基于机器学习的主动脉夹层院内死亡率预后模型:从重症监护医学的角度看问题。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241269450
Jiahao Lei, Zhuojing Zhang, Yixuan Li, Zhaoyu Wu, Hongji Pu, Zhijue Xu, Xinrui Yang, Jiateng Hu, Guang Liu, Peng Qiu, Tao Chen, Xinwu Lu
{"title":"基于机器学习的主动脉夹层院内死亡率预后模型:从重症监护医学的角度看问题。","authors":"Jiahao Lei, Zhuojing Zhang, Yixuan Li, Zhaoyu Wu, Hongji Pu, Zhijue Xu, Xinrui Yang, Jiateng Hu, Guang Liu, Peng Qiu, Tao Chen, Xinwu Lu","doi":"10.1177/20552076241269450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aortic dissection (AD) is a severe emergency with high morbidity and mortality, necessitating strict monitoring and management. This retrospective study aimed to identify prognostic factors and establish predictive models for in-hospital mortality among AD patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved ICU admission records of AD patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV critical care data set and the eICU Collaborative Research Database. Functional data analysis was further applied to estimate continuous vital sign processes, and variables associated with in-hospital mortality were identified through univariate analyses. Subsequently, we employed multivariable logistic regression and machine learning techniques, including simple decision tree, random forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to develop prognostic models for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Given 643 ICU admissions from MIMIC-IV and 501 admissions from eICU, 29 and 28 prognostic factors were identified from each database through univariate analyses, respectively. For prognostic model construction, 507 MIMIC-IV admissions were divided into 406 (80%) for training and 101 (20%) for internal validation, and 87 eICU admissions were included as an external validation group. Of the four models tested, the RF consistently exhibited the best performance among different variable subsets, boasting area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.870 and 0.850. The models highlighted the mean 24-h fluid intake as the most potent prognostic factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current prognostic models effectively forecasted in-hospital mortality among AD patients, and they pinpointed noteworthy prognostic factors, including initial blood pressure upon ICU admission and mean 24-h fluid intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-based prognostic model for in-hospital mortality of aortic dissection: Insights from an intensive care medicine perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Jiahao Lei, Zhuojing Zhang, Yixuan Li, Zhaoyu Wu, Hongji Pu, Zhijue Xu, Xinrui Yang, Jiateng Hu, Guang Liu, Peng Qiu, Tao Chen, Xinwu Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076241269450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aortic dissection (AD) is a severe emergency with high morbidity and mortality, necessitating strict monitoring and management. This retrospective study aimed to identify prognostic factors and establish predictive models for in-hospital mortality among AD patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved ICU admission records of AD patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV critical care data set and the eICU Collaborative Research Database. Functional data analysis was further applied to estimate continuous vital sign processes, and variables associated with in-hospital mortality were identified through univariate analyses. Subsequently, we employed multivariable logistic regression and machine learning techniques, including simple decision tree, random forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to develop prognostic models for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Given 643 ICU admissions from MIMIC-IV and 501 admissions from eICU, 29 and 28 prognostic factors were identified from each database through univariate analyses, respectively. For prognostic model construction, 507 MIMIC-IV admissions were divided into 406 (80%) for training and 101 (20%) for internal validation, and 87 eICU admissions were included as an external validation group. Of the four models tested, the RF consistently exhibited the best performance among different variable subsets, boasting area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.870 and 0.850. The models highlighted the mean 24-h fluid intake as the most potent prognostic factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current prognostic models effectively forecasted in-hospital mortality among AD patients, and they pinpointed noteworthy prognostic factors, including initial blood pressure upon ICU admission and mean 24-h fluid intake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334245/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241269450\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241269450","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:主动脉夹层(AD)是一种发病率和死亡率都很高的严重急症,需要严格的监测和管理。这项回顾性研究旨在确定预后因素,并建立重症监护病房(ICU)主动脉夹层患者院内死亡率的预测模型:方法:我们从重症监护医学信息市场(MIMIC)-IV 重症监护数据集和 eICU 合作研究数据库中检索了 AD 患者的 ICU 入院记录。进一步应用功能数据分析估算连续生命体征过程,并通过单变量分析确定与院内死亡率相关的变量。随后,我们采用了多变量逻辑回归和机器学习技术,包括简单决策树、随机森林(RF)和极梯度提升(XGBoost),来建立院内死亡率的预后模型:在MIMIC-IV的643例ICU入院病例和eICU的501例入院病例中,通过单变量分析分别从两个数据库中找出了29个和28个预后因素。在构建预后模型时,507 例 MIMIC-IV 住院病例分为 406 例(80%)用于训练,101 例(20%)用于内部验证,87 例 eICU 住院病例作为外部验证组。在测试的四个模型中,射频模型在不同的变量子集中始终表现出最佳性能,其接收器操作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.870 和 0.850。这些模型强调 24 小时平均液体摄入量是最有效的预后因素:结论:目前的预后模型能有效预测 AD 患者的院内死亡率,并指出了值得注意的预后因素,包括入院时的初始血压和 24 小时平均液体摄入量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning-based prognostic model for in-hospital mortality of aortic dissection: Insights from an intensive care medicine perspective.

Objective: Aortic dissection (AD) is a severe emergency with high morbidity and mortality, necessitating strict monitoring and management. This retrospective study aimed to identify prognostic factors and establish predictive models for in-hospital mortality among AD patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: We retrieved ICU admission records of AD patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV critical care data set and the eICU Collaborative Research Database. Functional data analysis was further applied to estimate continuous vital sign processes, and variables associated with in-hospital mortality were identified through univariate analyses. Subsequently, we employed multivariable logistic regression and machine learning techniques, including simple decision tree, random forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to develop prognostic models for in-hospital mortality.

Results: Given 643 ICU admissions from MIMIC-IV and 501 admissions from eICU, 29 and 28 prognostic factors were identified from each database through univariate analyses, respectively. For prognostic model construction, 507 MIMIC-IV admissions were divided into 406 (80%) for training and 101 (20%) for internal validation, and 87 eICU admissions were included as an external validation group. Of the four models tested, the RF consistently exhibited the best performance among different variable subsets, boasting area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.870 and 0.850. The models highlighted the mean 24-h fluid intake as the most potent prognostic factor.

Conclusions: The current prognostic models effectively forecasted in-hospital mortality among AD patients, and they pinpointed noteworthy prognostic factors, including initial blood pressure upon ICU admission and mean 24-h fluid intake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信