{"title":"接受公共援助的晚期慢性肾病患者:接受日本肾病研究创新网络调查人员关于肾脏替代疗法选择和多药治疗介绍的启示。","authors":"Yoshihiro Nakamura, Sho Sasaki, Takahiro Imaizumi, Hiroki Nishiwaki, Minoru Murakami, Masahiko Yazawa, Yoshihiko Raita, Hiroo Kawarazaki, Hideaki Shimizu, Yosuke Saka, Naoho Takizawa, Yoshiro Fujita","doi":"10.1007/s10157-024-02549-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The characteristics of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are recipients of public assistance in Japan, and the adequacy of their medical care have not been reported previously.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of patients with CKD stage G5 who visited nine facilities in Japan from April to June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed to compare the characteristics and care of recipients of public assistance with those of non-recipients. Receiving a presentation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) options and polypharmacy were used as indicators of suboptimal medical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 592 patients included in this analysis (mean age, 69.6 years; male, 59.3%), 56 (9.5%) were recipients of public assistance and 536 (90.5%) were non-recipients of public assistance. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus, unmarried status, and living alone were higher in recipients of public assistance. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, compared with non-recipients of public assistance, recipients of public assistance were less likely to receive a presentation of KRT options (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.56), and were more likely to receive ≥ 10 (aOR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.05-3.51), and ≥ 15 (aOR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.23-6.26) types of medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with advanced CKD receiving public assistance were less likely to receive a presentation of KRT options and more likely to receive ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 types of medication, suggesting that recipients of public assistance are more likely to receive suboptimal medical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recipients of public assistance with advanced chronic kidney disease: insights into receiving a presentation of kidney replacement therapy options and polypharmacy from Japanese investigators with innovative network about kidney disease study.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshihiro Nakamura, Sho Sasaki, Takahiro Imaizumi, Hiroki Nishiwaki, Minoru Murakami, Masahiko Yazawa, Yoshihiko Raita, Hiroo Kawarazaki, Hideaki Shimizu, Yosuke Saka, Naoho Takizawa, Yoshiro Fujita\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10157-024-02549-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The characteristics of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are recipients of public assistance in Japan, and the adequacy of their medical care have not been reported previously.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of patients with CKD stage G5 who visited nine facilities in Japan from April to June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed to compare the characteristics and care of recipients of public assistance with those of non-recipients. Receiving a presentation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) options and polypharmacy were used as indicators of suboptimal medical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 592 patients included in this analysis (mean age, 69.6 years; male, 59.3%), 56 (9.5%) were recipients of public assistance and 536 (90.5%) were non-recipients of public assistance. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus, unmarried status, and living alone were higher in recipients of public assistance. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, compared with non-recipients of public assistance, recipients of public assistance were less likely to receive a presentation of KRT options (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.56), and were more likely to receive ≥ 10 (aOR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.05-3.51), and ≥ 15 (aOR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.23-6.26) types of medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with advanced CKD receiving public assistance were less likely to receive a presentation of KRT options and more likely to receive ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 types of medication, suggesting that recipients of public assistance are more likely to receive suboptimal medical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02549-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02549-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recipients of public assistance with advanced chronic kidney disease: insights into receiving a presentation of kidney replacement therapy options and polypharmacy from Japanese investigators with innovative network about kidney disease study.
Background: The characteristics of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are recipients of public assistance in Japan, and the adequacy of their medical care have not been reported previously.
Methods: The records of patients with CKD stage G5 who visited nine facilities in Japan from April to June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed to compare the characteristics and care of recipients of public assistance with those of non-recipients. Receiving a presentation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) options and polypharmacy were used as indicators of suboptimal medical care.
Results: Of the 592 patients included in this analysis (mean age, 69.6 years; male, 59.3%), 56 (9.5%) were recipients of public assistance and 536 (90.5%) were non-recipients of public assistance. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus, unmarried status, and living alone were higher in recipients of public assistance. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, compared with non-recipients of public assistance, recipients of public assistance were less likely to receive a presentation of KRT options (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.56), and were more likely to receive ≥ 10 (aOR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.05-3.51), and ≥ 15 (aOR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.23-6.26) types of medication.
Conclusions: Patients with advanced CKD receiving public assistance were less likely to receive a presentation of KRT options and more likely to receive ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 types of medication, suggesting that recipients of public assistance are more likely to receive suboptimal medical care.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.