不同类型的拔罐疗法对踝关节外翻急性变化的影响

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Alexandria N. Schaub , Julie A. Rochester , Kari L. Getschow , Megan C. Nelson
{"title":"不同类型的拔罐疗法对踝关节外翻急性变化的影响","authors":"Alexandria N. Schaub ,&nbsp;Julie A. Rochester ,&nbsp;Kari L. Getschow ,&nbsp;Megan C. Nelson","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Cupping therapy involves lifting and separating fascial tissue to facilitate stretching and promote blood flow. Although cupping is a common treatment modality for pain, various protocols exist and studies are inconsistent in regards to whether cupping improves outcomes such as range of motion. We aimed to determine the acute effect of different types of cupping therapy on ankle dorsiflexion.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-five generally healthy adults (mean ± SD; age: 22.1 ± 4.52 y; baseline ankle ROM: 34.68 ± 4.22°) were randomly assigned to one of four cupping therapy treatment groups: static, dynamic, static sham, or dynamic sham<strong>.</strong> Ankle ROM was measured using a digital inclinometer pre- and immediately post-intervention. ANCOVA was used to determine whether ROM differed between groups post-treatment when controlling for baseline ROM and the minimal detectable change (MDC) was used to determine clinical meaningfulness of the changes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Baseline ROM was significantly associated with post-intervention ROM (post-ROM: 38.41 ± 4.95°; p &lt; .001), indicating an overall increase in ROM regardless of the intervention received. There was no difference in ROM between therapy groups post-intervention after controlling for baseline ROM. The dynamic cupping group experienced a change in ROM (baseline ROM: 34.11 ± 4.62°, post-ROM: 39.19 ± 6.44°) above the MDC (5.08°).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings support cupping as a modality for improving ankle ROM in individuals with limited ROM. Dynamic cupping may be effective for improving ankle ROM due to the addition of functional movement. Clinicians may consider dynamic cupping as a potential intervention to address limited ankle ROM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of different types of cupping therapy on acute changes in ankle dorsiflexion\",\"authors\":\"Alexandria N. Schaub ,&nbsp;Julie A. Rochester ,&nbsp;Kari L. Getschow ,&nbsp;Megan C. Nelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.08.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Cupping therapy involves lifting and separating fascial tissue to facilitate stretching and promote blood flow. Although cupping is a common treatment modality for pain, various protocols exist and studies are inconsistent in regards to whether cupping improves outcomes such as range of motion. We aimed to determine the acute effect of different types of cupping therapy on ankle dorsiflexion.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-five generally healthy adults (mean ± SD; age: 22.1 ± 4.52 y; baseline ankle ROM: 34.68 ± 4.22°) were randomly assigned to one of four cupping therapy treatment groups: static, dynamic, static sham, or dynamic sham<strong>.</strong> Ankle ROM was measured using a digital inclinometer pre- and immediately post-intervention. ANCOVA was used to determine whether ROM differed between groups post-treatment when controlling for baseline ROM and the minimal detectable change (MDC) was used to determine clinical meaningfulness of the changes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Baseline ROM was significantly associated with post-intervention ROM (post-ROM: 38.41 ± 4.95°; p &lt; .001), indicating an overall increase in ROM regardless of the intervention received. There was no difference in ROM between therapy groups post-intervention after controlling for baseline ROM. The dynamic cupping group experienced a change in ROM (baseline ROM: 34.11 ± 4.62°, post-ROM: 39.19 ± 6.44°) above the MDC (5.08°).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings support cupping as a modality for improving ankle ROM in individuals with limited ROM. Dynamic cupping may be effective for improving ankle ROM due to the addition of functional movement. Clinicians may consider dynamic cupping as a potential intervention to address limited ankle ROM.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言拔罐疗法包括提拉和分离筋膜组织,以促进拉伸和血液流动。尽管拔罐是一种常见的疼痛治疗方法,但目前存在各种不同的治疗方案,而且关于拔罐是否能改善运动范围等结果的研究也不一致。我们的目的是确定不同类型的拔罐疗法对踝关节背屈的急性影响。方法35 名身体健康的成年人(平均±标清;年龄:22.1±4.52 岁;基线踝关节活动度:34.68±4.22°)被随机分配到四个拔罐疗法治疗组中的一个:静态、动态、静态假或动态假。在干预前和干预后立即使用数字倾角仪测量踝关节ROM。采用方差分析来确定在控制基线ROM的情况下,治疗后各组之间的ROM是否存在差异,并采用最小可检测变化(MDC)来确定变化的临床意义。结果 基线ROM与干预后的ROM显著相关(干预后ROM:38.41 ± 4.95°;p <.001),表明无论接受何种干预,ROM都有全面提高。在控制了基线 ROM 后,干预后各治疗组之间的 ROM 没有差异。动态拔罐组的 ROM 变化(基线 ROM:34.11 ± 4.62°,拔罐后:39.19 ± 6.44°)高于 MDC(5.08°)。由于增加了功能性运动,动态拔罐可有效改善踝关节的活动度。临床医生可以考虑将动态拔罐作为解决踝关节活动度受限的潜在干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of different types of cupping therapy on acute changes in ankle dorsiflexion

Introduction

Cupping therapy involves lifting and separating fascial tissue to facilitate stretching and promote blood flow. Although cupping is a common treatment modality for pain, various protocols exist and studies are inconsistent in regards to whether cupping improves outcomes such as range of motion. We aimed to determine the acute effect of different types of cupping therapy on ankle dorsiflexion.

Methods

Thirty-five generally healthy adults (mean ± SD; age: 22.1 ± 4.52 y; baseline ankle ROM: 34.68 ± 4.22°) were randomly assigned to one of four cupping therapy treatment groups: static, dynamic, static sham, or dynamic sham. Ankle ROM was measured using a digital inclinometer pre- and immediately post-intervention. ANCOVA was used to determine whether ROM differed between groups post-treatment when controlling for baseline ROM and the minimal detectable change (MDC) was used to determine clinical meaningfulness of the changes.

Results

Baseline ROM was significantly associated with post-intervention ROM (post-ROM: 38.41 ± 4.95°; p < .001), indicating an overall increase in ROM regardless of the intervention received. There was no difference in ROM between therapy groups post-intervention after controlling for baseline ROM. The dynamic cupping group experienced a change in ROM (baseline ROM: 34.11 ± 4.62°, post-ROM: 39.19 ± 6.44°) above the MDC (5.08°).

Conclusion

Our findings support cupping as a modality for improving ankle ROM in individuals with limited ROM. Dynamic cupping may be effective for improving ankle ROM due to the addition of functional movement. Clinicians may consider dynamic cupping as a potential intervention to address limited ankle ROM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信