectal adenoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Science\",\"volume\":\"115 11\",\"pages\":\"3682-3694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531960/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cas.16322\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cas.16322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A novel index combining fecal immunochemical test, DNA test, and age improves detection of advanced colorectal adenoma
Although the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT) is a widely used screening test for colorectal cancer, it is not sensitive enough to detect advanced colorectal adenoma. To address this issue, we performed this study to investigate whether combining the FIT and fecal DNA testing of methylated somatostatin (SST) could improve diagnostic performance for advanced colorectal adenoma. We collected feces from 79 healthy subjects with negative results on colonoscopy, 43 patients with non-advanced colorectal adenoma, 117 patients with advanced colorectal adenoma, and 126 patients with colorectal cancer. After fecal DNA was incubated with methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes, SST methylation levels were measured by droplet digital PCR. Using logistic multivariate analysis, we established a prediction formula for detecting colorectal neoplasia and named it the FAMS (FIT, age, methylated SST) index. The diagnostic performance of a single use of FIT for advanced colorectal adenoma showed a sensitivity of 29.1% (34/117) and specificity of 89.3% (109/122). In contrast, the FAMS index showed a sensitivity of 56.4% (66/117) at a similar specificity point of 91.0% (111/122). Furthermore, even at the higher specificity point of 94.3% (115/122), the sensitivity was still higher than that of FIT, reaching 42.7% (50/117). As the FAMS index showed better diagnostic performance for advanced colorectal adenoma than a single use of FIT, the FAMS index could be a promising tool for detecting advanced colorectal adenoma.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Science (formerly Japanese Journal of Cancer Research) is a monthly publication of the Japanese Cancer Association. First published in 1907, the Journal continues to publish original articles, editorials, and letters to the editor, describing original research in the fields of basic, translational and clinical cancer research. The Journal also accepts reports and case reports.
Cancer Science aims to present highly significant and timely findings that have a significant clinical impact on oncologists or that may alter the disease concept of a tumor. The Journal will not publish case reports that describe a rare tumor or condition without new findings to be added to previous reports; combination of different tumors without new suggestive findings for oncological research; remarkable effect of already known treatments without suggestive data to explain the exceptional result. Review articles may also be published.