美国引入 CDK4/6 抑制剂前后 HR+ 转移性乳腺癌患者的生存趋势:对 HER2- 和 HER2+ 转移性乳腺癌患者的 SEER 登记分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07469-6
Adam Brufsky, Marilyn L Kwan, Rickard Sandin, Stella Stergiopoulos, Siddharth Karanth, Ashley S Cha-Silva, Doris Makari, Ravi K Goyal
{"title":"美国引入 CDK4/6 抑制剂前后 HR+ 转移性乳腺癌患者的生存趋势:对 HER2- 和 HER2+ 转移性乳腺癌患者的 SEER 登记分析。","authors":"Adam Brufsky, Marilyn L Kwan, Rickard Sandin, Stella Stergiopoulos, Siddharth Karanth, Ashley S Cha-Silva, Doris Makari, Ravi K Goyal","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07469-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have improved patient survival in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in clinical trials and real-world studies. However, investigations of survival gains in broader HR+/HER2- mBC populations using epidemiological approaches are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used SEER registry data to assess breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- de novo mBC from 2010 to 2019. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare BCSS in patients diagnosed before (2010‒2013 with follow-up to 2014) and after (2015‒2018 with follow-up to 2019) the 2015 guideline recommendations for CDK4/6i use. A comparison was made to patients with HR+/HER2-positive (HER2+) de novo mBC, for which no major guideline changes occurred during 2015-2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 11,467 women with HR+/HER2- mBC and 3260 women with HR+/HER2+ mBC were included. After baseline characteristic adjustment, patients with HR+/HER2- mBC diagnosed post-2015 (n = 6163), had an approximately 10% reduction in risk of BC-specific death compared with patients diagnosed pre-2015 (n = 5304; HR = 0.895, p < 0.0001). Conversely, no significant change was observed in HR+/HER2+ BCSS post-2015 (n = 1798) versus pre-2015 (n = 1462). Similar results were found in patients aged ≥ 65 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using one of the largest US population-based longitudinal cancer databases, significant improvements in BCSS were noted in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC post-2015 versus pre-2015, potentially due to the introduction of CDK4/6i post-2015. No significant improvement in BCSS was observed in patients with HR+/HER2+ mBC post-2015 versus pre-2015, likely due to the availability of HER2-directed therapies in both time periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"223-235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11455714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in HR+ metastatic breast cancer survival before and after CDK4/6 inhibitor introduction in the United States: a SEER registry analysis of patients with HER2- and HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Brufsky, Marilyn L Kwan, Rickard Sandin, Stella Stergiopoulos, Siddharth Karanth, Ashley S Cha-Silva, Doris Makari, Ravi K Goyal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-024-07469-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have improved patient survival in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in clinical trials and real-world studies. However, investigations of survival gains in broader HR+/HER2- mBC populations using epidemiological approaches are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used SEER registry data to assess breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- de novo mBC from 2010 to 2019. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare BCSS in patients diagnosed before (2010‒2013 with follow-up to 2014) and after (2015‒2018 with follow-up to 2019) the 2015 guideline recommendations for CDK4/6i use. A comparison was made to patients with HR+/HER2-positive (HER2+) de novo mBC, for which no major guideline changes occurred during 2015-2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 11,467 women with HR+/HER2- mBC and 3260 women with HR+/HER2+ mBC were included. After baseline characteristic adjustment, patients with HR+/HER2- mBC diagnosed post-2015 (n = 6163), had an approximately 10% reduction in risk of BC-specific death compared with patients diagnosed pre-2015 (n = 5304; HR = 0.895, p < 0.0001). Conversely, no significant change was observed in HR+/HER2+ BCSS post-2015 (n = 1798) versus pre-2015 (n = 1462). Similar results were found in patients aged ≥ 65 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using one of the largest US population-based longitudinal cancer databases, significant improvements in BCSS were noted in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC post-2015 versus pre-2015, potentially due to the introduction of CDK4/6i post-2015. No significant improvement in BCSS was observed in patients with HR+/HER2+ mBC post-2015 versus pre-2015, likely due to the availability of HER2-directed therapies in both time periods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"223-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11455714/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07469-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07469-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在临床试验和实际研究中,细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)改善了激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+/HER2-)转移性乳腺癌(mBC)患者的生存率。然而,利用流行病学方法对更广泛的HR+/HER2- mBC人群的生存率提高情况进行的调查还很有限:这项回顾性研究利用SEER登记数据评估了2010年至2019年确诊为HR+/HER2-新发mBC患者的乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)。研究使用卡普兰-梅耶尔模型和考克斯比例危险模型比较了2015年指南建议使用CDK4/6i之前(2010-2013年,随访至2014年)和之后(2015-2018年,随访至2019年)确诊患者的BCSS。与HR+/HER2阳性(HER2+)新发型mBC患者进行了比较,2015-2018年期间该指南未发生重大变化:纳入了11467名HR+/HER2- mBC女性患者和3260名HR+/HER2+ mBC女性患者的数据。经过基线特征调整后,2015年后确诊的HR+/HER2- mBC患者(n = 6163)与2015年之前确诊的患者(n = 5304; HR = 0.895, p 结论:与2015年之前确诊的患者相比,HR+/HER2- mBC患者的BC特异性死亡风险降低了约10%:利用美国最大的人口纵向癌症数据库之一,发现2015年后与2015年之前相比,HR+/HER2- mBC患者的BCSS显著改善,这可能是由于2015年后引入了CDK4/6i。2015年后与2015年之前相比,HR+/HER2+ mBC患者的BCSS没有明显改善,这可能是由于这两个时期都有HER2导向疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Trends in HR+ metastatic breast cancer survival before and after CDK4/6 inhibitor introduction in the United States: a SEER registry analysis of patients with HER2- and HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.

Trends in HR+ metastatic breast cancer survival before and after CDK4/6 inhibitor introduction in the United States: a SEER registry analysis of patients with HER2- and HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.

Purpose: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have improved patient survival in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in clinical trials and real-world studies. However, investigations of survival gains in broader HR+/HER2- mBC populations using epidemiological approaches are limited.

Methods: This retrospective study used SEER registry data to assess breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- de novo mBC from 2010 to 2019. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare BCSS in patients diagnosed before (2010‒2013 with follow-up to 2014) and after (2015‒2018 with follow-up to 2019) the 2015 guideline recommendations for CDK4/6i use. A comparison was made to patients with HR+/HER2-positive (HER2+) de novo mBC, for which no major guideline changes occurred during 2015-2018.

Results: Data from 11,467 women with HR+/HER2- mBC and 3260 women with HR+/HER2+ mBC were included. After baseline characteristic adjustment, patients with HR+/HER2- mBC diagnosed post-2015 (n = 6163), had an approximately 10% reduction in risk of BC-specific death compared with patients diagnosed pre-2015 (n = 5304; HR = 0.895, p < 0.0001). Conversely, no significant change was observed in HR+/HER2+ BCSS post-2015 (n = 1798) versus pre-2015 (n = 1462). Similar results were found in patients aged ≥ 65 years.

Conclusion: Using one of the largest US population-based longitudinal cancer databases, significant improvements in BCSS were noted in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC post-2015 versus pre-2015, potentially due to the introduction of CDK4/6i post-2015. No significant improvement in BCSS was observed in patients with HR+/HER2+ mBC post-2015 versus pre-2015, likely due to the availability of HER2-directed therapies in both time periods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信