膝关节新鲜半月板同种异体移植后的初步疗效

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
James L Cook, James P Stannard, Kylee J Rucinski, Clayton W Nuelle, Cory R Crecelius, Cristi R Cook, Richard Ma
{"title":"膝关节新鲜半月板同种异体移植后的初步疗效","authors":"James L Cook, James P Stannard, Kylee J Rucinski, Clayton W Nuelle, Cory R Crecelius, Cristi R Cook, Richard Ma","doi":"10.1055/a-2389-9001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on recent evidence-based advances in meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT), fresh (viable) meniscus allografts have potential for mitigating key risk factors associated with MAT failure, and preclinical and clinical data have verified the safety of fresh meniscus allografts as well as possible efficacy advantages compared with fresh-frozen meniscus allografts. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for the initial cohort of patients undergoing MAT using fresh meniscus allografts at our center. Patients who were prospectively enrolled in a dedicated registry were included for analyses when they had undergone primary MAT using a fresh meniscus allograft for treatment of medial and/or lateral meniscus deficiency with at least 1-year follow-up data recorded. Forty-five patients with a mean final follow-up of 47.8 months (range = 12-90 months) were analyzed. The mean patient age was 30.7 years (range = 15-60 years), mean body mass index (BMI) was 29.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (range = 19-48 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and 14 patients (31%) were females. In total, 28 medial, 13 lateral, and 4 combined medial and lateral MATs with 23 concurrent ligament reconstructions and 2 concurrent osteotomies were included. No local or systemic adverse events or complications related to MAT were reported for any patient in the study. Treatment success rate for all patients combined was 91.1% with three patients requiring MAT revision and one patient requiring arthroplasty. Treatment failures occurred 8 to 34 months after MAT and all involved the medial meniscus. None of the variables assessed were significantly different between treatment success and treatment failure cohorts. Taken together, the data suggest that the use of fresh (viable) meniscus allografts can be considered a safe and effective option for medial and lateral MAT. When transplanted using double bone plug suspensory fixation with meniscotibial ligament reconstruction, fresh MATs were associated with a 91% success rate, absence of local or systemic adverse events or complications, and statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported measures of pain and function at a mean of 4 years postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial Outcomes following Fresh Meniscus Allograft Transplantation in the Knee.\",\"authors\":\"James L Cook, James P Stannard, Kylee J Rucinski, Clayton W Nuelle, Cory R Crecelius, Cristi R Cook, Richard Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2389-9001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Based on recent evidence-based advances in meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT), fresh (viable) meniscus allografts have potential for mitigating key risk factors associated with MAT failure, and preclinical and clinical data have verified the safety of fresh meniscus allografts as well as possible efficacy advantages compared with fresh-frozen meniscus allografts. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for the initial cohort of patients undergoing MAT using fresh meniscus allografts at our center. Patients who were prospectively enrolled in a dedicated registry were included for analyses when they had undergone primary MAT using a fresh meniscus allograft for treatment of medial and/or lateral meniscus deficiency with at least 1-year follow-up data recorded. Forty-five patients with a mean final follow-up of 47.8 months (range = 12-90 months) were analyzed. The mean patient age was 30.7 years (range = 15-60 years), mean body mass index (BMI) was 29.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (range = 19-48 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), and 14 patients (31%) were females. In total, 28 medial, 13 lateral, and 4 combined medial and lateral MATs with 23 concurrent ligament reconstructions and 2 concurrent osteotomies were included. No local or systemic adverse events or complications related to MAT were reported for any patient in the study. Treatment success rate for all patients combined was 91.1% with three patients requiring MAT revision and one patient requiring arthroplasty. Treatment failures occurred 8 to 34 months after MAT and all involved the medial meniscus. None of the variables assessed were significantly different between treatment success and treatment failure cohorts. Taken together, the data suggest that the use of fresh (viable) meniscus allografts can be considered a safe and effective option for medial and lateral MAT. When transplanted using double bone plug suspensory fixation with meniscotibial ligament reconstruction, fresh MATs were associated with a 91% success rate, absence of local or systemic adverse events or complications, and statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported measures of pain and function at a mean of 4 years postoperatively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2389-9001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2389-9001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据最近半月板同种异体移植(MAT)的循证进展,新鲜(存活)半月板同种异体移植物有可能减轻与 MAT 失败相关的关键风险因素,临床前和临床数据已验证了新鲜半月板同种异体移植物的安全性,以及与新鲜冷冻半月板同种异体移植物相比可能存在的疗效优势。本研究的目的是前瞻性地评估本中心使用新鲜半月板异体移植物进行 MAT 治疗的首批患者的临床疗效。前瞻性登记在册的患者只要接受过使用新鲜半月板同种异体材料治疗内侧和/或外侧半月板缺损的初次MAT手术,且至少有1年的随访数据记录,就会被纳入分析范围。45名患者的平均最终随访时间为47.8个月(12-90个月)。患者平均年龄为 30.7 岁(范围 = 15-60),平均体重指数为 29.7 kg/m2(范围 = 19-48),14 名患者(31%)为女性。共纳入了 28 例内侧、13 例外侧、4 例内侧和外侧联合 MAT,23 例同时进行了韧带重建,2 例同时进行了截骨术。研究中没有任何患者出现与 MAT 相关的局部或全身不良反应或并发症。所有患者的治疗成功率合计为91.1%,其中3名患者需要进行MAT翻修,1名患者需要进行关节成形术。治疗失败发生在 MAT 术后 8 至 34 个月,所有失败均涉及内侧半月板。治疗成功与治疗失败组别之间的评估变量均无明显差异。综上所述,这些数据表明,使用新鲜(存活的)半月板同种异体移植物进行内侧和外侧半月板同种异体移植物移植是一种安全有效的选择。在使用双骨栓悬吊固定和半月板胫腓韧带重建术进行移植时,新鲜半月板异体移植物的成功率为 91%,无局部或全身不良事件或并发症,术后平均 4 年,患者报告的疼痛和功能指标均有显著的统计学意义和临床意义的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial Outcomes following Fresh Meniscus Allograft Transplantation in the Knee.

Based on recent evidence-based advances in meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT), fresh (viable) meniscus allografts have potential for mitigating key risk factors associated with MAT failure, and preclinical and clinical data have verified the safety of fresh meniscus allografts as well as possible efficacy advantages compared with fresh-frozen meniscus allografts. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for the initial cohort of patients undergoing MAT using fresh meniscus allografts at our center. Patients who were prospectively enrolled in a dedicated registry were included for analyses when they had undergone primary MAT using a fresh meniscus allograft for treatment of medial and/or lateral meniscus deficiency with at least 1-year follow-up data recorded. Forty-five patients with a mean final follow-up of 47.8 months (range = 12-90 months) were analyzed. The mean patient age was 30.7 years (range = 15-60 years), mean body mass index (BMI) was 29.7 kg/m2 (range = 19-48 kg/m2), and 14 patients (31%) were females. In total, 28 medial, 13 lateral, and 4 combined medial and lateral MATs with 23 concurrent ligament reconstructions and 2 concurrent osteotomies were included. No local or systemic adverse events or complications related to MAT were reported for any patient in the study. Treatment success rate for all patients combined was 91.1% with three patients requiring MAT revision and one patient requiring arthroplasty. Treatment failures occurred 8 to 34 months after MAT and all involved the medial meniscus. None of the variables assessed were significantly different between treatment success and treatment failure cohorts. Taken together, the data suggest that the use of fresh (viable) meniscus allografts can be considered a safe and effective option for medial and lateral MAT. When transplanted using double bone plug suspensory fixation with meniscotibial ligament reconstruction, fresh MATs were associated with a 91% success rate, absence of local or systemic adverse events or complications, and statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported measures of pain and function at a mean of 4 years postoperatively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信