个性化社交阅读:文本标记和字体大小对阅读体验的影响

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Jianfeng Wu , Dongfang Jiao , Yuting Cai , Songyang Guo , Yuyun Chen , Chengmin Li , Hongchun Yang
{"title":"个性化社交阅读:文本标记和字体大小对阅读体验的影响","authors":"Jianfeng Wu ,&nbsp;Dongfang Jiao ,&nbsp;Yuting Cai ,&nbsp;Songyang Guo ,&nbsp;Yuyun Chen ,&nbsp;Chengmin Li ,&nbsp;Hongchun Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated how text markers (TMs) and font size (FS) affect the reading experience. College students (N = 45) read textual material presented in four TM formats (underline, highlight, margin note at right, and margin note at end) and three FSs (8 pt, 12 pt, and 14 pt). Their reading experience (immersion, social presence, and satisfaction) was assessed through subjective postreading ratings and interpreted through eye-tracking data. The results showed that different forms of TM affected the reading experience. Effects of TMs on immersion, social presence, and satisfaction were identified, along with interaction effects between TM and FS on immersion, first fixation duration, and total fixation duration ratio. Specifically, reading experience at smaller FSs (8 pt) was more likely to be influenced by TMs. Regarding eye-tracking metrics, first fixation duration was positively correlated with immersion, and total fixation duration ratio was negatively correlated with immersion. Although no correlation was found between immersion and social presence, a negative correlation was found in the actual reading process (i.e., the stronger the perception of the social presence of TMs, the lower the immersion). These findings can provide insights useful for the design of TMs in social reading from a user-experience perspective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized social reading: The effect of text markers and font size on the reading experience\",\"authors\":\"Jianfeng Wu ,&nbsp;Dongfang Jiao ,&nbsp;Yuting Cai ,&nbsp;Songyang Guo ,&nbsp;Yuyun Chen ,&nbsp;Chengmin Li ,&nbsp;Hongchun Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigated how text markers (TMs) and font size (FS) affect the reading experience. College students (N = 45) read textual material presented in four TM formats (underline, highlight, margin note at right, and margin note at end) and three FSs (8 pt, 12 pt, and 14 pt). Their reading experience (immersion, social presence, and satisfaction) was assessed through subjective postreading ratings and interpreted through eye-tracking data. The results showed that different forms of TM affected the reading experience. Effects of TMs on immersion, social presence, and satisfaction were identified, along with interaction effects between TM and FS on immersion, first fixation duration, and total fixation duration ratio. Specifically, reading experience at smaller FSs (8 pt) was more likely to be influenced by TMs. Regarding eye-tracking metrics, first fixation duration was positively correlated with immersion, and total fixation duration ratio was negatively correlated with immersion. Although no correlation was found between immersion and social presence, a negative correlation was found in the actual reading process (i.e., the stronger the perception of the social presence of TMs, the lower the immersion). These findings can provide insights useful for the design of TMs in social reading from a user-experience perspective.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000829\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000829","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了文字标记(TM)和字体大小(FS)如何影响阅读体验。大学生(45 人)阅读了以四种 TM 格式(下划线、高亮、右侧边注和末尾边注)和三种 FS(8 pt、12 pt 和 14 pt)呈现的文本材料。他们的阅读体验(沉浸感、社会存在感和满意度)通过阅读后的主观评分进行评估,并通过眼动跟踪数据进行解释。结果表明,不同形式的 TM 会影响阅读体验。研究发现了TM对沉浸感、社会存在感和满意度的影响,以及TM和FS对沉浸感、首次定格持续时间和总定格持续时间比率的交互影响。具体来说,在较小的 FS(8 pt)上的阅读体验更容易受到 TM 的影响。在眼动跟踪指标方面,首次定影持续时间与沉浸度呈正相关,总定影持续时间比与沉浸度呈负相关。虽然沉浸感与社会存在之间没有相关性,但在实际阅读过程中却发现了负相关(即对 TM 的社会存在感越强,沉浸感越低)。这些发现可以从用户体验的角度为社交阅读中的文字媒体设计提供有益的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personalized social reading: The effect of text markers and font size on the reading experience

This study investigated how text markers (TMs) and font size (FS) affect the reading experience. College students (N = 45) read textual material presented in four TM formats (underline, highlight, margin note at right, and margin note at end) and three FSs (8 pt, 12 pt, and 14 pt). Their reading experience (immersion, social presence, and satisfaction) was assessed through subjective postreading ratings and interpreted through eye-tracking data. The results showed that different forms of TM affected the reading experience. Effects of TMs on immersion, social presence, and satisfaction were identified, along with interaction effects between TM and FS on immersion, first fixation duration, and total fixation duration ratio. Specifically, reading experience at smaller FSs (8 pt) was more likely to be influenced by TMs. Regarding eye-tracking metrics, first fixation duration was positively correlated with immersion, and total fixation duration ratio was negatively correlated with immersion. Although no correlation was found between immersion and social presence, a negative correlation was found in the actual reading process (i.e., the stronger the perception of the social presence of TMs, the lower the immersion). These findings can provide insights useful for the design of TMs in social reading from a user-experience perspective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信