平衡个人和集体战略:元启发式优化的新方法

IF 4.4 2区 数学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Erik Cuevas , Mario Vásquez , Karla Avila , Alma Rodriguez , Daniel Zaldivar
{"title":"平衡个人和集体战略:元启发式优化的新方法","authors":"Erik Cuevas ,&nbsp;Mario Vásquez ,&nbsp;Karla Avila ,&nbsp;Alma Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Daniel Zaldivar","doi":"10.1016/j.matcom.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Metaheuristic approaches commonly disregard the individual strategies of each agent within a population, focusing primarily on the collective best solution discovered so far. While this methodology can yield promising results, it also has several significant drawbacks, such as premature convergence. This study introduces a new metaheuristic approach that emphasizes the balance between individual and social learning in agents. In this approach, each agent employs two strategies: an individual search technique performed by the agent and a social or collective strategy involving the best-known solution. The search strategy is considered a learning problem, and agents must adjust the use of both individual and social strategies accordingly. The equilibrium of this adjustment is determined by a counter randomly set for each agent, which determines the frequency of use invested in each strategy. This mechanism promotes diverse search patterns and fosters a dynamic and adaptive process, potentially improving problem-solving efficiency in intricate spaces. The proposed method was assessed by comparing it with several well-established metaheuristic algorithms using 21 test functions. The results demonstrate that the new method surpasses popular metaheuristic algorithms by offering superior solutions and attaining quicker convergence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49856,"journal":{"name":"Mathematics and Computers in Simulation","volume":"227 ","pages":"Pages 322-346"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing individual and collective strategies: A new approach in metaheuristic optimization\",\"authors\":\"Erik Cuevas ,&nbsp;Mario Vásquez ,&nbsp;Karla Avila ,&nbsp;Alma Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Daniel Zaldivar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.matcom.2024.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Metaheuristic approaches commonly disregard the individual strategies of each agent within a population, focusing primarily on the collective best solution discovered so far. While this methodology can yield promising results, it also has several significant drawbacks, such as premature convergence. This study introduces a new metaheuristic approach that emphasizes the balance between individual and social learning in agents. In this approach, each agent employs two strategies: an individual search technique performed by the agent and a social or collective strategy involving the best-known solution. The search strategy is considered a learning problem, and agents must adjust the use of both individual and social strategies accordingly. The equilibrium of this adjustment is determined by a counter randomly set for each agent, which determines the frequency of use invested in each strategy. This mechanism promotes diverse search patterns and fosters a dynamic and adaptive process, potentially improving problem-solving efficiency in intricate spaces. The proposed method was assessed by comparing it with several well-established metaheuristic algorithms using 21 test functions. The results demonstrate that the new method surpasses popular metaheuristic algorithms by offering superior solutions and attaining quicker convergence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematics and Computers in Simulation\",\"volume\":\"227 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 322-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematics and Computers in Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475424003069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematics and Computers in Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475424003069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

元启发式方法通常不考虑群体中每个代理的个体策略,而主要关注迄今为止发现的集体最佳解决方案。虽然这种方法能产生很好的结果,但也有一些明显的缺点,比如过早收敛。本研究引入了一种新的元启发式方法,强调代理个体学习和社会学习之间的平衡。在这种方法中,每个代理采用两种策略:一种是由代理执行的个体搜索技术,另一种是涉及最佳已知解决方案的社会或集体策略。搜索策略被视为一个学习问题,代理必须相应地调整个人策略和社会策略的使用。这种调整的平衡点由每个代理随机设置的计数器决定,计数器决定每个策略的使用频率。这种机制促进了多样化的搜索模式,促进了动态的适应过程,有可能提高在错综复杂的空间中解决问题的效率。通过使用 21 个测试函数,与几种成熟的元启发式算法进行比较,对所提出的方法进行了评估。结果表明,新方法超越了流行的元启发式算法,提供了更优越的解决方案,并实现了更快的收敛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing individual and collective strategies: A new approach in metaheuristic optimization

Metaheuristic approaches commonly disregard the individual strategies of each agent within a population, focusing primarily on the collective best solution discovered so far. While this methodology can yield promising results, it also has several significant drawbacks, such as premature convergence. This study introduces a new metaheuristic approach that emphasizes the balance between individual and social learning in agents. In this approach, each agent employs two strategies: an individual search technique performed by the agent and a social or collective strategy involving the best-known solution. The search strategy is considered a learning problem, and agents must adjust the use of both individual and social strategies accordingly. The equilibrium of this adjustment is determined by a counter randomly set for each agent, which determines the frequency of use invested in each strategy. This mechanism promotes diverse search patterns and fosters a dynamic and adaptive process, potentially improving problem-solving efficiency in intricate spaces. The proposed method was assessed by comparing it with several well-established metaheuristic algorithms using 21 test functions. The results demonstrate that the new method surpasses popular metaheuristic algorithms by offering superior solutions and attaining quicker convergence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 数学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
335
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide an international forum for the dissemination of up-to-date information in the fields of the mathematics and computers, in particular (but not exclusively) as they apply to the dynamics of systems, their simulation and scientific computation in general. Published material ranges from short, concise research papers to more general tutorial articles. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, published monthly, is the official organ of IMACS, the International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (Formerly AICA). This Association, founded in 1955 and legally incorporated in 1956 is a member of FIACC (the Five International Associations Coordinating Committee), together with IFIP, IFAV, IFORS and IMEKO. Topics covered by the journal include mathematical tools in: •The foundations of systems modelling •Numerical analysis and the development of algorithms for simulation They also include considerations about computer hardware for simulation and about special software and compilers. The journal also publishes articles concerned with specific applications of modelling and simulation in science and engineering, with relevant applied mathematics, the general philosophy of systems simulation, and their impact on disciplinary and interdisciplinary research. The journal includes a Book Review section -- and a "News on IMACS" section that contains a Calendar of future Conferences/Events and other information about the Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信