荷兰全科医生镇痛处方的变化。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1080/02813432.2024.2387423
D Veldkamp, N Pooters, H J Schers, R Akkermans, T C Olde Hartman, A A Uijen
{"title":"荷兰全科医生镇痛处方的变化。","authors":"D Veldkamp, N Pooters, H J Schers, R Akkermans, T C Olde Hartman, A A Uijen","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2387423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increases in opioid prescriptions have been described; however, recent trends and prescribing patterns of analgesics in Dutch general practice are largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate recent changes in the number of analgesic prescriptions, and the indications for prescribing strong opioids. Furthermore, we aim to identify risk factors for chronic opioid use in Dutch general practice.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A retrospective cohort study from 1 July 2013 to 31 June 2022, using a primary care practice based research network.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Patients with ≥1 prescription for analgesics during the study period were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Changes in the number of prescriptions for paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids in Dutch general practice during the 9-year study period. Moreover, we analyzed indications for prescribing strong opioids by the general practitioner (GP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18,433 analgesic users were identified. Over time, prescriptions for paracetamol, NSAIDs and weak opioids decreased, while the number of strong opioid prescriptions increased. General practitioners prescribed more strong opioids for non-malignant pain, whereas prescriptions for malignant pain remained stable over time. Risk factors for chronic opioid use (≥90 days) included older age, lower educational level, smoking status and having a history of a musculoskeletal or psychological disorder, a malignancy or sexual, physical or psychological abuse.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the increase in strong opioid prescriptions for benign conditions, GPs need to be vigilant for patients who are at risk for chronic use. Regular monitoring and awareness for psychosocial factors in treatment of chronic pain may be key in preventing harms associated with persistent opioid use.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in analgesic prescriptions in Dutch general practice.\",\"authors\":\"D Veldkamp, N Pooters, H J Schers, R Akkermans, T C Olde Hartman, A A Uijen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02813432.2024.2387423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increases in opioid prescriptions have been described; however, recent trends and prescribing patterns of analgesics in Dutch general practice are largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate recent changes in the number of analgesic prescriptions, and the indications for prescribing strong opioids. Furthermore, we aim to identify risk factors for chronic opioid use in Dutch general practice.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A retrospective cohort study from 1 July 2013 to 31 June 2022, using a primary care practice based research network.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Patients with ≥1 prescription for analgesics during the study period were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Changes in the number of prescriptions for paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids in Dutch general practice during the 9-year study period. Moreover, we analyzed indications for prescribing strong opioids by the general practitioner (GP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18,433 analgesic users were identified. Over time, prescriptions for paracetamol, NSAIDs and weak opioids decreased, while the number of strong opioid prescriptions increased. General practitioners prescribed more strong opioids for non-malignant pain, whereas prescriptions for malignant pain remained stable over time. Risk factors for chronic opioid use (≥90 days) included older age, lower educational level, smoking status and having a history of a musculoskeletal or psychological disorder, a malignancy or sexual, physical or psychological abuse.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the increase in strong opioid prescriptions for benign conditions, GPs need to be vigilant for patients who are at risk for chronic use. Regular monitoring and awareness for psychosocial factors in treatment of chronic pain may be key in preventing harms associated with persistent opioid use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552297/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2387423\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2387423","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据报道,阿片类药物处方量有所增加,但荷兰全科医生镇痛药的最新趋势和处方模式却不为人知:阿片类药物处方量的增加已有所描述;然而,荷兰全科医生镇痛药的最新趋势和处方模式在很大程度上还不为人所知:调查近期镇痛剂处方数量的变化以及开具强效阿片类药物处方的适应症。此外,我们还旨在确定荷兰全科医生长期使用阿片类药物的风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究,研究时间为 2013 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 31 日,研究对象为基于初级保健实践的研究网络:主要结果指标:主要结果指标:9 年研究期间荷兰全科医生开出的扑热息痛、非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和阿片类药物处方数量的变化。此外,我们还分析了全科医生(GP)开具强效阿片类药物处方的适应症:结果:共确定了 18,433 名镇痛药使用者。随着时间的推移,扑热息痛、非甾体抗炎药和弱阿片类药物的处方数量有所减少,而强阿片类药物的处方数量有所增加。全科医生为非恶性疼痛开出了更多的强效阿片类药物处方,而恶性疼痛的处方则随着时间的推移保持稳定。长期使用阿片类药物(≥90 天)的风险因素包括年龄较大、教育程度较低、吸烟、有肌肉骨骼或心理疾病、恶性肿瘤或性虐待、身体虐待或心理虐待史:考虑到因良性疾病而开具大量阿片类药物处方的情况有所增加,全科医生需要对有长期使用风险的患者保持警惕。在治疗慢性疼痛的过程中,定期监测和认识社会心理因素可能是预防持续使用阿片类药物相关危害的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in analgesic prescriptions in Dutch general practice.

Background: Increases in opioid prescriptions have been described; however, recent trends and prescribing patterns of analgesics in Dutch general practice are largely unknown.

Objective: To investigate recent changes in the number of analgesic prescriptions, and the indications for prescribing strong opioids. Furthermore, we aim to identify risk factors for chronic opioid use in Dutch general practice.

Design and setting: A retrospective cohort study from 1 July 2013 to 31 June 2022, using a primary care practice based research network.

Subjects: Patients with ≥1 prescription for analgesics during the study period were included.

Main outcome measure: Changes in the number of prescriptions for paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids in Dutch general practice during the 9-year study period. Moreover, we analyzed indications for prescribing strong opioids by the general practitioner (GP).

Results: A total of 18,433 analgesic users were identified. Over time, prescriptions for paracetamol, NSAIDs and weak opioids decreased, while the number of strong opioid prescriptions increased. General practitioners prescribed more strong opioids for non-malignant pain, whereas prescriptions for malignant pain remained stable over time. Risk factors for chronic opioid use (≥90 days) included older age, lower educational level, smoking status and having a history of a musculoskeletal or psychological disorder, a malignancy or sexual, physical or psychological abuse.

Conclusions: Considering the increase in strong opioid prescriptions for benign conditions, GPs need to be vigilant for patients who are at risk for chronic use. Regular monitoring and awareness for psychosocial factors in treatment of chronic pain may be key in preventing harms associated with persistent opioid use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信