评估波生坦风险最小化措施的实施情况:一项回顾性研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2391497
Daji Alyami, Ahmed H Abdelazeem, Adel A Alrwisan
{"title":"评估波生坦风险最小化措施的实施情况:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Daji Alyami, Ahmed H Abdelazeem, Adel A Alrwisan","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2391497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bosentan is associated with adverse hepatic effects. To minimize such risk, regulators implemented risk minimization measures (RMMs), including testing for liver injury biomarkers (alanine and aspartate transaminase and bilirubin) prior to therapy initiation and monthly throughout therapy. This study aimed to examine the adherence to hepatic monitoring requirements.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study collected data about bosentan new-users from the Real-world Evidence Research Network from 2016 to 2022. We ascertained hepatic tests from laboratory files. Adherence to RMM definition was performing the required tests within 90 days before initiation and categorized adherence to monthly testing requirement based on the expected number of tests throughout therapy as low (<50%), moderate (50-74%), and high (≥75%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred patients entered the study cohort and 71% were females, with a median age of 25 years. Adherence to testing prior to bosentan initiation was 60%. Adherence to monthly testing was low in the majority of patients (58.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adherence to bosentan RMMs relevant to minimizing risk of hepatotoxicity either before starting or throughout therapy was low. Our findings could be used as a baseline for monitoring trends in implementation of RMMs over time or to compare performance of various minimization strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1035-1038"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the implementation of risk minimization measures for bosentan: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Daji Alyami, Ahmed H Abdelazeem, Adel A Alrwisan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2391497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bosentan is associated with adverse hepatic effects. To minimize such risk, regulators implemented risk minimization measures (RMMs), including testing for liver injury biomarkers (alanine and aspartate transaminase and bilirubin) prior to therapy initiation and monthly throughout therapy. This study aimed to examine the adherence to hepatic monitoring requirements.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study collected data about bosentan new-users from the Real-world Evidence Research Network from 2016 to 2022. We ascertained hepatic tests from laboratory files. Adherence to RMM definition was performing the required tests within 90 days before initiation and categorized adherence to monthly testing requirement based on the expected number of tests throughout therapy as low (<50%), moderate (50-74%), and high (≥75%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred patients entered the study cohort and 71% were females, with a median age of 25 years. Adherence to testing prior to bosentan initiation was 60%. Adherence to monthly testing was low in the majority of patients (58.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adherence to bosentan RMMs relevant to minimizing risk of hepatotoxicity either before starting or throughout therapy was low. Our findings could be used as a baseline for monitoring trends in implementation of RMMs over time or to compare performance of various minimization strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1035-1038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2391497\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2391497","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景波生坦与肝脏不良反应有关。为了最大限度地降低这种风险,监管机构实施了风险最小化措施(RMMs),包括在开始治疗前和整个治疗期间每月检测肝损伤生物标志物(丙氨酸和天门冬氨酸转氨酶及胆红素)。本研究旨在考察肝脏监测要求的遵守情况:这项回顾性队列研究从真实世界证据研究网络收集了2016年至2022年期间波生坦新用户的数据。我们从实验室档案中确定了肝功能检测。RMM定义的依从性是在开始治疗前90天内进行所需的检测,并根据整个治疗过程中的预期检测次数将每月检测要求的依从性归为低(结果:100 名患者加入了研究队列,其中 71% 为女性,中位年龄为 25 岁。在开始使用波生坦之前进行检测的依从性为 60%。大多数患者(58.2%)对每月检测的依从性较低:结论:无论是在开始治疗前还是在整个治疗过程中,与最大限度降低肝毒性风险相关的波生坦 RMM 的依从性都很低。我们的研究结果可作为监测RMM实施趋势的基线,或用于比较各种最小化策略的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the implementation of risk minimization measures for bosentan: a retrospective study.

Background: Bosentan is associated with adverse hepatic effects. To minimize such risk, regulators implemented risk minimization measures (RMMs), including testing for liver injury biomarkers (alanine and aspartate transaminase and bilirubin) prior to therapy initiation and monthly throughout therapy. This study aimed to examine the adherence to hepatic monitoring requirements.

Research design and methods: This retrospective cohort study collected data about bosentan new-users from the Real-world Evidence Research Network from 2016 to 2022. We ascertained hepatic tests from laboratory files. Adherence to RMM definition was performing the required tests within 90 days before initiation and categorized adherence to monthly testing requirement based on the expected number of tests throughout therapy as low (<50%), moderate (50-74%), and high (≥75%).

Results: One hundred patients entered the study cohort and 71% were females, with a median age of 25 years. Adherence to testing prior to bosentan initiation was 60%. Adherence to monthly testing was low in the majority of patients (58.2%).

Conclusions: Adherence to bosentan RMMs relevant to minimizing risk of hepatotoxicity either before starting or throughout therapy was low. Our findings could be used as a baseline for monitoring trends in implementation of RMMs over time or to compare performance of various minimization strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信