有规定的焚烧对入侵者占主导地位的商业放牧稀树草原中的本地草本植被有益还是无益

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1111/aec.13581
Ian J. Radford, Brett N. Abbott, David M. Nicholas, Lindsay Whiteman, Anthony C. Grice
{"title":"有规定的焚烧对入侵者占主导地位的商业放牧稀树草原中的本地草本植被有益还是无益","authors":"Ian J. Radford,&nbsp;Brett N. Abbott,&nbsp;David M. Nicholas,&nbsp;Lindsay Whiteman,&nbsp;Anthony C. Grice","doi":"10.1111/aec.13581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prescribed burning is frequently used in savanna vegetation in Australia and worldwide. In north-east Queensland savanna burning has been proposed for the control of woody weeds including <i>Cryptostegia grandiflora</i> (rubbervine), an invasive shrub/vine of riparian savanna. However, burning as a management tool can have non-target impacts on ecosystems, particularly where associated with additional invasive species, such as the exotic stoloniferous grass species <i>Bothriochloa pertusa</i> (Indian couch). For this reason, an experiment was established to test for non-target impacts of prescribed burning on herbaceous vegetation. The experiment consisted of wet and dry season burning, and single and double burning treatments during a 4 year study. Annual herbaceous surveys were conducted, both before treatments applied, and then annually. We addressed alternative hypotheses, that (i) burning would exacerbate grazing impacts resulting in negative outcomes for native herbaceous vegetation, or alternatively (ii) burning would be neutral or beneficial to native herbaceous assemblages due to savanna co-evolution with fire. Burning treatments resulted in subtle but beneficial responses for native herbaceous vegetation. Native legume biomass, percent composition and percent frequency, and forb species richness, increased 4–5 months following wet season burning with above average rainfall. There was a delayed (8–18 months) positive response of burning (both wet and dry season) in percent composition of native grazing sensitive perennial grasses. There was a slight short-term decline in introduced perennial grass percent composition and biomass following treatment. Results were consistent with predominantly positive or neutral responses to prescribed burning. There was no evidence to support the hypothesis that invaded native savanna herbaceous assemblages declined with burning treatment applications. These results are discussed in relation to other savanna studies in northern Australia and to the role of fire in the maintenance of herbaceous vegetation in savanna biomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.13581","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribed burning beneficial or neutral for native herbaceous vegetation in an invader dominated commercially grazed savanna\",\"authors\":\"Ian J. Radford,&nbsp;Brett N. Abbott,&nbsp;David M. Nicholas,&nbsp;Lindsay Whiteman,&nbsp;Anthony C. Grice\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aec.13581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Prescribed burning is frequently used in savanna vegetation in Australia and worldwide. In north-east Queensland savanna burning has been proposed for the control of woody weeds including <i>Cryptostegia grandiflora</i> (rubbervine), an invasive shrub/vine of riparian savanna. However, burning as a management tool can have non-target impacts on ecosystems, particularly where associated with additional invasive species, such as the exotic stoloniferous grass species <i>Bothriochloa pertusa</i> (Indian couch). For this reason, an experiment was established to test for non-target impacts of prescribed burning on herbaceous vegetation. The experiment consisted of wet and dry season burning, and single and double burning treatments during a 4 year study. Annual herbaceous surveys were conducted, both before treatments applied, and then annually. We addressed alternative hypotheses, that (i) burning would exacerbate grazing impacts resulting in negative outcomes for native herbaceous vegetation, or alternatively (ii) burning would be neutral or beneficial to native herbaceous assemblages due to savanna co-evolution with fire. Burning treatments resulted in subtle but beneficial responses for native herbaceous vegetation. Native legume biomass, percent composition and percent frequency, and forb species richness, increased 4–5 months following wet season burning with above average rainfall. There was a delayed (8–18 months) positive response of burning (both wet and dry season) in percent composition of native grazing sensitive perennial grasses. There was a slight short-term decline in introduced perennial grass percent composition and biomass following treatment. Results were consistent with predominantly positive or neutral responses to prescribed burning. There was no evidence to support the hypothesis that invaded native savanna herbaceous assemblages declined with burning treatment applications. These results are discussed in relation to other savanna studies in northern Australia and to the role of fire in the maintenance of herbaceous vegetation in savanna biomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"49 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.13581\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.13581\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.13581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在澳大利亚和世界各地的热带稀树草原植被中,经常使用规定的焚烧方法。在昆士兰东北部的热带稀树草原,人们建议采用焚烧的方法来控制木本杂草,包括河岸热带稀树草原的入侵灌木/藤本植物 Cryptostegia grandiflora(橡皮藤)。然而,焚烧作为一种管理工具可能会对生态系统产生非目标影响,尤其是在与其他入侵物种(如外来匍匐茎草种 Bothriochloa pertusa(印度榻榻米))相关联的情况下。为此,我们进行了一项实验,以测试规定焚烧对草本植被的非目标影响。实验包括湿季和旱季焚烧,以及为期 4 年的单烧和双烧处理。每年都会进行草本植物调查,包括施药前和施药后。我们提出了两种假设:(i) 焚烧会加剧放牧的影响,从而对本地草本植被造成负面影响;或者 (ii) 由于热带稀树草原与火的共同进化,焚烧对本地草本植物群落是中性或有益的。焚烧处理对本地草本植被产生了微妙但有益的影响。在降雨量高于平均水平的湿季燃烧后 4-5 个月,本地豆科植物的生物量、组成百分比和频率百分比以及禁草物种丰富度都有所增加。焚烧(雨季和旱季)对本地对放牧敏感的多年生草本植物的组成百分比产生了延迟(8-18 个月)的积极反应。处理后,引进的多年生牧草的百分比组成和生物量在短期内略有下降。结果表明,对规定焚烧的反应主要是积极的或中性的。没有证据支持入侵的本地稀树草原草本植物群随着焚烧处理的应用而减少的假设。本文结合澳大利亚北部的其他热带稀树草原研究以及火灾在维持热带稀树草原生物群落草本植被方面的作用,对这些结果进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prescribed burning beneficial or neutral for native herbaceous vegetation in an invader dominated commercially grazed savanna

Prescribed burning beneficial or neutral for native herbaceous vegetation in an invader dominated commercially grazed savanna

Prescribed burning is frequently used in savanna vegetation in Australia and worldwide. In north-east Queensland savanna burning has been proposed for the control of woody weeds including Cryptostegia grandiflora (rubbervine), an invasive shrub/vine of riparian savanna. However, burning as a management tool can have non-target impacts on ecosystems, particularly where associated with additional invasive species, such as the exotic stoloniferous grass species Bothriochloa pertusa (Indian couch). For this reason, an experiment was established to test for non-target impacts of prescribed burning on herbaceous vegetation. The experiment consisted of wet and dry season burning, and single and double burning treatments during a 4 year study. Annual herbaceous surveys were conducted, both before treatments applied, and then annually. We addressed alternative hypotheses, that (i) burning would exacerbate grazing impacts resulting in negative outcomes for native herbaceous vegetation, or alternatively (ii) burning would be neutral or beneficial to native herbaceous assemblages due to savanna co-evolution with fire. Burning treatments resulted in subtle but beneficial responses for native herbaceous vegetation. Native legume biomass, percent composition and percent frequency, and forb species richness, increased 4–5 months following wet season burning with above average rainfall. There was a delayed (8–18 months) positive response of burning (both wet and dry season) in percent composition of native grazing sensitive perennial grasses. There was a slight short-term decline in introduced perennial grass percent composition and biomass following treatment. Results were consistent with predominantly positive or neutral responses to prescribed burning. There was no evidence to support the hypothesis that invaded native savanna herbaceous assemblages declined with burning treatment applications. These results are discussed in relation to other savanna studies in northern Australia and to the role of fire in the maintenance of herbaceous vegetation in savanna biomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信