从行业角度看评估从药物产品中去除二氧化钛 (TiO2) 的体内影响所面临的挑战。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Andreas Abend , Diana Sperger , Dorys Argelia Diaz , Ruiqiong Guo , Regina Reul , Sy-Juen Wu
{"title":"从行业角度看评估从药物产品中去除二氧化钛 (TiO2) 的体内影响所面临的挑战。","authors":"Andreas Abend ,&nbsp;Diana Sperger ,&nbsp;Dorys Argelia Diaz ,&nbsp;Ruiqiong Guo ,&nbsp;Regina Reul ,&nbsp;Sy-Juen Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.xphs.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The European Commission (EC) has tasked the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide a recommendation towards the acceptability of titanium dioxide (TiO<sub>2</sub>) in pharmaceutical products by early 2024 to inform on final decision in early 2025[1]. Unlike the already implemented ban of TiO<sub>2</sub> in foods, removing this excipient from pharmaceutical products will likely have significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies, and patients. This commentary explores the challenges facing the pharmaceutical industry tasked with supporting the development and registration of TiO<sub>2</sub> free (TF) drug products. Specifically, justification of formulation changes and potential impact to <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> performance, as well as differences in global regulatory comparative dissolution requirements to justify changing to TF drug product are discussed. Particularly, the uncertainties around how a formulation change such as removal of TiO<sub>2</sub> from immediate release solid oral dosage forms will be viewed in Europe compared to other regions is discussed. To respond to these challenges and avoid disruption to the medicines supply chain in case <em>in vitro</em> data such as dissolution is either too challenging or insufficient to justify changing to TF product, pharmaceutical companies may have to decide if the level of risk is worth the effort needed to reformulate, develop, and register a new TF product.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":"113 11","pages":"Pages 3119-3122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industry's perspective on challenges assessing the in vivo impact of removing titanium dioxide (TiO2) from drug products\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Abend ,&nbsp;Diana Sperger ,&nbsp;Dorys Argelia Diaz ,&nbsp;Ruiqiong Guo ,&nbsp;Regina Reul ,&nbsp;Sy-Juen Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xphs.2024.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The European Commission (EC) has tasked the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide a recommendation towards the acceptability of titanium dioxide (TiO<sub>2</sub>) in pharmaceutical products by early 2024 to inform on final decision in early 2025[1]. Unlike the already implemented ban of TiO<sub>2</sub> in foods, removing this excipient from pharmaceutical products will likely have significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies, and patients. This commentary explores the challenges facing the pharmaceutical industry tasked with supporting the development and registration of TiO<sub>2</sub> free (TF) drug products. Specifically, justification of formulation changes and potential impact to <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> performance, as well as differences in global regulatory comparative dissolution requirements to justify changing to TF drug product are discussed. Particularly, the uncertainties around how a formulation change such as removal of TiO<sub>2</sub> from immediate release solid oral dosage forms will be viewed in Europe compared to other regions is discussed. To respond to these challenges and avoid disruption to the medicines supply chain in case <em>in vitro</em> data such as dissolution is either too challenging or insufficient to justify changing to TF product, pharmaceutical companies may have to decide if the level of risk is worth the effort needed to reformulate, develop, and register a new TF product.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences\",\"volume\":\"113 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 3119-3122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022354924003034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022354924003034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟委员会(EC)已责成欧洲药品管理局(EMA)在 2024 年初就药品中二氧化钛(TiO2)的可接受性提出建议,以便在 2025 年初做出最终决定[1]。与已在食品中实施的二氧化钛禁令不同,从药品中去除这种辅料可能会对制药行业、监管机构和患者产生重大影响。本评论探讨了制药行业在支持开发和注册不含二氧化钛(TF)的药品时所面临的挑战。具体而言,讨论了改变配方的理由、对体外和体内性能的潜在影响,以及全球监管机构对溶出度比较要求的差异,以证明改用TF药物产品的合理性。特别是,讨论了欧洲与其他地区相比如何看待制剂变更的不确定性,如在速释口服固体制剂中去除二氧化钛。为了应对这些挑战,避免在溶出度等体外数据太难或不足以证明有理由改用 TF 产品的情况下中断药品供应链,制药公司可能必须决定风险程度是否值得为重新配制、开发和注册新的 TF 产品而付出努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Industry's perspective on challenges assessing the in vivo impact of removing titanium dioxide (TiO2) from drug products
The European Commission (EC) has tasked the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide a recommendation towards the acceptability of titanium dioxide (TiO2) in pharmaceutical products by early 2024 to inform on final decision in early 2025[1]. Unlike the already implemented ban of TiO2 in foods, removing this excipient from pharmaceutical products will likely have significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies, and patients. This commentary explores the challenges facing the pharmaceutical industry tasked with supporting the development and registration of TiO2 free (TF) drug products. Specifically, justification of formulation changes and potential impact to in vitro and in vivo performance, as well as differences in global regulatory comparative dissolution requirements to justify changing to TF drug product are discussed. Particularly, the uncertainties around how a formulation change such as removal of TiO2 from immediate release solid oral dosage forms will be viewed in Europe compared to other regions is discussed. To respond to these challenges and avoid disruption to the medicines supply chain in case in vitro data such as dissolution is either too challenging or insufficient to justify changing to TF product, pharmaceutical companies may have to decide if the level of risk is worth the effort needed to reformulate, develop, and register a new TF product.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
367
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences will publish original research papers, original research notes, invited topical reviews (including Minireviews), and editorial commentary and news. The area of focus shall be concepts in basic pharmaceutical science and such topics as chemical processing of pharmaceuticals, including crystallization, lyophilization, chemical stability of drugs, pharmacokinetics, biopharmaceutics, pharmacodynamics, pro-drug developments, metabolic disposition of bioactive agents, dosage form design, protein-peptide chemistry and biotechnology specifically as these relate to pharmaceutical technology, and targeted drug delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信