重新定义全身性免疫球蛋白 AL 淀粉样变性的心脏受累情况和治疗目标。

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Aldostefano Porcari, Ambra Masi, Ana Martinez-Naharro, Yousuf Razvi, Rishi Patel, Adam Ioannou, Muhammad U Rauf, Giulio Sinigiani, Brendan Wisniowski, Stefano Filisetti, Jasmine Currie-Cathey, Sophie O'Beara, Tushar Kotecha, Dan Knight, James C Moon, Gianfranco Sinagra, Ruta Virsinskaite, Janet Gilbertson, Lucia Venneri, Aviva Petrie, Helen Lachmann, Carol Whelan, Peter Kellman, Sriram Ravichandran, Oliver Cohen, Shameem Mahmood, Charlotte Manisty, Philip N Hawkins, Julian D Gillmore, Ashutosh D Wechalekar, Marianna Fontana
{"title":"重新定义全身性免疫球蛋白 AL 淀粉样变性的心脏受累情况和治疗目标。","authors":"Aldostefano Porcari, Ambra Masi, Ana Martinez-Naharro, Yousuf Razvi, Rishi Patel, Adam Ioannou, Muhammad U Rauf, Giulio Sinigiani, Brendan Wisniowski, Stefano Filisetti, Jasmine Currie-Cathey, Sophie O'Beara, Tushar Kotecha, Dan Knight, James C Moon, Gianfranco Sinagra, Ruta Virsinskaite, Janet Gilbertson, Lucia Venneri, Aviva Petrie, Helen Lachmann, Carol Whelan, Peter Kellman, Sriram Ravichandran, Oliver Cohen, Shameem Mahmood, Charlotte Manisty, Philip N Hawkins, Julian D Gillmore, Ashutosh D Wechalekar, Marianna Fontana","doi":"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cardiac amyloid infiltration is the key determinant of survival in systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. Current guidelines recommend early switching therapy in patients with a nonoptimal or suboptimal response regardless of the extent of cardiac amyloid infiltration.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the differences between serum biomarkers, echocardiography, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with extracellular volume (ECV) mapping in characterizing cardiac amyloid, the independent prognostic role of these approaches, and the role of ECV mapping to guide treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with systemic AL amyloidosis (2015-2021) underwent echocardiography, cardiac biomarkers, and CMR with ECV mapping at diagnosis. Data were analyzed from January to June 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes of the study were all-cause mortality and hematological response as defined according to validated criteria: no response (NR), partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), and complete response (CR). Secondary outcomes were the depth and speed of hematological response and overall survival according to ECV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 560 patients with AL amyloidosis, the median (IQR) age was 68 years (59-74 years); 346 patients were male (61.8%) and 214 female (38.2%). Over a median (IQR) 40.5 months 9-58 months), ECV was independently associated with mortality. In the landmark analysis at 1 month, long-term survival was independent of the achieved hematological response in ECV less than 0.30% and ECV of 0.31% to 0.40%, while it was dependent on the depth of the hematological response in ECV greater than 0.40%. In the landmark analysis at 6 months, survival was independent of the achieved hematological response in ECV less than 0.30% and dependent on achieving at least PR in ECV of 0.31% to 0.40%. Survival was dependent on achieving CR in ECV of 0.41% to 0.50% and ECV greater than 0.50%. Achieving a deep hematological response at 1 month was associated with better survival compared with 6 months in patients with ECV greater than 0.40% but not with ECV less than 0.40%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that ECV mapping, in systemic AL amyloidosis, is an independent predictor of prognosis, can help define the hematological response associated with better long-term outcomes for each patient and potentially inform treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14657,"journal":{"name":"JAMA cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"982-989"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redefining Cardiac Involvement and Targets of Treatment in Systemic Immunoglobulin AL Amyloidosis.\",\"authors\":\"Aldostefano Porcari, Ambra Masi, Ana Martinez-Naharro, Yousuf Razvi, Rishi Patel, Adam Ioannou, Muhammad U Rauf, Giulio Sinigiani, Brendan Wisniowski, Stefano Filisetti, Jasmine Currie-Cathey, Sophie O'Beara, Tushar Kotecha, Dan Knight, James C Moon, Gianfranco Sinagra, Ruta Virsinskaite, Janet Gilbertson, Lucia Venneri, Aviva Petrie, Helen Lachmann, Carol Whelan, Peter Kellman, Sriram Ravichandran, Oliver Cohen, Shameem Mahmood, Charlotte Manisty, Philip N Hawkins, Julian D Gillmore, Ashutosh D Wechalekar, Marianna Fontana\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cardiac amyloid infiltration is the key determinant of survival in systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. Current guidelines recommend early switching therapy in patients with a nonoptimal or suboptimal response regardless of the extent of cardiac amyloid infiltration.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the differences between serum biomarkers, echocardiography, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with extracellular volume (ECV) mapping in characterizing cardiac amyloid, the independent prognostic role of these approaches, and the role of ECV mapping to guide treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with systemic AL amyloidosis (2015-2021) underwent echocardiography, cardiac biomarkers, and CMR with ECV mapping at diagnosis. Data were analyzed from January to June 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes of the study were all-cause mortality and hematological response as defined according to validated criteria: no response (NR), partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), and complete response (CR). Secondary outcomes were the depth and speed of hematological response and overall survival according to ECV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 560 patients with AL amyloidosis, the median (IQR) age was 68 years (59-74 years); 346 patients were male (61.8%) and 214 female (38.2%). Over a median (IQR) 40.5 months 9-58 months), ECV was independently associated with mortality. In the landmark analysis at 1 month, long-term survival was independent of the achieved hematological response in ECV less than 0.30% and ECV of 0.31% to 0.40%, while it was dependent on the depth of the hematological response in ECV greater than 0.40%. In the landmark analysis at 6 months, survival was independent of the achieved hematological response in ECV less than 0.30% and dependent on achieving at least PR in ECV of 0.31% to 0.40%. Survival was dependent on achieving CR in ECV of 0.41% to 0.50% and ECV greater than 0.50%. Achieving a deep hematological response at 1 month was associated with better survival compared with 6 months in patients with ECV greater than 0.40% but not with ECV less than 0.40%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that ECV mapping, in systemic AL amyloidosis, is an independent predictor of prognosis, can help define the hematological response associated with better long-term outcomes for each patient and potentially inform treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"982-989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339700/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2555\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2555","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:心脏淀粉样蛋白浸润是决定全身性轻链(AL)淀粉样变性存活的关键因素。目前的指南建议,无论心脏淀粉样蛋白浸润程度如何,非最佳或次佳反应患者都应尽早更换治疗方案:目的:评估血清生物标志物、超声心动图和心血管磁共振(CMR)与细胞外容积(ECV)图谱在表征心脏淀粉样蛋白方面的差异、这些方法的独立预后作用以及ECV图谱在指导治疗策略方面的作用:新诊断为系统性AL淀粉样变性的连续患者(2015-2021年)在诊断时接受了超声心动图、心脏生物标记物和带有ECV图谱的CMR检查。数据分析时间为 2024 年 1 月至 6 月:研究的主要结果是全因死亡率和根据有效标准定义的血液学反应:无反应(NR)、部分反应(PR)、非常好的部分反应(VGPR)和完全反应(CR)。次要结果是血液学反应的深度和速度,以及根据 ECV 确定的总生存期:在560名AL淀粉样变性患者中,中位(IQR)年龄为68岁(59-74岁);男性346人(61.8%),女性214人(38.2%)。在中位数(IQR)为 40.5 个月 9-58 个月的时间里,ECV 与死亡率密切相关。在1个月的标志性分析中,ECV小于0.30%和ECV为0.31%至0.40%的患者的长期生存率与所达到的血液学反应无关,而ECV大于0.40%的患者的长期生存率则取决于血液学反应的深度。在6个月的标志性分析中,在ECV小于0.30%的情况下,存活率与血液学反应无关,而在ECV为0.31%至0.40%的情况下,存活率取决于至少达到PR。在ECV为0.41%至0.50%和ECV大于0.50%的情况下,存活率取决于是否达到CR。与6个月相比,ECV大于0.40%但ECV小于0.40%的患者在1个月时获得深度血液学反应与更好的生存率相关:本研究发现,在全身性 AL 淀粉样变性中,ECV 图谱是预后的独立预测指标,有助于确定与每位患者更好的长期预后相关的血液学反应,并有可能为治疗策略提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Redefining Cardiac Involvement and Targets of Treatment in Systemic Immunoglobulin AL Amyloidosis.

Importance: Cardiac amyloid infiltration is the key determinant of survival in systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. Current guidelines recommend early switching therapy in patients with a nonoptimal or suboptimal response regardless of the extent of cardiac amyloid infiltration.

Objective: To assess the differences between serum biomarkers, echocardiography, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with extracellular volume (ECV) mapping in characterizing cardiac amyloid, the independent prognostic role of these approaches, and the role of ECV mapping to guide treatment strategies.

Design, setting, and participants: Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with systemic AL amyloidosis (2015-2021) underwent echocardiography, cardiac biomarkers, and CMR with ECV mapping at diagnosis. Data were analyzed from January to June 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes of the study were all-cause mortality and hematological response as defined according to validated criteria: no response (NR), partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), and complete response (CR). Secondary outcomes were the depth and speed of hematological response and overall survival according to ECV.

Results: Of 560 patients with AL amyloidosis, the median (IQR) age was 68 years (59-74 years); 346 patients were male (61.8%) and 214 female (38.2%). Over a median (IQR) 40.5 months 9-58 months), ECV was independently associated with mortality. In the landmark analysis at 1 month, long-term survival was independent of the achieved hematological response in ECV less than 0.30% and ECV of 0.31% to 0.40%, while it was dependent on the depth of the hematological response in ECV greater than 0.40%. In the landmark analysis at 6 months, survival was independent of the achieved hematological response in ECV less than 0.30% and dependent on achieving at least PR in ECV of 0.31% to 0.40%. Survival was dependent on achieving CR in ECV of 0.41% to 0.50% and ECV greater than 0.50%. Achieving a deep hematological response at 1 month was associated with better survival compared with 6 months in patients with ECV greater than 0.40% but not with ECV less than 0.40%.

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that ECV mapping, in systemic AL amyloidosis, is an independent predictor of prognosis, can help define the hematological response associated with better long-term outcomes for each patient and potentially inform treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA cardiology
JAMA cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
45.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
264
期刊介绍: JAMA Cardiology, an international peer-reviewed journal, serves as the premier publication for clinical investigators, clinicians, and trainees in cardiovascular medicine worldwide. As a member of the JAMA Network, it aligns with a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications. Published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues annually, JAMA Cardiology attracts over 4.3 million annual article views and downloads. Research articles become freely accessible online 12 months post-publication without any author fees. Moreover, the online version is readily accessible to institutions in developing countries through the World Health Organization's HINARI program. Positioned at the intersection of clinical investigation, actionable clinical science, and clinical practice, JAMA Cardiology prioritizes traditional and evolving cardiovascular medicine, alongside evidence-based health policy. It places particular emphasis on health equity, especially when grounded in original science, as a top editorial priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信