使用电子医疗数据进行信号检测时基于树状扫描统计的实际应用考虑因素:胰岛素格列卫案例研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2393274
Lockwood G Taylor, Marie-Laure Kürzinger, Ruben Hermans, Shirin Enshaeifar, Bernadette Dwan, Priyanka Chhikara, Xinyu Li, Sreenivas Thummisetti, Sandrine Colas, Marielle Duverne, Juhaeri Juhaeri
{"title":"使用电子医疗数据进行信号检测时基于树状扫描统计的实际应用考虑因素:胰岛素格列卫案例研究。","authors":"Lockwood G Taylor, Marie-Laure Kürzinger, Ruben Hermans, Shirin Enshaeifar, Bernadette Dwan, Priyanka Chhikara, Xinyu Li, Sreenivas Thummisetti, Sandrine Colas, Marielle Duverne, Juhaeri Juhaeri","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2393274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypothesis-free signal detection (HFSD) methods such as tree-based scan statistics (TBSS) applied to longitudinal electronic healthcare data (EHD) are increasingly used in safety monitoring. However, challenges may arise in interpreting HFSD results alongside results from disproportionality analysis of spontaneous reporting.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using the anti-diabetes drug insulin glargine (Lantus®) we apply two different tree-based scan designs using TreeScan™ software on retrospective EHD and compare the results to one another as well as to results from a disproportionality analysis using SRD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The self-controlled tree temporal scan method produced the larger number of alerts relative to propensity-score matched approach; however, far fewer alerts were observed when analyses were limited to EHD in inpatient/emergency room settings only. Very few reference adverse events were observed using TBSS methods on EHD relative to disproportionality methods in SRD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in detected alerts between TBSS methods and between TBSS and disproportionality analysis of SRD are likely attributable to differences in data, comparator, and study design. Our results suggest that HFDS methods like TBSS applied to EHD may complement more traditional approaches such as disproportionality analysis of SRD to provide a more complete picture of product safety in the post-approval setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1131-1141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations for practical use of tree-based scan statistics for signal detection using electronic healthcare data: a case study with insulin glargine.\",\"authors\":\"Lockwood G Taylor, Marie-Laure Kürzinger, Ruben Hermans, Shirin Enshaeifar, Bernadette Dwan, Priyanka Chhikara, Xinyu Li, Sreenivas Thummisetti, Sandrine Colas, Marielle Duverne, Juhaeri Juhaeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2393274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypothesis-free signal detection (HFSD) methods such as tree-based scan statistics (TBSS) applied to longitudinal electronic healthcare data (EHD) are increasingly used in safety monitoring. However, challenges may arise in interpreting HFSD results alongside results from disproportionality analysis of spontaneous reporting.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using the anti-diabetes drug insulin glargine (Lantus®) we apply two different tree-based scan designs using TreeScan™ software on retrospective EHD and compare the results to one another as well as to results from a disproportionality analysis using SRD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The self-controlled tree temporal scan method produced the larger number of alerts relative to propensity-score matched approach; however, far fewer alerts were observed when analyses were limited to EHD in inpatient/emergency room settings only. Very few reference adverse events were observed using TBSS methods on EHD relative to disproportionality methods in SRD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in detected alerts between TBSS methods and between TBSS and disproportionality analysis of SRD are likely attributable to differences in data, comparator, and study design. Our results suggest that HFDS methods like TBSS applied to EHD may complement more traditional approaches such as disproportionality analysis of SRD to provide a more complete picture of product safety in the post-approval setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1131-1141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2393274\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2393274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:应用于纵向电子医疗数据(EHD)的无假设信号检测(HFSD)方法,如基于树的扫描统计(TBSS),正越来越多地应用于安全监测中。然而,在解释 HFSD 结果和自发报告的不相称性分析结果时可能会遇到挑战:我们使用 TreeScan™ 软件对回顾性 EHD 进行了两种不同的树形扫描设计,并将结果与 SRD 的不相称性分析结果进行了比较:与倾向分数匹配法相比,自控树状时间扫描法产生的警报数量较多;但当分析仅限于住院/急诊室环境中的 EHD 时,观察到的警报数量要少得多。与 SRD 中的比例失调方法相比,在 EHD 中使用 TBSS 方法观察到的参考不良事件极少:结论:TBSS 方法之间以及 SRD 的 TBSS 和比例失调分析之间在检测到的警报方面的差异可能是由于数据、比较对象和研究设计方面的差异造成的。我们的研究结果表明,将 TBSS 等 HFDS 方法应用于 EHD 可以补充 SRD 比例失调分析等更传统的方法,从而更全面地反映产品批准后的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Considerations for practical use of tree-based scan statistics for signal detection using electronic healthcare data: a case study with insulin glargine.

Background: Hypothesis-free signal detection (HFSD) methods such as tree-based scan statistics (TBSS) applied to longitudinal electronic healthcare data (EHD) are increasingly used in safety monitoring. However, challenges may arise in interpreting HFSD results alongside results from disproportionality analysis of spontaneous reporting.

Research design and methods: Using the anti-diabetes drug insulin glargine (Lantus®) we apply two different tree-based scan designs using TreeScan™ software on retrospective EHD and compare the results to one another as well as to results from a disproportionality analysis using SRD.

Results: The self-controlled tree temporal scan method produced the larger number of alerts relative to propensity-score matched approach; however, far fewer alerts were observed when analyses were limited to EHD in inpatient/emergency room settings only. Very few reference adverse events were observed using TBSS methods on EHD relative to disproportionality methods in SRD.

Conclusion: Differences in detected alerts between TBSS methods and between TBSS and disproportionality analysis of SRD are likely attributable to differences in data, comparator, and study design. Our results suggest that HFDS methods like TBSS applied to EHD may complement more traditional approaches such as disproportionality analysis of SRD to provide a more complete picture of product safety in the post-approval setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信