Jianfeng Wu , Dongfang Jiao , Yuting Cai , Songyang Guo , Yuyun Chen , Chengmin Li , Hongchun Yang
{"title":"个性化社交阅读:文本标记和字体大小对阅读体验的影响","authors":"Jianfeng Wu , Dongfang Jiao , Yuting Cai , Songyang Guo , Yuyun Chen , Chengmin Li , Hongchun Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated how text markers (TMs) and font size (FS) affect the reading experience. College students (N = 45) read textual material presented in four TM formats (underline, highlight, margin note at right, and margin note at end) and three FSs (8 pt, 12 pt, and 14 pt). Their reading experience (immersion, social presence, and satisfaction) was assessed through subjective postreading ratings and interpreted through eye-tracking data. The results showed that different forms of TM affected the reading experience. Effects of TMs on immersion, social presence, and satisfaction were identified, along with interaction effects between TM and FS on immersion, first fixation duration, and total fixation duration ratio. Specifically, reading experience at smaller FSs (8 pt) was more likely to be influenced by TMs. Regarding eye-tracking metrics, first fixation duration was positively correlated with immersion, and total fixation duration ratio was negatively correlated with immersion. Although no correlation was found between immersion and social presence, a negative correlation was found in the actual reading process (i.e., the stronger the perception of the social presence of TMs, the lower the immersion). These findings can provide insights useful for the design of TMs in social reading from a user-experience perspective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized social reading: The effect of text markers and font size on the reading experience\",\"authors\":\"Jianfeng Wu , Dongfang Jiao , Yuting Cai , Songyang Guo , Yuyun Chen , Chengmin Li , Hongchun Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigated how text markers (TMs) and font size (FS) affect the reading experience. College students (N = 45) read textual material presented in four TM formats (underline, highlight, margin note at right, and margin note at end) and three FSs (8 pt, 12 pt, and 14 pt). Their reading experience (immersion, social presence, and satisfaction) was assessed through subjective postreading ratings and interpreted through eye-tracking data. The results showed that different forms of TM affected the reading experience. Effects of TMs on immersion, social presence, and satisfaction were identified, along with interaction effects between TM and FS on immersion, first fixation duration, and total fixation duration ratio. Specifically, reading experience at smaller FSs (8 pt) was more likely to be influenced by TMs. Regarding eye-tracking metrics, first fixation duration was positively correlated with immersion, and total fixation duration ratio was negatively correlated with immersion. Although no correlation was found between immersion and social presence, a negative correlation was found in the actual reading process (i.e., the stronger the perception of the social presence of TMs, the lower the immersion). These findings can provide insights useful for the design of TMs in social reading from a user-experience perspective.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000829\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000829","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Personalized social reading: The effect of text markers and font size on the reading experience
This study investigated how text markers (TMs) and font size (FS) affect the reading experience. College students (N = 45) read textual material presented in four TM formats (underline, highlight, margin note at right, and margin note at end) and three FSs (8 pt, 12 pt, and 14 pt). Their reading experience (immersion, social presence, and satisfaction) was assessed through subjective postreading ratings and interpreted through eye-tracking data. The results showed that different forms of TM affected the reading experience. Effects of TMs on immersion, social presence, and satisfaction were identified, along with interaction effects between TM and FS on immersion, first fixation duration, and total fixation duration ratio. Specifically, reading experience at smaller FSs (8 pt) was more likely to be influenced by TMs. Regarding eye-tracking metrics, first fixation duration was positively correlated with immersion, and total fixation duration ratio was negatively correlated with immersion. Although no correlation was found between immersion and social presence, a negative correlation was found in the actual reading process (i.e., the stronger the perception of the social presence of TMs, the lower the immersion). These findings can provide insights useful for the design of TMs in social reading from a user-experience perspective.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.