远程监控自动腹膜透析可降低死亡率、不良事件和住院率:分组随机对照试验。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 TRANSPLANTATION
Ramón Paniagua, Alfonso Ramos, Marcela Ávila, María-de-Jesús Ventura, Armando Nevarez-Sida, Abdul Rashid Qureshi, Bengt Lindholm
{"title":"远程监控自动腹膜透析可降低死亡率、不良事件和住院率:分组随机对照试验。","authors":"Ramón Paniagua, Alfonso Ramos, Marcela Ávila, María-de-Jesús Ventura, Armando Nevarez-Sida, Abdul Rashid Qureshi, Bengt Lindholm","doi":"10.1093/ndt/gfae188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Remote monitoring (RM) of patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) prevent complications and improve treatment quality. We analyzed the effect of RM-APD on mortality and complications related to cardiovascular disease (VD), fluid overload and insufficient dialysis efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cluster-randomized, open-label, controlled trial, 21 hospitals with APD programs were assigned to use either RM-APD (10 hospitals; 403 patients) or conventional APD (11 hospitals; 398 patients) for the treatment of adult patients starting PD. Primary outcomes were time to first event of: 1) Composite Index-1 comprising all-cause mortality, first adverse events and hospitalizations of any cause, and 2) Composite Index-2 comprising cardiovascular mortality, first adverse event and hospitalizations related to CVD, fluid overload and insufficient dialysis efficiency. Secondary outcomes were time to first event of individual components of the two composite indices, and rates of adverse events, hospitalizations, unplanned visits, and transfer to hemodialysis. Patients were followed for a median of 9.5 months. Primary outcomes were evaluated by competing-risk analysis and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While time to reach Composite Index-1 did not differ between the groups, Composite Index-2 was reached earlier (ΔRMST: -0.85 months; p=0.02), and all-cause mortality (55 vs. 33 deaths, p=0.01; sHR 1.69 (95%CI 1.39-2.05), p<0.001) and hospitalizations of any cause were higher in APD group than in RM-APD as were cardiovascular deaths (24 vs. 13 deaths, p=0.05; sHR 2.44 (95%CI 1.72 - 3.45), p<0.001) and rates of adverse events and hospitalizations related to CVD, fluid overload or insufficient dialysis efficiency. Dropouts were more common in the APD group (131 vs. 110, p=0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This randomized controlled trial shows that remote monitoring may add significant advantages to APD, including improved survival and reduced rate of adverse events and hospitalizations, which can favorably impact the acceptance and adoption of the therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19078,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote monitoring of automated peritoneal dialysis reduces mortality, adverse events, and hospitalizations: a cluster randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ramón Paniagua, Alfonso Ramos, Marcela Ávila, María-de-Jesús Ventura, Armando Nevarez-Sida, Abdul Rashid Qureshi, Bengt Lindholm\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ndt/gfae188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and hypothesis: </strong>Remote monitoring (RM) of patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) prevent complications and improve treatment quality. We analyzed the effect of RM-APD on mortality and complications related to cardiovascular disease (VD), fluid overload and insufficient dialysis efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a cluster-randomized, open-label, controlled trial, 21 hospitals with APD programs were assigned to use either RM-APD (10 hospitals; 403 patients) or conventional APD (11 hospitals; 398 patients) for the treatment of adult patients starting PD. Primary outcomes were time to first event of: 1) Composite Index-1 comprising all-cause mortality, first adverse events and hospitalizations of any cause, and 2) Composite Index-2 comprising cardiovascular mortality, first adverse event and hospitalizations related to CVD, fluid overload and insufficient dialysis efficiency. Secondary outcomes were time to first event of individual components of the two composite indices, and rates of adverse events, hospitalizations, unplanned visits, and transfer to hemodialysis. Patients were followed for a median of 9.5 months. Primary outcomes were evaluated by competing-risk analysis and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While time to reach Composite Index-1 did not differ between the groups, Composite Index-2 was reached earlier (ΔRMST: -0.85 months; p=0.02), and all-cause mortality (55 vs. 33 deaths, p=0.01; sHR 1.69 (95%CI 1.39-2.05), p<0.001) and hospitalizations of any cause were higher in APD group than in RM-APD as were cardiovascular deaths (24 vs. 13 deaths, p=0.05; sHR 2.44 (95%CI 1.72 - 3.45), p<0.001) and rates of adverse events and hospitalizations related to CVD, fluid overload or insufficient dialysis efficiency. Dropouts were more common in the APD group (131 vs. 110, p=0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This randomized controlled trial shows that remote monitoring may add significant advantages to APD, including improved survival and reduced rate of adverse events and hospitalizations, which can favorably impact the acceptance and adoption of the therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfae188\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfae188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和假设:对自动腹膜透析(APD)患者进行远程监测(RM)可预防并发症并提高治疗质量。我们分析了RM-APD对死亡率以及与心血管疾病(VD)、液体超负荷和透析效率不足有关的并发症的影响:在一项分组随机、开放标签、对照试验中,21 家拥有 APD 项目的医院被分配使用 RM-APD(10 家医院;403 名患者)或传统 APD(11 家医院;398 名患者)治疗开始透析的成年患者。主要研究结果是下列指标首次出现的时间1)综合指数-1,包括全因死亡率、首次不良事件和任何原因的住院治疗;2)综合指数-2,包括心血管死亡率、首次不良事件以及与心血管疾病、体液超负荷和透析效率不足有关的住院治疗。次要结果包括:两个综合指数的各个组成部分发生首次事件的时间、不良事件发生率、住院率、计划外就诊率和转入血液透析率。对患者的随访时间中位数为 9.5 个月。主要结果通过竞争风险分析和限制性平均生存时间(RMST)分析进行评估:结果:虽然两组患者达到综合指数-1的时间没有差异,但达到综合指数-2的时间更早(ΔRMST:-0.85个月;p=0.02),全因死亡率(55例死亡 vs. 33例死亡,p=0.01;sHR 1.69(95%CI 1.39-2.05),p结论:这项随机对照试验表明,远程监测可为 APD 带来显著优势,包括提高存活率、降低不良事件和住院率,这将对该疗法的接受和采用产生有利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remote monitoring of automated peritoneal dialysis reduces mortality, adverse events, and hospitalizations: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Background and hypothesis: Remote monitoring (RM) of patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) prevent complications and improve treatment quality. We analyzed the effect of RM-APD on mortality and complications related to cardiovascular disease (VD), fluid overload and insufficient dialysis efficiency.

Methods: In a cluster-randomized, open-label, controlled trial, 21 hospitals with APD programs were assigned to use either RM-APD (10 hospitals; 403 patients) or conventional APD (11 hospitals; 398 patients) for the treatment of adult patients starting PD. Primary outcomes were time to first event of: 1) Composite Index-1 comprising all-cause mortality, first adverse events and hospitalizations of any cause, and 2) Composite Index-2 comprising cardiovascular mortality, first adverse event and hospitalizations related to CVD, fluid overload and insufficient dialysis efficiency. Secondary outcomes were time to first event of individual components of the two composite indices, and rates of adverse events, hospitalizations, unplanned visits, and transfer to hemodialysis. Patients were followed for a median of 9.5 months. Primary outcomes were evaluated by competing-risk analysis and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis.

Results: While time to reach Composite Index-1 did not differ between the groups, Composite Index-2 was reached earlier (ΔRMST: -0.85 months; p=0.02), and all-cause mortality (55 vs. 33 deaths, p=0.01; sHR 1.69 (95%CI 1.39-2.05), p<0.001) and hospitalizations of any cause were higher in APD group than in RM-APD as were cardiovascular deaths (24 vs. 13 deaths, p=0.05; sHR 2.44 (95%CI 1.72 - 3.45), p<0.001) and rates of adverse events and hospitalizations related to CVD, fluid overload or insufficient dialysis efficiency. Dropouts were more common in the APD group (131 vs. 110, p=0.048).

Conclusions: This randomized controlled trial shows that remote monitoring may add significant advantages to APD, including improved survival and reduced rate of adverse events and hospitalizations, which can favorably impact the acceptance and adoption of the therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1431
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (ndt) is the leading nephrology journal in Europe and renowned worldwide, devoted to original clinical and laboratory research in nephrology, dialysis and transplantation. ndt is an official journal of the [ERA-EDTA](http://www.era-edta.org/) (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association). Published monthly, the journal provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians throughout the world. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review. Print ISSN: 0931-0509.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信