Elizabeth Boggs, Gregory Misky, Sharon Scarbro, Mark Gritz, Renuka Tipirneni, Richard Lindrooth
{"title":"医疗补助和私人保险患者在出院后随访和再入院风险方面的差异。","authors":"Elizabeth Boggs, Gregory Misky, Sharon Scarbro, Mark Gritz, Renuka Tipirneni, Richard Lindrooth","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have identified higher risk of readmission for patients with Medicaid compared to those with private insurance. Postdischarge follow-up is utilized as an intervention to reduce readmissions in the Medicare population, but it is unclear whether follow-up reduces risk of readmission for patients with Medicaid.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether follow-up within 30 days of discharge reduces risk of readmission and mitigates readmission disparities based upon insurance status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used Cox proportional hazard and competing risk models to estimate associations between sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, follow-up, and readmission. We analyzed data from 4281 patients aged 21-64 years with Medicaid or private insurance who were hospitalized from January 2017 to December 2019 for one of five conditions associated with high risk of readmission. Outpatient follow-up within 30 days of discharge and 30-day all-cause readmission were outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall risk of readmission was similar for Medicaid and privately insured patients in this cohort (13.7% and 14.5%, respectively). Patients with Medicaid were 23% points less likely to complete outpatient follow-up within 30 days compared to patients with private insurance (p < .001). However, outpatient follow-up before readmission within 30 days of discharge was not associated with a significant difference in readmission rate (hazard ratio: 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.91-1.32) in the overall sample or in analysis stratified by payer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found similar rates of readmission for Medicaid and privately insured patients despite significant disparities in postdischarge follow-up. Timely follow-up care alone may not be sufficient as an intervention to reduce readmissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in postdischarge follow-up and risk of readmission between Medicaid and privately insured patients.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Boggs, Gregory Misky, Sharon Scarbro, Mark Gritz, Renuka Tipirneni, Richard Lindrooth\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhm.13486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have identified higher risk of readmission for patients with Medicaid compared to those with private insurance. Postdischarge follow-up is utilized as an intervention to reduce readmissions in the Medicare population, but it is unclear whether follow-up reduces risk of readmission for patients with Medicaid.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether follow-up within 30 days of discharge reduces risk of readmission and mitigates readmission disparities based upon insurance status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used Cox proportional hazard and competing risk models to estimate associations between sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, follow-up, and readmission. We analyzed data from 4281 patients aged 21-64 years with Medicaid or private insurance who were hospitalized from January 2017 to December 2019 for one of five conditions associated with high risk of readmission. Outpatient follow-up within 30 days of discharge and 30-day all-cause readmission were outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall risk of readmission was similar for Medicaid and privately insured patients in this cohort (13.7% and 14.5%, respectively). Patients with Medicaid were 23% points less likely to complete outpatient follow-up within 30 days compared to patients with private insurance (p < .001). However, outpatient follow-up before readmission within 30 days of discharge was not associated with a significant difference in readmission rate (hazard ratio: 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.91-1.32) in the overall sample or in analysis stratified by payer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found similar rates of readmission for Medicaid and privately insured patients despite significant disparities in postdischarge follow-up. Timely follow-up care alone may not be sufficient as an intervention to reduce readmissions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disparities in postdischarge follow-up and risk of readmission between Medicaid and privately insured patients.
Background: Studies have identified higher risk of readmission for patients with Medicaid compared to those with private insurance. Postdischarge follow-up is utilized as an intervention to reduce readmissions in the Medicare population, but it is unclear whether follow-up reduces risk of readmission for patients with Medicaid.
Objective: To assess whether follow-up within 30 days of discharge reduces risk of readmission and mitigates readmission disparities based upon insurance status.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study used Cox proportional hazard and competing risk models to estimate associations between sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, follow-up, and readmission. We analyzed data from 4281 patients aged 21-64 years with Medicaid or private insurance who were hospitalized from January 2017 to December 2019 for one of five conditions associated with high risk of readmission. Outpatient follow-up within 30 days of discharge and 30-day all-cause readmission were outcomes.
Results: Overall risk of readmission was similar for Medicaid and privately insured patients in this cohort (13.7% and 14.5%, respectively). Patients with Medicaid were 23% points less likely to complete outpatient follow-up within 30 days compared to patients with private insurance (p < .001). However, outpatient follow-up before readmission within 30 days of discharge was not associated with a significant difference in readmission rate (hazard ratio: 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.91-1.32) in the overall sample or in analysis stratified by payer.
Conclusions: We found similar rates of readmission for Medicaid and privately insured patients despite significant disparities in postdischarge follow-up. Timely follow-up care alone may not be sufficient as an intervention to reduce readmissions.