Matthys Strydom , Ruan Veldtman , Mzabalazo Z. Ngwenya , Karen J. Esler
{"title":"质疑种子减少剂对入侵金合欢的有效性:荚果产量与经典生物防治制剂虫瘿数量的关系","authors":"Matthys Strydom , Ruan Veldtman , Mzabalazo Z. Ngwenya , Karen J. Esler","doi":"10.1016/j.ppees.2024.125813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It has been widely accepted that the biological control agents released on invasive Australian <em>Acacia</em> in South Africa, have impacted on the population dynamics of their host plants. However, there are no quantitative data to support these claims and these invasive species remain at similar abundance levels prior to the release of their associated biological control agents and also show evidence of range expansion. The effect of biological control agents, two bud galling wasps (<em>Trichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae</em> and <em>T. signiventris</em>) and one gall-forming rust fungus (<em>Uromycladium morrisii</em>), on the pod production of their respective hosts (<em>Acacia longifolia</em>, <em>A. pycnantha</em> and <em>A. saligna</em>) was assessed by quantifying the reproductive and galled trees per hectare as well as the pods and galls produced per tree and per square meter over a one to two year period. It was shown that invasive Australian <em>Acacia</em> satiate their gall-forming biological control agents, with many pods surviving in their presence. Pod production and loss was placed into perspective using recent findings of seed rain and seed bank studies. It was concluded, based on pod production, seed rain and seed bank data that despite <em>T. acaciaelongifoliae</em>, <em>T. signiventris</em> and <em>U. morrisii</em> reducing pod production, they have had no impact on the population dynamics of their invasive Australian <em>Acacia</em> hosts in South Africa.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1433831924000362/pdfft?md5=cab52985d8bb63c830edcb3be52eb1d2&pid=1-s2.0-S1433831924000362-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questioning the effectiveness of seed-reducing agents on invasive Acacia: Pod production relative to gall abundance of classical biological control agents\",\"authors\":\"Matthys Strydom , Ruan Veldtman , Mzabalazo Z. Ngwenya , Karen J. Esler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ppees.2024.125813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>It has been widely accepted that the biological control agents released on invasive Australian <em>Acacia</em> in South Africa, have impacted on the population dynamics of their host plants. However, there are no quantitative data to support these claims and these invasive species remain at similar abundance levels prior to the release of their associated biological control agents and also show evidence of range expansion. The effect of biological control agents, two bud galling wasps (<em>Trichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae</em> and <em>T. signiventris</em>) and one gall-forming rust fungus (<em>Uromycladium morrisii</em>), on the pod production of their respective hosts (<em>Acacia longifolia</em>, <em>A. pycnantha</em> and <em>A. saligna</em>) was assessed by quantifying the reproductive and galled trees per hectare as well as the pods and galls produced per tree and per square meter over a one to two year period. It was shown that invasive Australian <em>Acacia</em> satiate their gall-forming biological control agents, with many pods surviving in their presence. Pod production and loss was placed into perspective using recent findings of seed rain and seed bank studies. It was concluded, based on pod production, seed rain and seed bank data that despite <em>T. acaciaelongifoliae</em>, <em>T. signiventris</em> and <em>U. morrisii</em> reducing pod production, they have had no impact on the population dynamics of their invasive Australian <em>Acacia</em> hosts in South Africa.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1433831924000362/pdfft?md5=cab52985d8bb63c830edcb3be52eb1d2&pid=1-s2.0-S1433831924000362-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1433831924000362\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1433831924000362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人们普遍认为,在南非对入侵的澳大利亚相思树释放的生物控制剂对其寄主植物的种群动态产生了影响。然而,没有定量数据支持这些说法,这些入侵物种的数量与释放相关生物控制剂之前的数量相差无几,而且还有证据表明其分布范围在扩大。通过量化一到两年内每公顷繁殖树和被瘿树的数量以及每棵树和每平方米产生的豆荚和虫瘿数量,评估了生物控制剂(两种芽瘿小蜂(Trichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae 和 T. signiventris)和一种虫瘿形成锈菌(Uromycladium morrisii))对其各自宿主(Acacia longifolia、A. pycnantha 和 A. saligna)豆荚产量的影响。结果表明,入侵的澳大利亚相思树能满足其虫瘿形成生物控制剂的需求,在它们的存在下,许多豆荚得以存活。利用最近的种子雨和种子库研究结果,对豆荚的产量和损失进行了分析。根据豆荚产量、种子雨和种子库数据得出的结论是,尽管 T. acaciaelongifoliae、T. signiventris 和 U. morrisii 减少了豆荚产量,但它们对其入侵南非的澳大利亚金合欢寄主的种群动态没有影响。
Questioning the effectiveness of seed-reducing agents on invasive Acacia: Pod production relative to gall abundance of classical biological control agents
It has been widely accepted that the biological control agents released on invasive Australian Acacia in South Africa, have impacted on the population dynamics of their host plants. However, there are no quantitative data to support these claims and these invasive species remain at similar abundance levels prior to the release of their associated biological control agents and also show evidence of range expansion. The effect of biological control agents, two bud galling wasps (Trichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae and T. signiventris) and one gall-forming rust fungus (Uromycladium morrisii), on the pod production of their respective hosts (Acacia longifolia, A. pycnantha and A. saligna) was assessed by quantifying the reproductive and galled trees per hectare as well as the pods and galls produced per tree and per square meter over a one to two year period. It was shown that invasive Australian Acacia satiate their gall-forming biological control agents, with many pods surviving in their presence. Pod production and loss was placed into perspective using recent findings of seed rain and seed bank studies. It was concluded, based on pod production, seed rain and seed bank data that despite T. acaciaelongifoliae, T. signiventris and U. morrisii reducing pod production, they have had no impact on the population dynamics of their invasive Australian Acacia hosts in South Africa.