改善超音速气动性能的新型机翼

IF 4 3区 工程技术 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Zeyad M. Manaa, Naef A.A. Qasem
{"title":"改善超音速气动性能的新型机翼","authors":"Zeyad M. Manaa, Naef A.A. Qasem","doi":"10.1108/hff-06-2024-0433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to validate the linear flow theory with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and to propose a novel shape for the airfoil that will improve supersonic aerodynamic performance compared to the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) 64a210 airfoil.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>To design the new airfoil shape, this study uses a convex optimization approach to obtain a global optimal shape for an airfoil. First, modeling is conducted using linear flow theory, and then numerical verification is done by CFD simulations using ANSYS Fluent. The optimization process ensures that the new airfoil maintains the same cross-sectional area and thickness as the NACA 64a210 airfoil. This study found that an efficient way to obtain the ideal airfoil shape is by using linear flow theory, and the numerical simulations supported the assumptions inherent in the linear flow theory.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This study’s findings show notable improvements (from 4% to 200%) in the aerodynamic performance of the airfoil, especially in the supersonic range, which points to the suggested airfoil as a potential option for several fighter aircraft. Under various supersonic conditions, the optimized airfoil exhibits improved lift-over-drag ratios, leading to improved flight performance and lower fuel consumption.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This study was conducted mainly for supersonic flow, whereas the subsonic flow is tested for a Mach number of 0.7. This study would be extended for both subsonic and supersonic flights.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Convex optimization and linear flow theory are combined in this work to create an airfoil that performs better in supersonic conditions than the NACA 64a210. By closely matching the CFD results, the linear flow theory's robustness is confirmed. This means that the initial design phase no longer requires extensive CFD simulations, and the linear flow theory can be used quickly and efficiently to obtain optimal airfoil shapes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>The proposed airfoil can be used in different fighter aircraft to enhance performance and reduce fuel consumption. Thus, lower carbon emission is expected.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The unique aspect of this work is how convex optimization and linear flow theory were combined to create an airfoil that performs better in supersonic conditions than the NACA 64a210. Comprehensive CFD simulations were used for validation, highlighting the optimization approach's strength and usefulness in aerospace engineering.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":14263,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel airfoil for improved supersonic aerodynamic performance\",\"authors\":\"Zeyad M. Manaa, Naef A.A. Qasem\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/hff-06-2024-0433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to validate the linear flow theory with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and to propose a novel shape for the airfoil that will improve supersonic aerodynamic performance compared to the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) 64a210 airfoil.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>To design the new airfoil shape, this study uses a convex optimization approach to obtain a global optimal shape for an airfoil. First, modeling is conducted using linear flow theory, and then numerical verification is done by CFD simulations using ANSYS Fluent. The optimization process ensures that the new airfoil maintains the same cross-sectional area and thickness as the NACA 64a210 airfoil. This study found that an efficient way to obtain the ideal airfoil shape is by using linear flow theory, and the numerical simulations supported the assumptions inherent in the linear flow theory.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>This study’s findings show notable improvements (from 4% to 200%) in the aerodynamic performance of the airfoil, especially in the supersonic range, which points to the suggested airfoil as a potential option for several fighter aircraft. Under various supersonic conditions, the optimized airfoil exhibits improved lift-over-drag ratios, leading to improved flight performance and lower fuel consumption.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>This study was conducted mainly for supersonic flow, whereas the subsonic flow is tested for a Mach number of 0.7. This study would be extended for both subsonic and supersonic flights.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Convex optimization and linear flow theory are combined in this work to create an airfoil that performs better in supersonic conditions than the NACA 64a210. By closely matching the CFD results, the linear flow theory's robustness is confirmed. This means that the initial design phase no longer requires extensive CFD simulations, and the linear flow theory can be used quickly and efficiently to obtain optimal airfoil shapes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\\n<p>The proposed airfoil can be used in different fighter aircraft to enhance performance and reduce fuel consumption. Thus, lower carbon emission is expected.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The unique aspect of this work is how convex optimization and linear flow theory were combined to create an airfoil that performs better in supersonic conditions than the NACA 64a210. Comprehensive CFD simulations were used for validation, highlighting the optimization approach's strength and usefulness in aerospace engineering.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":14263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/hff-06-2024-0433\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/hff-06-2024-0433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在通过计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟验证线性流理论,并提出一种新型机翼形状,与美国国家航空咨询委员会(NACA)64a210 机翼相比,该形状将提高超音速气动性能。首先,使用线性流理论进行建模,然后使用 ANSYS Fluent 进行 CFD 仿真,进行数值验证。优化过程确保新机翼保持与 NACA 64a210 机翼相同的横截面积和厚度。这项研究发现,获得理想翼面形状的有效方法是使用线性流理论,而数值模拟支持线性流理论的固有假设。研究结果这项研究结果表明,翼面的气动性能显著提高(从 4% 到 200%),尤其是在超音速范围内,这表明建议的翼面有可能成为几种战斗机的选择。在各种超音速条件下,优化后的翼面显示出更好的升阻比,从而提高了飞行性能,降低了燃料消耗。本研究将扩展到亚音速和超音速飞行。实际意义本研究将凸优化和线性流动理论相结合,创造出一种在超音速条件下比 NACA 64a210 性能更好的机翼。通过密切匹配 CFD 结果,证实了线性流理论的稳健性。这意味着初始设计阶段不再需要大量的 CFD 仿真,而可以快速有效地利用线性流理论获得最佳翼型。原创性/价值这项工作的独特之处在于如何将凸优化和线性流理论相结合,创造出一种在超音速条件下比 NACA 64a210 性能更好的机翼。全面的 CFD 模拟用于验证,凸显了优化方法在航空航天工程中的优势和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel airfoil for improved supersonic aerodynamic performance

Purpose

This study aims to validate the linear flow theory with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and to propose a novel shape for the airfoil that will improve supersonic aerodynamic performance compared to the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) 64a210 airfoil.

Design/methodology/approach

To design the new airfoil shape, this study uses a convex optimization approach to obtain a global optimal shape for an airfoil. First, modeling is conducted using linear flow theory, and then numerical verification is done by CFD simulations using ANSYS Fluent. The optimization process ensures that the new airfoil maintains the same cross-sectional area and thickness as the NACA 64a210 airfoil. This study found that an efficient way to obtain the ideal airfoil shape is by using linear flow theory, and the numerical simulations supported the assumptions inherent in the linear flow theory.

Findings

This study’s findings show notable improvements (from 4% to 200%) in the aerodynamic performance of the airfoil, especially in the supersonic range, which points to the suggested airfoil as a potential option for several fighter aircraft. Under various supersonic conditions, the optimized airfoil exhibits improved lift-over-drag ratios, leading to improved flight performance and lower fuel consumption.

Research limitations/implications

This study was conducted mainly for supersonic flow, whereas the subsonic flow is tested for a Mach number of 0.7. This study would be extended for both subsonic and supersonic flights.

Practical implications

Convex optimization and linear flow theory are combined in this work to create an airfoil that performs better in supersonic conditions than the NACA 64a210. By closely matching the CFD results, the linear flow theory's robustness is confirmed. This means that the initial design phase no longer requires extensive CFD simulations, and the linear flow theory can be used quickly and efficiently to obtain optimal airfoil shapes.

Social implications

The proposed airfoil can be used in different fighter aircraft to enhance performance and reduce fuel consumption. Thus, lower carbon emission is expected.

Originality/value

The unique aspect of this work is how convex optimization and linear flow theory were combined to create an airfoil that performs better in supersonic conditions than the NACA 64a210. Comprehensive CFD simulations were used for validation, highlighting the optimization approach's strength and usefulness in aerospace engineering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
11.90%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of this international journal is to provide applied mathematicians, engineers and scientists engaged in computer-aided design and research in computational heat transfer and fluid dynamics, whether in academic institutions of industry, with timely and accessible information on the development, refinement and application of computer-based numerical techniques for solving problems in heat and fluid flow. - See more at: http://emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=hff#sthash.Kf80GRt8.dpuf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信