肿瘤科护士的沟通能力、专业自主性和临床推理能力之间的关系。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70003
Suyeon Noh, Younhee Kang
{"title":"肿瘤科护士的沟通能力、专业自主性和临床推理能力之间的关系。","authors":"Suyeon Noh, Younhee Kang","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the relationships among communication competence, professional autonomy and clinical reasoning and to identify the factors that influence clinical reasoning competence in oncology nurses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional descriptive design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included 147 oncology nurses with more than a year of clinical experience in cancer wards. The Global Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale, Schutzenhofer Professional Autonomy Scale and Nurses Clinical Reasoning Scale (NCRS) were used to collect data. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis and hierarchical multiple regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Communication competence (r = 0.59) and professional autonomy (r = 0.46) showed significant positive relationships with clinical reasoning competence. Clinical experience, communication competence, age and professional autonomy were statistically significant predictors and explained 48.6% of clinical reasoning competence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical reasoning competence of oncology nurses increases proportionally with their communication competence and professional autonomy. Therefore, oncology nurses must reinforce their communication competence and professional autonomy to enhance their clinical reasoning competence.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>The reinforcement of communication competence and professional autonomy is necessary for oncology nurses to enhance their clinical reasoning competence. In order to improve nurses' communication competence, practical-focused communication education programmes must be designed and deployed systematically and periodically. In addition, to increase nurses' professional autonomy, it is necessary to expand their clinical experiences through the regular rotation of working units and to make institutional efforts to retain experienced nurses.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>We have adhered to STROBE checklist.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Participants in the study were recruited online. They were informed of the study's purpose, method and usability and the survey could only be conducted if they consented to participate voluntarily.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"11 8","pages":"e70003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11336653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationships among communication competence, professional autonomy and clinical reasoning competence in oncology nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Suyeon Noh, Younhee Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nop2.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the relationships among communication competence, professional autonomy and clinical reasoning and to identify the factors that influence clinical reasoning competence in oncology nurses.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional descriptive design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included 147 oncology nurses with more than a year of clinical experience in cancer wards. The Global Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale, Schutzenhofer Professional Autonomy Scale and Nurses Clinical Reasoning Scale (NCRS) were used to collect data. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis and hierarchical multiple regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Communication competence (r = 0.59) and professional autonomy (r = 0.46) showed significant positive relationships with clinical reasoning competence. Clinical experience, communication competence, age and professional autonomy were statistically significant predictors and explained 48.6% of clinical reasoning competence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical reasoning competence of oncology nurses increases proportionally with their communication competence and professional autonomy. Therefore, oncology nurses must reinforce their communication competence and professional autonomy to enhance their clinical reasoning competence.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>The reinforcement of communication competence and professional autonomy is necessary for oncology nurses to enhance their clinical reasoning competence. In order to improve nurses' communication competence, practical-focused communication education programmes must be designed and deployed systematically and periodically. In addition, to increase nurses' professional autonomy, it is necessary to expand their clinical experiences through the regular rotation of working units and to make institutional efforts to retain experienced nurses.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>We have adhered to STROBE checklist.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Participants in the study were recruited online. They were informed of the study's purpose, method and usability and the survey could only be conducted if they consented to participate voluntarily.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Open\",\"volume\":\"11 8\",\"pages\":\"e70003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11336653/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究沟通能力、专业自主性和临床推理能力之间的关系,并确定影响肿瘤科护士临床推理能力的因素:设计:横断面描述性设计:参与者包括 147 名在肿瘤病房工作一年以上的肿瘤科护士。采用全球人际沟通能力量表、舒岑霍夫职业自主性量表和护士临床推理量表(NCRS)收集数据。数据分析采用描述性统计、独立 t 检验、单因素方差分析、皮尔逊相关分析和分层多元回归分析:结果:沟通能力(r = 0.59)和专业自主性(r = 0.46)与临床推理能力呈显著正相关。临床经验、沟通能力、年龄和专业自主性对临床推理能力的预测具有统计学意义,并解释了临床推理能力的 48.6%:结论:肿瘤科护士的临床推理能力与其沟通能力和专业自主性成正比增长。因此,肿瘤科护士必须加强沟通能力和专业自主性,以提高临床推理能力:加强沟通能力和专业自主性是肿瘤科护士提高临床推理能力的必要条件。为了提高护士的沟通能力,必须定期系统地设计和部署以实践为重点的沟通教育计划。此外,为了提高护士的专业自主性,有必要通过工作单位的定期轮换来扩大护士的临床经验,并从制度上努力留住有经验的护士:我们遵守了 STROBE 检查表:研究参与者通过网络招募。他们被告知了研究的目的、方法和可用性,只有在他们自愿同意参与的情况下才能进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relationships among communication competence, professional autonomy and clinical reasoning competence in oncology nurses.

Aims: To investigate the relationships among communication competence, professional autonomy and clinical reasoning and to identify the factors that influence clinical reasoning competence in oncology nurses.

Design: Cross-sectional descriptive design.

Methods: Participants included 147 oncology nurses with more than a year of clinical experience in cancer wards. The Global Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale, Schutzenhofer Professional Autonomy Scale and Nurses Clinical Reasoning Scale (NCRS) were used to collect data. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis and hierarchical multiple regression analysis.

Results: Communication competence (r = 0.59) and professional autonomy (r = 0.46) showed significant positive relationships with clinical reasoning competence. Clinical experience, communication competence, age and professional autonomy were statistically significant predictors and explained 48.6% of clinical reasoning competence.

Conclusions: The clinical reasoning competence of oncology nurses increases proportionally with their communication competence and professional autonomy. Therefore, oncology nurses must reinforce their communication competence and professional autonomy to enhance their clinical reasoning competence.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: The reinforcement of communication competence and professional autonomy is necessary for oncology nurses to enhance their clinical reasoning competence. In order to improve nurses' communication competence, practical-focused communication education programmes must be designed and deployed systematically and periodically. In addition, to increase nurses' professional autonomy, it is necessary to expand their clinical experiences through the regular rotation of working units and to make institutional efforts to retain experienced nurses.

Reporting method: We have adhered to STROBE checklist.

Patient or public contribution: Participants in the study were recruited online. They were informed of the study's purpose, method and usability and the survey could only be conducted if they consented to participate voluntarily.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信