达特茅斯研究所的临终队列:医疗市场的风险调整、慢性病利用的相对效率以及临终病人的经历。

Kristen K Bronner, David C Goodman
{"title":"达特茅斯研究所的临终队列:医疗市场的风险调整、慢性病利用的相对效率以及临终病人的经历。","authors":"Kristen K Bronner, David C Goodman","doi":"10.1007/s43999-024-00039-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since their inception, small area studies intended to measure health system performance have been challenged by concerns that regional variation in health care may be primarily explained by differences in patient health risk. Controlling for regional population differences depends on appropriate risk adjustment, but the adequacy of the methods used in early analyses was contested. A novel response to these concerns was the development of end-of-life cohorts by Dartmouth Atlas investigators. These were used initially to control for differences in population health status in studies investigating relative efficiency across regions. Later, they became useful for studying hospital-level variation in chronic illness care, and for measuring utilization and patient experiences at the very end of life. Altogether, end-of-life cohorts have been invaluable for clarifying the contribution of health system and provider factors to health care variation and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520076,"journal":{"name":"Research in health services & regions","volume":"3 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11281768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"End-of-life cohorts from the Dartmouth Institute: risk adjustment across health care markets, the relative efficiency of chronic illness utilization, and patient experiences near the end of life.\",\"authors\":\"Kristen K Bronner, David C Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43999-024-00039-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since their inception, small area studies intended to measure health system performance have been challenged by concerns that regional variation in health care may be primarily explained by differences in patient health risk. Controlling for regional population differences depends on appropriate risk adjustment, but the adequacy of the methods used in early analyses was contested. A novel response to these concerns was the development of end-of-life cohorts by Dartmouth Atlas investigators. These were used initially to control for differences in population health status in studies investigating relative efficiency across regions. Later, they became useful for studying hospital-level variation in chronic illness care, and for measuring utilization and patient experiences at the very end of life. Altogether, end-of-life cohorts have been invaluable for clarifying the contribution of health system and provider factors to health care variation and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in health services & regions\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11281768/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in health services & regions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43999-024-00039-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in health services & regions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43999-024-00039-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

旨在衡量医疗系统绩效的小地区研究自开展以来就一直受到质疑,因为人们担心医疗服务的地区差异可能主要是由患者的健康风险差异造成的。地区人口差异的控制取决于适当的风险调整,但早期分析中使用的方法是否适当却存在争议。针对这些问题,达特茅斯地图集研究人员提出了一个新的对策,即建立生命末期队列。这些队列最初用于在调查不同地区相对效率的研究中控制人口健康状况的差异。后来,它们在研究医院层面的慢性病护理差异以及衡量生命末期的利用率和患者体验方面变得非常有用。总之,生命末期队列对于阐明医疗系统和医疗服务提供者因素对医疗服务差异和结果的影响非常有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
End-of-life cohorts from the Dartmouth Institute: risk adjustment across health care markets, the relative efficiency of chronic illness utilization, and patient experiences near the end of life.

Since their inception, small area studies intended to measure health system performance have been challenged by concerns that regional variation in health care may be primarily explained by differences in patient health risk. Controlling for regional population differences depends on appropriate risk adjustment, but the adequacy of the methods used in early analyses was contested. A novel response to these concerns was the development of end-of-life cohorts by Dartmouth Atlas investigators. These were used initially to control for differences in population health status in studies investigating relative efficiency across regions. Later, they became useful for studying hospital-level variation in chronic illness care, and for measuring utilization and patient experiences at the very end of life. Altogether, end-of-life cohorts have been invaluable for clarifying the contribution of health system and provider factors to health care variation and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信