化疗患者晨间精力状况不佳与压力水平和恢复力下降有关。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
{"title":"化疗患者晨间精力状况不佳与压力水平和恢复力下降有关。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Evidence suggests that lower levels of morning energy are associated with higher levels of stress and lower levels of resilience in patients receiving chemotherapy. Study purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct morning energy profiles; evaluate for differences among the profiles in demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as measures of stress, resilience, and coping.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 1,343 outpatients receiving chemotherapy completed a demographic questionnaire and measures of global, cancer-related, and cumulative life stress, and resilience at study enrollment. Morning energy was assessed using the Lee Fatigue Scale at six time points over two cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct morning energy profiles. Differences among the subgroups were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three morning energy profiles were identified (i.e., High (17.3%), Low (60.3%), Very Low (22.4%)). Compared to High class, the other two morning energy classes were less likely to be employed; had a lower functional status and a higher comorbidity burden; and were more likely to self-report depression and back pain. For all three types of stress, significant differences were found among the three classes with scores that demonstrated a dose response effect (i.e., High &lt; Low &lt; Very Low; as decrements in morning energy increased, stress scores increased). Compared to High class, Very Low class reported higher rates of physical and sexual abuse. The resilience scores exhibited a dose response effect as well (i.e., High &gt; Low &gt; Very Low). Patients with the two worst energy profiles reported a higher use of disengagement coping strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings highlight the complex relationships among decrements in morning energy, various types of stress, resilience, and coping in patients undergoing chemotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><p>Clinicians need to assess for stress and adverse childhood experiences to develop individualized management plans to increase patients’ energy levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124001931/pdfft?md5=01c3af072991dc72cadbf8f4598dd6dc&pid=1-s2.0-S0749208124001931-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worse Morning Energy Profiles Are Associated with Significant Levels of Stress and Decrements in Resilience in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Evidence suggests that lower levels of morning energy are associated with higher levels of stress and lower levels of resilience in patients receiving chemotherapy. Study purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct morning energy profiles; evaluate for differences among the profiles in demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as measures of stress, resilience, and coping.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 1,343 outpatients receiving chemotherapy completed a demographic questionnaire and measures of global, cancer-related, and cumulative life stress, and resilience at study enrollment. Morning energy was assessed using the Lee Fatigue Scale at six time points over two cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct morning energy profiles. Differences among the subgroups were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three morning energy profiles were identified (i.e., High (17.3%), Low (60.3%), Very Low (22.4%)). Compared to High class, the other two morning energy classes were less likely to be employed; had a lower functional status and a higher comorbidity burden; and were more likely to self-report depression and back pain. For all three types of stress, significant differences were found among the three classes with scores that demonstrated a dose response effect (i.e., High &lt; Low &lt; Very Low; as decrements in morning energy increased, stress scores increased). Compared to High class, Very Low class reported higher rates of physical and sexual abuse. The resilience scores exhibited a dose response effect as well (i.e., High &gt; Low &gt; Very Low). Patients with the two worst energy profiles reported a higher use of disengagement coping strategies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings highlight the complex relationships among decrements in morning energy, various types of stress, resilience, and coping in patients undergoing chemotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><p>Clinicians need to assess for stress and adverse childhood experiences to develop individualized management plans to increase patients’ energy levels.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124001931/pdfft?md5=01c3af072991dc72cadbf8f4598dd6dc&pid=1-s2.0-S0749208124001931-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124001931\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208124001931","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的有证据表明,接受化疗的患者晨间能量水平较低与压力水平较高和复原力水平较低有关。研究目的是确定具有不同晨间能量特征的患者亚群;评估不同特征的患者在人口统计学和临床特征以及压力、复原力和应对措施方面的差异:共有 1,343 名接受化疗的门诊患者填写了一份人口统计学问卷,并在入组时测量了整体、癌症相关、累积性生活压力和复原力。在两个化疗周期的六个时间点,使用李氏疲劳量表对患者的晨间精力进行评估。通过潜伏特征分析,确定了具有不同晨间能量特征的患者亚组。使用参数和非参数检验对亚组之间的差异进行评估:确定了三种晨间能量特征(即高(17.3%)、低(60.3%)和极低(22.4%))。与 "精力充沛 "组相比,其他两个 "精力充沛 "组受雇的可能性较低;功能状况较差,合并症负担较重;自我报告抑郁和背痛的可能性较大。在所有三种压力类型中,三个等级的得分都存在显著差异,并表现出剂量反应效应(即高 < 低 < 非常低;随着晨间能量下降幅度的增加,压力得分也随之增加)。与 "高 "组相比,"极低 "组报告的身体虐待和性虐待的比例更高。复原力得分也表现出剂量反应效应(即高 > 低 > 非常低)。能量状况最差的两个等级的患者使用脱离应对策略的比例较高:研究结果凸显了化疗患者晨间能量下降、各种类型的压力、复原力和应对策略之间的复杂关系:护理实践的启示:临床医生需要评估压力和不良童年经历,以制定个性化的管理计划,提高患者的精力水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Worse Morning Energy Profiles Are Associated with Significant Levels of Stress and Decrements in Resilience in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

Objectives

Evidence suggests that lower levels of morning energy are associated with higher levels of stress and lower levels of resilience in patients receiving chemotherapy. Study purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct morning energy profiles; evaluate for differences among the profiles in demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as measures of stress, resilience, and coping.

Methods

A total of 1,343 outpatients receiving chemotherapy completed a demographic questionnaire and measures of global, cancer-related, and cumulative life stress, and resilience at study enrollment. Morning energy was assessed using the Lee Fatigue Scale at six time points over two cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct morning energy profiles. Differences among the subgroups were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

Results

Three morning energy profiles were identified (i.e., High (17.3%), Low (60.3%), Very Low (22.4%)). Compared to High class, the other two morning energy classes were less likely to be employed; had a lower functional status and a higher comorbidity burden; and were more likely to self-report depression and back pain. For all three types of stress, significant differences were found among the three classes with scores that demonstrated a dose response effect (i.e., High < Low < Very Low; as decrements in morning energy increased, stress scores increased). Compared to High class, Very Low class reported higher rates of physical and sexual abuse. The resilience scores exhibited a dose response effect as well (i.e., High > Low > Very Low). Patients with the two worst energy profiles reported a higher use of disengagement coping strategies.

Conclusions

Findings highlight the complex relationships among decrements in morning energy, various types of stress, resilience, and coping in patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Implications for Nursing Practice

Clinicians need to assess for stress and adverse childhood experiences to develop individualized management plans to increase patients’ energy levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信