患者、转诊医生和放射科医生对向患者提供放射报告的意见随时间变化:系统回顾

Mohammad Alarifi, M Courtney Hughes, Abdulrahman M Jabour, Yazeed Alashban, Erin Vernon
{"title":"患者、转诊医生和放射科医生对向患者提供放射报告的意见随时间变化:系统回顾","authors":"Mohammad Alarifi, M Courtney Hughes, Abdulrahman M Jabour, Yazeed Alashban, Erin Vernon","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients increasingly have access to their radiology reports. This systematic review examined the opinions of patients, referring physicians, and radiologists over time on providing patients full access to their radiology reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review examining quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42023466502). Our search was conducted through September 30, 2023, and spanned five databases (CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, ProQuest, PubMed, and Scopus). The studies included were peer-reviewed journal articles about the opinions of patients, referring physicians, or radiologists regarding giving patients unrestricted access to their radiology reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening 4,520 articles, the full texts of 439 studies were assessed for eligibility. Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies showed that, over time, patients have consistently expressed a strong desire to access radiology reports, and referring physicians and radiologists have varied opinions about patient access to radiology reports. The main advantages of patient access found in the studies were enhanced understanding and empowerment and increased patient-physician engagement and communication. The main disadvantages were difficulties in patients understanding reports and patient anxiety from accessing reports. Referring physicians' opinions and radiologists' opinions were found in less than 20% (six studies) and 10% (three studies), respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The studies show patients have desired access to radiology reports over time. Future research should elicit the opinions of referring physicians and radiologists to enable a more informed design of patient access to radiology reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient, Referring Physician, and Radiologist Opinions Over Time on Providing Patients Access to Radiology Reports: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Alarifi, M Courtney Hughes, Abdulrahman M Jabour, Yazeed Alashban, Erin Vernon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients increasingly have access to their radiology reports. This systematic review examined the opinions of patients, referring physicians, and radiologists over time on providing patients full access to their radiology reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review examining quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42023466502). Our search was conducted through September 30, 2023, and spanned five databases (CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, ProQuest, PubMed, and Scopus). The studies included were peer-reviewed journal articles about the opinions of patients, referring physicians, or radiologists regarding giving patients unrestricted access to their radiology reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening 4,520 articles, the full texts of 439 studies were assessed for eligibility. Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies showed that, over time, patients have consistently expressed a strong desire to access radiology reports, and referring physicians and radiologists have varied opinions about patient access to radiology reports. The main advantages of patient access found in the studies were enhanced understanding and empowerment and increased patient-physician engagement and communication. The main disadvantages were difficulties in patients understanding reports and patient anxiety from accessing reports. Referring physicians' opinions and radiologists' opinions were found in less than 20% (six studies) and 10% (three studies), respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The studies show patients have desired access to radiology reports over time. Future research should elicit the opinions of referring physicians and radiologists to enable a more informed design of patient access to radiology reports.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:越来越多的患者可以获取他们的放射学报告。本系统综述研究了患者、转诊医生和放射科医生长期以来对向患者提供全面的放射学报告的意见:采用系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南(PROSPERO CRD42023466502)对定量、定性和混合方法研究进行了系统综述。我们的检索工作一直持续到 2023 年 9 月 30 日,共使用了五个数据库(CINAHL Plus、Web of Science、ProQuest、PubMed 和 Scopus)。所纳入的研究均为同行评审期刊文章,内容涉及患者、转诊医生或放射科医生对允许患者不受限制地查阅放射报告的看法:在筛选了 4520 篇文章后,对 439 项研究的全文进行了资格评估。有 33 项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究表明,随着时间的推移,患者一直表达了获取放射学报告的强烈愿望,而转诊医生和放射科医生对患者获取放射学报告的看法则各不相同。研究发现,患者获取报告的主要优点是增强了理解和能力,提高了患者与医生之间的参与度和沟通。主要缺点是患者难以理解报告,以及患者对获取报告感到焦虑。转诊医生的意见和放射科医生的意见分别不足 20%(6 项研究)和 10%(3 项研究):讨论:这些研究表明,随着时间的推移,患者希望获得放射科报告。未来的研究应征求转诊医生和放射科医生的意见,以便在更知情的情况下设计患者获取放射学报告的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient, Referring Physician, and Radiologist Opinions Over Time on Providing Patients Access to Radiology Reports: A Systematic Review.

Objective: Patients increasingly have access to their radiology reports. This systematic review examined the opinions of patients, referring physicians, and radiologists over time on providing patients full access to their radiology reports.

Methods: A systematic review examining quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42023466502). Our search was conducted through September 30, 2023, and spanned five databases (CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, ProQuest, PubMed, and Scopus). The studies included were peer-reviewed journal articles about the opinions of patients, referring physicians, or radiologists regarding giving patients unrestricted access to their radiology reports.

Results: After screening 4,520 articles, the full texts of 439 studies were assessed for eligibility. Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies showed that, over time, patients have consistently expressed a strong desire to access radiology reports, and referring physicians and radiologists have varied opinions about patient access to radiology reports. The main advantages of patient access found in the studies were enhanced understanding and empowerment and increased patient-physician engagement and communication. The main disadvantages were difficulties in patients understanding reports and patient anxiety from accessing reports. Referring physicians' opinions and radiologists' opinions were found in less than 20% (six studies) and 10% (three studies), respectively.

Discussion: The studies show patients have desired access to radiology reports over time. Future research should elicit the opinions of referring physicians and radiologists to enable a more informed design of patient access to radiology reports.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信