非老年人经静脉拔除导联的结果:单中心回顾性研究

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1111/pace.15062
Toshinori Komatsu, Ayako Okada, Morio Shoda, Kiu Tanaka, Hideki Kobayashi, Yasutaka Oguchi, Tatsuya Saigusa, Soichiro Ebisawa, Hirohiko Motoki, Koichiro Kuwahara
{"title":"非老年人经静脉拔除导联的结果:单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Toshinori Komatsu, Ayako Okada, Morio Shoda, Kiu Tanaka, Hideki Kobayashi, Yasutaka Oguchi, Tatsuya Saigusa, Soichiro Ebisawa, Hirohiko Motoki, Koichiro Kuwahara","doi":"10.1111/pace.15062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infections has increased. The incidence of TLE in nonagenarians is low, with limited reports outlining the outcomes of this procedure. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the outcomes of TLE in nonagenarians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with TLE treated at our hospital between 2014 and 2023 were retrospectively examined; patient characteristics, device type, indications, procedures, complications, and clinical data of nonagenarians were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 12 patients with 24 leads (active fixation lead, n = 11; passive fixation lead, n = 13) who underwent TLE, the indication for TLE was infection (pocket infection, n = 8; sepsis, n = 4). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most frequently identified causative agent (n = 4). The median patient age was 91 years; five patients were female. The median lead dwell time was 9 years. Excimer laser sheath (16 leads), mechanical sheath (five leads), Evolution RL (one lead), and manual traction (two leads) were employed in TLE. The procedure was successful in all patients, and only one had a minor complication. Six patients required CIED re-implantation, and leadless pacemakers were selected for five patients. The 30-day mortality after TLE was 0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TLE can be safely performed in nonagenarians. The decision to perform TLE should not be based on old age alone; the suitability of removing infected CIEDs should be determined based on each patient's condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of transvenous lead extraction in nonagenarians: A single-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Toshinori Komatsu, Ayako Okada, Morio Shoda, Kiu Tanaka, Hideki Kobayashi, Yasutaka Oguchi, Tatsuya Saigusa, Soichiro Ebisawa, Hirohiko Motoki, Koichiro Kuwahara\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.15062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infections has increased. The incidence of TLE in nonagenarians is low, with limited reports outlining the outcomes of this procedure. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the outcomes of TLE in nonagenarians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with TLE treated at our hospital between 2014 and 2023 were retrospectively examined; patient characteristics, device type, indications, procedures, complications, and clinical data of nonagenarians were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 12 patients with 24 leads (active fixation lead, n = 11; passive fixation lead, n = 13) who underwent TLE, the indication for TLE was infection (pocket infection, n = 8; sepsis, n = 4). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most frequently identified causative agent (n = 4). The median patient age was 91 years; five patients were female. The median lead dwell time was 9 years. Excimer laser sheath (16 leads), mechanical sheath (five leads), Evolution RL (one lead), and manual traction (two leads) were employed in TLE. The procedure was successful in all patients, and only one had a minor complication. Six patients required CIED re-implantation, and leadless pacemakers were selected for five patients. The 30-day mortality after TLE was 0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TLE can be safely performed in nonagenarians. The decision to perform TLE should not be based on old age alone; the suitability of removing infected CIEDs should be determined based on each patient's condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15062\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:用于治疗心血管植入式电子设备(CIED)相关感染的经静脉导联取出术(TLE)越来越多。经静脉导联抽出术在非老年人中的发病率很低,有关该手术结果的报道也很有限。因此,在这项研究中,我们旨在明确非老年人TLE的治疗效果:方法:回顾性研究2014年至2023年间在我院接受治疗的TLE患者,分析非老年人的患者特征、设备类型、适应症、手术过程、并发症和临床数据:在接受TLE的12例24导联患者(主动固定导联,11例;被动固定导联,13例)中,TLE的适应症为感染(袋感染,8例;败血症,4例)。耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌是最常见的致病菌(4 例)。患者年龄中位数为 91 岁,其中 5 人为女性。导联停留时间中位数为 9 年。TLE 采用了准分子激光鞘(16 条导联)、机械鞘(5 条导联)、Evolution RL(1 条导联)和手动牵引(2 条导联)。所有患者的手术都很成功,只有一名患者出现了轻微并发症。六名患者需要重新植入 CIED,五名患者选择了无导联起搏器。TLE术后30天的死亡率为0%:结论:TLE可以安全地在非老年人中实施。不应仅根据年龄来决定是否进行TLE;应根据每位患者的情况来决定是否适合移除受感染的CIED。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of transvenous lead extraction in nonagenarians: A single-center retrospective study.

Background: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infections has increased. The incidence of TLE in nonagenarians is low, with limited reports outlining the outcomes of this procedure. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to clarify the outcomes of TLE in nonagenarians.

Methods: Patients with TLE treated at our hospital between 2014 and 2023 were retrospectively examined; patient characteristics, device type, indications, procedures, complications, and clinical data of nonagenarians were analyzed.

Results: Of 12 patients with 24 leads (active fixation lead, n = 11; passive fixation lead, n = 13) who underwent TLE, the indication for TLE was infection (pocket infection, n = 8; sepsis, n = 4). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most frequently identified causative agent (n = 4). The median patient age was 91 years; five patients were female. The median lead dwell time was 9 years. Excimer laser sheath (16 leads), mechanical sheath (five leads), Evolution RL (one lead), and manual traction (two leads) were employed in TLE. The procedure was successful in all patients, and only one had a minor complication. Six patients required CIED re-implantation, and leadless pacemakers were selected for five patients. The 30-day mortality after TLE was 0%.

Conclusion: TLE can be safely performed in nonagenarians. The decision to perform TLE should not be based on old age alone; the suitability of removing infected CIEDs should be determined based on each patient's condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
209
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE) is the foremost peer-reviewed journal in the field of pacing and implantable cardioversion defibrillation, publishing over 50% of all English language articles in its field, featuring original, review, and didactic papers, and case reports related to daily practice. Articles also include editorials, book reviews, Musings on humane topics relevant to medical practice, electrophysiology (EP) rounds, device rounds, and information concerning the quality of devices used in the practice of the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信