经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者服用芪参益气滴丸的有效性和安全性:一项多中心队列研究的 3 年结果。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1007/s11655-024-3664-1
Rui-Na Bai, Feng Gu, Qian-Zi Che, Xuan Zhang, Ya-Jie Cai, Rui-Xi Xi, Yang Zhao, Ming Guo, Guo-Ju Dong, Zhu-Ye Gao, Chang-Geng Fu, Pei-Li Wang, Jian-Peng Du, Da-Wu Zhang, Wen-Hui Duan, Li-Zhi Li, Qiao-Ning Yang, Da-Zhuo Shi
{"title":"经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者服用芪参益气滴丸的有效性和安全性:一项多中心队列研究的 3 年结果。","authors":"Rui-Na Bai, Feng Gu, Qian-Zi Che, Xuan Zhang, Ya-Jie Cai, Rui-Xi Xi, Yang Zhao, Ming Guo, Guo-Ju Dong, Zhu-Ye Gao, Chang-Geng Fu, Pei-Li Wang, Jian-Peng Du, Da-Wu Zhang, Wen-Hui Duan, Li-Zhi Li, Qiao-Ning Yang, Da-Zhuo Shi","doi":"10.1007/s11655-024-3664-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Qishen Yiqi Dripping Pill (QSYQ) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted at 40 centers in China. Patients with ACS after PCI entered either the QSYQ or Western medicine (WM) groups naturally based on whether they had received QSYQ before enrollment. QSYQ group received QSYQ (0.52 g, 3 times a day for 12 months) in addition to WM. The primary endpoint included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization. The secondary endpoint included rehospitalization due to ACS, heart failure, stroke, and other thrombotic events. Quality of life was assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 936 patients completed follow-up of the primary endpoint from February 2012 to December 2018. Overall, 487 patients received QSYQ and WM. During a median follow-up of 566 days (inter quartile range, IQR, 517-602), the primary endpoint occurred in 46 (9.45%) and 65 (14.48%) patients in QSYQ and WM groups respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.90; P=0.013]. The secondary endpoint occurred in 61 (12.53%) and 74 (16.48%) patients in QSYQ and WM groups, respectively (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53-1.09; P=0.136). In sensitivity analysis, the results still demonstrated that WM combined with QSYQ reduced the risk of the primary endpoint (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98; P=0.039). Moreover, QSYQ improved the disease perception domain of the SAQ (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with ACS after PCI, QSYQ combined with WM reduced the incidence of the primary endpoint. These findings provide a promising option for managing ACS after PCI and suggest the potential treatment for reducing the risk of primary endpoint included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization through intermittent administration of QSYQ (Registration No. ChiCTR-OOC-14005552).</p>","PeriodicalId":10005,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and Safety of Qishen Yiqi Dripping Pill in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 3-Year Results from a Multicentre Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Rui-Na Bai, Feng Gu, Qian-Zi Che, Xuan Zhang, Ya-Jie Cai, Rui-Xi Xi, Yang Zhao, Ming Guo, Guo-Ju Dong, Zhu-Ye Gao, Chang-Geng Fu, Pei-Li Wang, Jian-Peng Du, Da-Wu Zhang, Wen-Hui Duan, Li-Zhi Li, Qiao-Ning Yang, Da-Zhuo Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11655-024-3664-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Qishen Yiqi Dripping Pill (QSYQ) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted at 40 centers in China. Patients with ACS after PCI entered either the QSYQ or Western medicine (WM) groups naturally based on whether they had received QSYQ before enrollment. QSYQ group received QSYQ (0.52 g, 3 times a day for 12 months) in addition to WM. The primary endpoint included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization. The secondary endpoint included rehospitalization due to ACS, heart failure, stroke, and other thrombotic events. Quality of life was assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 936 patients completed follow-up of the primary endpoint from February 2012 to December 2018. Overall, 487 patients received QSYQ and WM. During a median follow-up of 566 days (inter quartile range, IQR, 517-602), the primary endpoint occurred in 46 (9.45%) and 65 (14.48%) patients in QSYQ and WM groups respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.90; P=0.013]. The secondary endpoint occurred in 61 (12.53%) and 74 (16.48%) patients in QSYQ and WM groups, respectively (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53-1.09; P=0.136). In sensitivity analysis, the results still demonstrated that WM combined with QSYQ reduced the risk of the primary endpoint (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98; P=0.039). Moreover, QSYQ improved the disease perception domain of the SAQ (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with ACS after PCI, QSYQ combined with WM reduced the incidence of the primary endpoint. These findings provide a promising option for managing ACS after PCI and suggest the potential treatment for reducing the risk of primary endpoint included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization through intermittent administration of QSYQ (Registration No. ChiCTR-OOC-14005552).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-024-3664-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-024-3664-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估芪参益气滴丸(QSYQ)对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的有效性和安全性:这项多中心前瞻性队列研究在中国的40个中心进行。PCI术后急性冠脉综合征患者根据入组前是否接受过QSYQ治疗,自然分为QSYQ组和西药(WM)组。QSYQ组除接受西药治疗外,还接受QSYQ治疗(0.52克,每天3次,持续12个月)。主要终点包括心源性死亡、非致命性心肌梗死和紧急血管重建。次要终点包括因急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭、中风和其他血栓事件导致的再住院。生活质量通过西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)进行评估:自2012年2月至2018年12月,共有936名患者完成了主要终点的随访。共有487名患者接受了QSYQ和WM治疗。在中位随访 566 天(四分位数间距,IQR,517-602)期间,QSYQ 组和 WM 组分别有 46 例(9.45%)和 65 例(14.48%)患者出现主要终点[调整后危险比(HR)为 0.60,95% 置信区间(CI)为 0.41-0.90;P=0.013]。QSYQ组和WM组分别有61例(12.53%)和74例(16.48%)患者出现次要终点(调整后危险比为0.76,95% CI为0.53-1.09;P=0.136)。在敏感性分析中,结果仍显示 WM 联合 QSYQ 降低了主要终点的风险(HR 0.67,95% CI 0.46-0.98;P=0.039)。此外,QSYQ还改善了SAQ的疾病感知域(结论:在PCI后的ACS患者中,QSYQ可以改善疾病感知域:在PCI后的ACS患者中,QSYQ联合WM可降低主要终点的发生率。这些研究结果为PCI术后ACS的治疗提供了一种很有前景的选择,并表明通过间歇给药QSYQ(注册号:ChiCTR-OOC-14005552)可降低主要终点风险,包括心源性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和紧急血管再通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and Safety of Qishen Yiqi Dripping Pill in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 3-Year Results from a Multicentre Cohort Study.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Qishen Yiqi Dripping Pill (QSYQ) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: This multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted at 40 centers in China. Patients with ACS after PCI entered either the QSYQ or Western medicine (WM) groups naturally based on whether they had received QSYQ before enrollment. QSYQ group received QSYQ (0.52 g, 3 times a day for 12 months) in addition to WM. The primary endpoint included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization. The secondary endpoint included rehospitalization due to ACS, heart failure, stroke, and other thrombotic events. Quality of life was assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).

Results: A total of 936 patients completed follow-up of the primary endpoint from February 2012 to December 2018. Overall, 487 patients received QSYQ and WM. During a median follow-up of 566 days (inter quartile range, IQR, 517-602), the primary endpoint occurred in 46 (9.45%) and 65 (14.48%) patients in QSYQ and WM groups respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.90; P=0.013]. The secondary endpoint occurred in 61 (12.53%) and 74 (16.48%) patients in QSYQ and WM groups, respectively (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53-1.09; P=0.136). In sensitivity analysis, the results still demonstrated that WM combined with QSYQ reduced the risk of the primary endpoint (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98; P=0.039). Moreover, QSYQ improved the disease perception domain of the SAQ (P<0.05).

Conclusion: In patients with ACS after PCI, QSYQ combined with WM reduced the incidence of the primary endpoint. These findings provide a promising option for managing ACS after PCI and suggest the potential treatment for reducing the risk of primary endpoint included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization through intermittent administration of QSYQ (Registration No. ChiCTR-OOC-14005552).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
2413
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine seeks to promote international communication and exchange on integrative medicine as well as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and provide a rapid forum for the dissemination of scientific articles focusing on the latest developments and trends as well as experiences and achievements on integrative medicine or CAM in clinical practice, scientific research, education and healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信