相邻声学多普勒流速剖面仪产生的部分损坏流量测量数据在能量产出评估中的用途

Q4 Engineering
Luke Evans , Ian Ashton , Brian Sellar
{"title":"相邻声学多普勒流速剖面仪产生的部分损坏流量测量数据在能量产出评估中的用途","authors":"Luke Evans ,&nbsp;Ian Ashton ,&nbsp;Brian Sellar","doi":"10.1016/j.measen.2024.101293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recommended practice for quantifying the energy resource at a tidal energy site requires the use of multiple instruments deployed across the site. However, the instruments used work by emitting an acoustic pulse and instruments working at the same time have the potential to interfere with each other through a process known as ’cross-talk’. It is important to understand the impact of cross-talk on measurements and how this can be managed and through data processing or suitable positioning of devices. The ReDAPT project conducted a measurement campaign using two Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) placed upstream of an operational tidal turbine. This aimed to assess the ’in-line’ instrument placement guidelines from IEC 62600-200 for Power Performance Assessment (PPA) in real-world conditions. Consequently, the results within hold potential to support arguments for expanding these zones or adjusting their general dimensions. Despite adhering to industry standards and best practices to eliminate unreliable data in the Quality Control (QC) checks, in both concurrently measuring ADCPs at different time stamps in approximately 15 % of the returned data. This work identified for the first time interference throughout the campaign and quantified subsequent impact on estimates. A method to remove data anomalies caused by interference between closely positioned ADCPs has been developed and demonstrated, resulting in a 7 % variation in estimated Annual Energy Production (AEP). The algorithm effectively removed approximately 90 % of the corrupted measurements. Moving forward, multi-sensor deployments could use the algorithm described to double-check for interference within the data sets, although care should be taken to avoid this by choosing a suitable layout for deployment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34311,"journal":{"name":"Measurement Sensors","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 101293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917424002691/pdfft?md5=30e40f2957963f548db06be49a880498&pid=1-s2.0-S2665917424002691-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the utility of partially corrupted flow measurement data arising from adjacent acoustic Doppler current profilers for energy yield assessment\",\"authors\":\"Luke Evans ,&nbsp;Ian Ashton ,&nbsp;Brian Sellar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.measen.2024.101293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recommended practice for quantifying the energy resource at a tidal energy site requires the use of multiple instruments deployed across the site. However, the instruments used work by emitting an acoustic pulse and instruments working at the same time have the potential to interfere with each other through a process known as ’cross-talk’. It is important to understand the impact of cross-talk on measurements and how this can be managed and through data processing or suitable positioning of devices. The ReDAPT project conducted a measurement campaign using two Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) placed upstream of an operational tidal turbine. This aimed to assess the ’in-line’ instrument placement guidelines from IEC 62600-200 for Power Performance Assessment (PPA) in real-world conditions. Consequently, the results within hold potential to support arguments for expanding these zones or adjusting their general dimensions. Despite adhering to industry standards and best practices to eliminate unreliable data in the Quality Control (QC) checks, in both concurrently measuring ADCPs at different time stamps in approximately 15 % of the returned data. This work identified for the first time interference throughout the campaign and quantified subsequent impact on estimates. A method to remove data anomalies caused by interference between closely positioned ADCPs has been developed and demonstrated, resulting in a 7 % variation in estimated Annual Energy Production (AEP). The algorithm effectively removed approximately 90 % of the corrupted measurements. Moving forward, multi-sensor deployments could use the algorithm described to double-check for interference within the data sets, although care should be taken to avoid this by choosing a suitable layout for deployment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement Sensors\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917424002691/pdfft?md5=30e40f2957963f548db06be49a880498&pid=1-s2.0-S2665917424002691-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement Sensors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917424002691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917424002691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对潮汐能站点的能源资源进行量化的推荐做法要求在整个站点使用多种仪器。然而,所使用的仪器是通过发射声脉冲来工作的,同时工作的仪器有可能通过 "串扰 "过程相互干扰。了解串扰对测量的影响以及如何通过数据处理或设备的适当定位来控制这种影响非常重要。ReDAPT 项目使用两台声学多普勒海流剖面仪 (ADCP) 进行了一次测量活动,这两台设备被放置在一台运行中的潮汐涡轮机上游。该项目旨在评估 IEC 62600-200 标准中的 "在线 "仪器放置指南,以便在实际条件下进行功率性能评估 (PPA)。因此,研究结果有可能支持扩大这些区域或调整其总体尺寸的论点。尽管在质量控制 (QC) 检查中遵守了消除不可靠数据的行业标准和最佳实践,但在同时测量的 ADCPs 中,约有 15% 的返回数据存在不同的时间戳。这项工作首次确定了整个活动中的干扰,并量化了随后对估算的影响。开发并演示了一种方法,用于消除因位置较近的 ADCPs 之间的干扰而造成的数据异常,从而使估算的年发电量 (AEP) 相差 7%。该算法有效消除了约 90% 的干扰测量值。展望未来,多传感器部署可使用所述算法来重复检查数据集内的干扰,但应注意选择合适的部署布局以避免干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the utility of partially corrupted flow measurement data arising from adjacent acoustic Doppler current profilers for energy yield assessment

Recommended practice for quantifying the energy resource at a tidal energy site requires the use of multiple instruments deployed across the site. However, the instruments used work by emitting an acoustic pulse and instruments working at the same time have the potential to interfere with each other through a process known as ’cross-talk’. It is important to understand the impact of cross-talk on measurements and how this can be managed and through data processing or suitable positioning of devices. The ReDAPT project conducted a measurement campaign using two Acoustic Doppler Current Profilers (ADCPs) placed upstream of an operational tidal turbine. This aimed to assess the ’in-line’ instrument placement guidelines from IEC 62600-200 for Power Performance Assessment (PPA) in real-world conditions. Consequently, the results within hold potential to support arguments for expanding these zones or adjusting their general dimensions. Despite adhering to industry standards and best practices to eliminate unreliable data in the Quality Control (QC) checks, in both concurrently measuring ADCPs at different time stamps in approximately 15 % of the returned data. This work identified for the first time interference throughout the campaign and quantified subsequent impact on estimates. A method to remove data anomalies caused by interference between closely positioned ADCPs has been developed and demonstrated, resulting in a 7 % variation in estimated Annual Energy Production (AEP). The algorithm effectively removed approximately 90 % of the corrupted measurements. Moving forward, multi-sensor deployments could use the algorithm described to double-check for interference within the data sets, although care should be taken to avoid this by choosing a suitable layout for deployment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Measurement Sensors
Measurement Sensors Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
184
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信