对美国卫生系统药剂师协会认可的研究生一年级药学住院医师项目的研究经验进行特征描述和比较的全国性调查。

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1177/08971900241273223
Andrea Dressler, Robert W Seabury, William Darko, Wesley D Kufel, Jeffrey M Steele, Courtney Kelly, Ryan Andrew, Zachary Hayes, Christopher D Miller, Katie A Parsels
{"title":"对美国卫生系统药剂师协会认可的研究生一年级药学住院医师项目的研究经验进行特征描述和比较的全国性调查。","authors":"Andrea Dressler, Robert W Seabury, William Darko, Wesley D Kufel, Jeffrey M Steele, Courtney Kelly, Ryan Andrew, Zachary Hayes, Christopher D Miller, Katie A Parsels","doi":"10.1177/08971900241273223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Many Postgraduate Year One (PGY1) Pharmacy residencies provide research training however, details of this training are not well described. Publication rates have been utilized to assess residency research learning experiences. Higher publication rates have been reported by programs that have implemented a structured research learning experience. <b>Objective:</b> The primary objective was to identify differences in the research learning experiences for American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) accredited PGY1 Pharmacy residencies with reported resident publication rates of ≥20% vs <20%. <b>Methods:</b> This survey was distributed to PGY1 Pharmacy residency program directors (RPDs). Seven sections were analyzed to identify research learning experience differences between programs with reported publication rates of ≥20% vs <20%: (1) program characteristics/research outcomes; (2) involved individuals; (3) requirements; (4) learning experience structure; (5) educational methods; (6) formal education; (7) barriers/RPD perceptions. Variables with <i>P</i> < 0.05 on logistic regression were considered statistically significant. <b>Results:</b> The survey response rate was 31.3% (308/984). Significant positive predictors for reported publication rates of ≥20% were: involved individuals: research director/coordinator, individuals trained in statistics, non-pharmacy medical staff; requirements: Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative training, research seminars/training courses, research manuscript; learning experience structure: research committee; educational methods: didactic residency-led lectures/courses, formal workshops, self-taught online modules; and formal education: manuscript preparation. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study suggests there are differences in the research learning experiences at PGY1 Pharmacy residencies with reported resident publications rates of ≥20% vs <20%. We encourage PGY1 Pharmacy residency programs to consider implementing elements associated with reported resident publication rates of ≥20%.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"128-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationwide Survey to Characterize and Compare the Research Experiences of American Society of Health-System Pharmacists-Accredited Postgraduate Year One Pharmacy Residency Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Dressler, Robert W Seabury, William Darko, Wesley D Kufel, Jeffrey M Steele, Courtney Kelly, Ryan Andrew, Zachary Hayes, Christopher D Miller, Katie A Parsels\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08971900241273223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Many Postgraduate Year One (PGY1) Pharmacy residencies provide research training however, details of this training are not well described. Publication rates have been utilized to assess residency research learning experiences. Higher publication rates have been reported by programs that have implemented a structured research learning experience. <b>Objective:</b> The primary objective was to identify differences in the research learning experiences for American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) accredited PGY1 Pharmacy residencies with reported resident publication rates of ≥20% vs <20%. <b>Methods:</b> This survey was distributed to PGY1 Pharmacy residency program directors (RPDs). Seven sections were analyzed to identify research learning experience differences between programs with reported publication rates of ≥20% vs <20%: (1) program characteristics/research outcomes; (2) involved individuals; (3) requirements; (4) learning experience structure; (5) educational methods; (6) formal education; (7) barriers/RPD perceptions. Variables with <i>P</i> < 0.05 on logistic regression were considered statistically significant. <b>Results:</b> The survey response rate was 31.3% (308/984). Significant positive predictors for reported publication rates of ≥20% were: involved individuals: research director/coordinator, individuals trained in statistics, non-pharmacy medical staff; requirements: Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative training, research seminars/training courses, research manuscript; learning experience structure: research committee; educational methods: didactic residency-led lectures/courses, formal workshops, self-taught online modules; and formal education: manuscript preparation. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study suggests there are differences in the research learning experiences at PGY1 Pharmacy residencies with reported resident publications rates of ≥20% vs <20%. We encourage PGY1 Pharmacy residency programs to consider implementing elements associated with reported resident publication rates of ≥20%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"128-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241273223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241273223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多研究生一年级(PGY1)的药剂学住院医师都提供研究培训,但这种培训的细节却没有得到很好的描述。发表论文率被用来评估住院医师研究学习经验。据报道,实施了结构化研究学习经验的项目发表论文的比率较高。目标:主要目的是确定美国卫生系统药剂师协会(ASHP)认证的 PGY1 级药学住院医师在研究学习经验方面的差异,这些住院医师的论文发表率≥20%:该调查问卷分发给 PGY1 级药学住院医师培训项目主任 (RPD)。对七个部分进行了分析,以确定报告发表率≥20%的项目与报告发表率≥20%的项目之间在研究学习经验方面的差异。结果调查回复率为 31.3%(308/984)。报告发表率≥20%的显著正向预测因素是:参与人员:研究主任/协调员、接受过统计培训的人员、非药剂科医务人员;要求:合作机构培训计划培训、研究研讨会/培训课程、研究手稿;学习经验结构:研究委员会;教育方法:住院医师授课讲座/课程、正式研讨会、自学在线模块;正式教育:手稿准备。结论本研究表明,PGY1 级药剂学住院医师的研究学习经验存在差异,住院医师发表论文率≥20% 与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nationwide Survey to Characterize and Compare the Research Experiences of American Society of Health-System Pharmacists-Accredited Postgraduate Year One Pharmacy Residency Programs.

Background: Many Postgraduate Year One (PGY1) Pharmacy residencies provide research training however, details of this training are not well described. Publication rates have been utilized to assess residency research learning experiences. Higher publication rates have been reported by programs that have implemented a structured research learning experience. Objective: The primary objective was to identify differences in the research learning experiences for American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) accredited PGY1 Pharmacy residencies with reported resident publication rates of ≥20% vs <20%. Methods: This survey was distributed to PGY1 Pharmacy residency program directors (RPDs). Seven sections were analyzed to identify research learning experience differences between programs with reported publication rates of ≥20% vs <20%: (1) program characteristics/research outcomes; (2) involved individuals; (3) requirements; (4) learning experience structure; (5) educational methods; (6) formal education; (7) barriers/RPD perceptions. Variables with P < 0.05 on logistic regression were considered statistically significant. Results: The survey response rate was 31.3% (308/984). Significant positive predictors for reported publication rates of ≥20% were: involved individuals: research director/coordinator, individuals trained in statistics, non-pharmacy medical staff; requirements: Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative training, research seminars/training courses, research manuscript; learning experience structure: research committee; educational methods: didactic residency-led lectures/courses, formal workshops, self-taught online modules; and formal education: manuscript preparation. Conclusion: This study suggests there are differences in the research learning experiences at PGY1 Pharmacy residencies with reported resident publications rates of ≥20% vs <20%. We encourage PGY1 Pharmacy residency programs to consider implementing elements associated with reported resident publication rates of ≥20%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信