Sulaiman Alsheikh , Jie Su , Brian O’Sullivan , Jolie Ringash , John N Waldron , Scott V Bratman , John Cho , Enrique Sanz Garcia , Anna Spreafico , John de Almeida , Ezra Hahn , Andrew Hope , Ali Hosni , John Kim , Andrew McPartlin , Jillian Tsai , Tong Li , Wei Xu , Eugene Yu , Shao Hui Huang
{"title":"喉癌和下咽癌接受确定性（化疗）放疗后，影像识别的结节外扩展的预后价值","authors":"Sulaiman Alsheikh , Jie Su , Brian O’Sullivan , Jolie Ringash , John N Waldron , Scott V Bratman , John Cho , Enrique Sanz Garcia , Anna Spreafico , John de Almeida , Ezra Hahn , Andrew Hope , Ali Hosni , John Kim , Andrew McPartlin , Jillian Tsai , Tong Li , Wei Xu , Eugene Yu , Shao Hui Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Clinical extranodal extension (cENE) is a cN modifier in TNM-8 for laryngo-hypopharygeal carcinoma (LHC). We hypothesize that image-detected ENE (iENE) can provide additional prognostic value over cENE in LHC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Baseline CTs/MRIs of cN+ LHC patients treated with definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy between 2010–2019 were re-reviewed by a neuroradiologist using internationally accepted criteria for iENE-positive/negative (iENE+/iENE–). Overall survival (OS) was compared by iENE status. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to confirm the prognostic value of iENE, adjusted for known potential confounders.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 232 LHC patients were identified, including 154 iENE–/cENE–, 60 iENE+/cENE–, and 18 iENE+/cENE+. A higher proportion of iENE+ (vs iENE–) patients had lymph node (LN) size > 3 cm [53 (67 %) vs 4 (3 %)], >=5 LNs [51 (65 %) vs 33 (21 %)], and retropharyngeal LN [12 (15 %) vs 6 (4 %)] (all p < 0.01). Median follow-up was 4.8 years. iENE+/cENE– and iENE+/cENE+patients had similarly low 5-year OS [28 % (18–44) and 29 % (13–63)] vs iENE–/cENE– [53 % (45–62)] (p < 0.001). On MVA, mortality risk was higher with iENE+vs iENE– [hazard ratio (HR) 2.22 (95 % CI 1.47–3.36)]. The prognostic value of iENE remained with MVA in larynx (n = 124) (HR 2.51 [1.35–4.68], p = 0.004] or hypopharynx (n = 108) (HR 1.87 [1.02–3.43], p = 0.04) patients, separately.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study confirms the independent prognostic importance of iENE for LHC following definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy beyond TNM-8 cN status that already contains the cENE parameter. Further research is needed to explore whether iENE could replace cENE for future cN classification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prognostic value of image-identified extranodal extension in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma following definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Sulaiman Alsheikh , Jie Su , Brian O’Sullivan , Jolie Ringash , John N Waldron , Scott V Bratman , John Cho , Enrique Sanz Garcia , Anna Spreafico , John de Almeida , Ezra Hahn , Andrew Hope , Ali Hosni , John Kim , Andrew McPartlin , Jillian Tsai , Tong Li , Wei Xu , Eugene Yu , Shao Hui Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Clinical extranodal extension (cENE) is a cN modifier in TNM-8 for laryngo-hypopharygeal carcinoma (LHC). We hypothesize that image-detected ENE (iENE) can provide additional prognostic value over cENE in LHC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Baseline CTs/MRIs of cN+ LHC patients treated with definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy between 2010–2019 were re-reviewed by a neuroradiologist using internationally accepted criteria for iENE-positive/negative (iENE+/iENE–). Overall survival (OS) was compared by iENE status. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to confirm the prognostic value of iENE, adjusted for known potential confounders.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 232 LHC patients were identified, including 154 iENE–/cENE–, 60 iENE+/cENE–, and 18 iENE+/cENE+. A higher proportion of iENE+ (vs iENE–) patients had lymph node (LN) size > 3 cm [53 (67 %) vs 4 (3 %)], >=5 LNs [51 (65 %) vs 33 (21 %)], and retropharyngeal LN [12 (15 %) vs 6 (4 %)] (all p < 0.01). Median follow-up was 4.8 years. iENE+/cENE– and iENE+/cENE+patients had similarly low 5-year OS [28 % (18–44) and 29 % (13–63)] vs iENE–/cENE– [53 % (45–62)] (p < 0.001). On MVA, mortality risk was higher with iENE+vs iENE– [hazard ratio (HR) 2.22 (95 % CI 1.47–3.36)]. The prognostic value of iENE remained with MVA in larynx (n = 124) (HR 2.51 [1.35–4.68], p = 0.004] or hypopharynx (n = 108) (HR 1.87 [1.02–3.43], p = 0.04) patients, separately.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study confirms the independent prognostic importance of iENE for LHC following definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy beyond TNM-8 cN status that already contains the cENE parameter. Further research is needed to explore whether iENE could replace cENE for future cN classification.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":4,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837524003257\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837524003257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The prognostic value of image-identified extranodal extension in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma following definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy
Objectives
Clinical extranodal extension (cENE) is a cN modifier in TNM-8 for laryngo-hypopharygeal carcinoma (LHC). We hypothesize that image-detected ENE (iENE) can provide additional prognostic value over cENE in LHC.
Methods
Baseline CTs/MRIs of cN+ LHC patients treated with definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy between 2010–2019 were re-reviewed by a neuroradiologist using internationally accepted criteria for iENE-positive/negative (iENE+/iENE–). Overall survival (OS) was compared by iENE status. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to confirm the prognostic value of iENE, adjusted for known potential confounders.
Results
A total of 232 LHC patients were identified, including 154 iENE–/cENE–, 60 iENE+/cENE–, and 18 iENE+/cENE+. A higher proportion of iENE+ (vs iENE–) patients had lymph node (LN) size > 3 cm [53 (67 %) vs 4 (3 %)], >=5 LNs [51 (65 %) vs 33 (21 %)], and retropharyngeal LN [12 (15 %) vs 6 (4 %)] (all p < 0.01). Median follow-up was 4.8 years. iENE+/cENE– and iENE+/cENE+patients had similarly low 5-year OS [28 % (18–44) and 29 % (13–63)] vs iENE–/cENE– [53 % (45–62)] (p < 0.001). On MVA, mortality risk was higher with iENE+vs iENE– [hazard ratio (HR) 2.22 (95 % CI 1.47–3.36)]. The prognostic value of iENE remained with MVA in larynx (n = 124) (HR 2.51 [1.35–4.68], p = 0.004] or hypopharynx (n = 108) (HR 1.87 [1.02–3.43], p = 0.04) patients, separately.
Conclusions
Our study confirms the independent prognostic importance of iENE for LHC following definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy beyond TNM-8 cN status that already contains the cENE parameter. Further research is needed to explore whether iENE could replace cENE for future cN classification.
期刊介绍：
ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
