护理院注册类型和规模对高级护理领导者提供姑息治疗和临终关怀信心的影响:一项解释性顺序混合方法研究。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
India Tunnard, Katherine E Sleeman, Andy Bradshaw, Anna E Bone, Catherine J Evans
{"title":"护理院注册类型和规模对高级护理领导者提供姑息治疗和临终关怀信心的影响:一项解释性顺序混合方法研究。","authors":"India Tunnard, Katherine E Sleeman, Andy Bradshaw, Anna E Bone, Catherine J Evans","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01525-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care home staff are key providers of palliative and end-of-life care. Yet, little is known about how care home characteristics can influence care leader's confidence in their ability to provide optimal palliative and end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand the influence of care home registration type (nursing, residential or dual registered) and size on senior care leader's confidence to provide palliative and end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed methods study comprising an online cross-sectional survey (including the Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale) and qualitative individual interviews. Analysis of survey data used a multivariate logistic regression and qualitative interview data used Framework Analysis. A 'Following the Thread' method was undertaken for data integration.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>UK care home senior care leaders, purposively sampled by registration type, size and geographical location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The online survey (N = 107) results indicated that nursing home senior care leaders had higher confidence scores on the Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale than residential care home leaders (aOR: 3.85, 95% CI 1.20-12.31, p = 0.02). Care home size did not show effect when adjusting for registration type (medium - aOR 1.71, 95% CI 0.59-4.97, p = 0.33; large - aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.18-2.30, p = 0.5). Interviews (n = 27) identified three themes that promote confidence, (1) 'feelings of preparedness' stemming from staff expertise and experience and care home infrastructure, (2) 'partnership working' with external services as a valued member of the multidisciplinary team, and (3) a shared language developed from end-of-life care guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Care home senior care leader's confidence is influenced by care home characteristics, particularly availability of on-site registered nurses and the infrastructure of large care homes. All care home leaders benefit from training, working with external, multidisciplinary teams and use of guidance. However, mechanisms to achieve this differed by care home type and size. Further exploration is needed on successful integration of palliative care services and interventions to enhance confidence in residential care homes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"23 1","pages":"213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of care home registration type and size on senior care leader's confidence to provide palliative and end-of-life care: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study.\",\"authors\":\"India Tunnard, Katherine E Sleeman, Andy Bradshaw, Anna E Bone, Catherine J Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12904-024-01525-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Care home staff are key providers of palliative and end-of-life care. Yet, little is known about how care home characteristics can influence care leader's confidence in their ability to provide optimal palliative and end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand the influence of care home registration type (nursing, residential or dual registered) and size on senior care leader's confidence to provide palliative and end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed methods study comprising an online cross-sectional survey (including the Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale) and qualitative individual interviews. Analysis of survey data used a multivariate logistic regression and qualitative interview data used Framework Analysis. A 'Following the Thread' method was undertaken for data integration.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>UK care home senior care leaders, purposively sampled by registration type, size and geographical location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The online survey (N = 107) results indicated that nursing home senior care leaders had higher confidence scores on the Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale than residential care home leaders (aOR: 3.85, 95% CI 1.20-12.31, p = 0.02). Care home size did not show effect when adjusting for registration type (medium - aOR 1.71, 95% CI 0.59-4.97, p = 0.33; large - aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.18-2.30, p = 0.5). Interviews (n = 27) identified three themes that promote confidence, (1) 'feelings of preparedness' stemming from staff expertise and experience and care home infrastructure, (2) 'partnership working' with external services as a valued member of the multidisciplinary team, and (3) a shared language developed from end-of-life care guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Care home senior care leader's confidence is influenced by care home characteristics, particularly availability of on-site registered nurses and the infrastructure of large care homes. All care home leaders benefit from training, working with external, multidisciplinary teams and use of guidance. However, mechanisms to achieve this differed by care home type and size. Further exploration is needed on successful integration of palliative care services and interventions to enhance confidence in residential care homes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01525-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01525-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景介绍护理院工作人员是姑息关怀和临终关怀的主要提供者。目的:了解护理院注册类型(护理、寄宿或双重注册)和规模对资深护理领导提供姑息关怀和临终关怀的信心的影响:设计:一项解释性顺序混合方法研究,包括在线横断面调查(包括姑息关怀自我效能量表)和定性个人访谈。调查数据分析采用多元逻辑回归法,定性访谈数据分析采用框架分析法。采用 "循线 "法进行数据整合:根据注册类型、规模和地理位置进行有目的的抽样调查:在线调查(N = 107)结果表明,疗养院高级护理领导在姑息关怀自我效能量表上的信心得分高于安老院领导(aOR:3.85,95% CI 1.20-12.31,p = 0.02)。在对注册类型进行调整后,护理院规模并未显示出影响(中型 - aOR 1.71,95% CI 0.59-4.97,p = 0.33;大型 - aOR 0.65,95% CI 0.18-2.30,p = 0.5)。访谈(n = 27)确定了促进信心的三个主题:(1)源于员工专业知识和经验以及护理院基础设施的 "准备感";(2)作为多学科团队的重要成员与外部服务机构的 "合作关系";以及(3)从临终关怀指南中发展出的共同语言:护理院高级护理领导的信心受护理院特征的影响,尤其是现场注册护士的可用性和大型护理院的基础设施。所有护理院领导都能从培训、与外部多学科团队合作以及使用指南中获益。然而,实现这一目标的机制因护理院的类型和规模而异。需要进一步探讨如何成功整合姑息关怀服务和干预措施,以增强安养院的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of care home registration type and size on senior care leader's confidence to provide palliative and end-of-life care: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study.

Background: Care home staff are key providers of palliative and end-of-life care. Yet, little is known about how care home characteristics can influence care leader's confidence in their ability to provide optimal palliative and end-of-life care.

Aim: To understand the influence of care home registration type (nursing, residential or dual registered) and size on senior care leader's confidence to provide palliative and end-of-life care.

Design: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study comprising an online cross-sectional survey (including the Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale) and qualitative individual interviews. Analysis of survey data used a multivariate logistic regression and qualitative interview data used Framework Analysis. A 'Following the Thread' method was undertaken for data integration.

Setting/participants: UK care home senior care leaders, purposively sampled by registration type, size and geographical location.

Results: The online survey (N = 107) results indicated that nursing home senior care leaders had higher confidence scores on the Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale than residential care home leaders (aOR: 3.85, 95% CI 1.20-12.31, p = 0.02). Care home size did not show effect when adjusting for registration type (medium - aOR 1.71, 95% CI 0.59-4.97, p = 0.33; large - aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.18-2.30, p = 0.5). Interviews (n = 27) identified three themes that promote confidence, (1) 'feelings of preparedness' stemming from staff expertise and experience and care home infrastructure, (2) 'partnership working' with external services as a valued member of the multidisciplinary team, and (3) a shared language developed from end-of-life care guidance.

Conclusion: Care home senior care leader's confidence is influenced by care home characteristics, particularly availability of on-site registered nurses and the infrastructure of large care homes. All care home leaders benefit from training, working with external, multidisciplinary teams and use of guidance. However, mechanisms to achieve this differed by care home type and size. Further exploration is needed on successful integration of palliative care services and interventions to enhance confidence in residential care homes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信