针对心血管疾病成人的双模式家庭心脏康复计划:单臂远程临床试验。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tim Bilbrey, Jenny Martin, Wen Zhou, Changhao Bai, Nitin Vaswani, Rishab Shah, Sara Chokshi, Xi Chen, Satjit Bhusri, Samantha Niemi, Hongdao Meng, Zhen Lei
{"title":"针对心血管疾病成人的双模式家庭心脏康复计划:单臂远程临床试验。","authors":"Tim Bilbrey, Jenny Martin, Wen Zhou, Changhao Bai, Nitin Vaswani, Rishab Shah, Sara Chokshi, Xi Chen, Satjit Bhusri, Samantha Niemi, Hongdao Meng, Zhen Lei","doi":"10.2196/59098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a safe, effective intervention for individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, a majority of eligible patients do not complete CR. Growing evidence suggests that home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) programs are comparable in effectiveness and safety with traditional center-based programs. More research is needed to explore different ways to deliver HBCR programs to patients with CVD.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the feasibility and impact of a digital HBCR program (RecoveryPlus.Health) that integrates both telehealth and mHealth modalities on functional exercise capacity, resting heart rate, and quality of life among adults with CVD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 12-week prospective, single-arm remote clinical trial used a within-subject design. We recruited adults with CVD (aged ≥40 years) from the community with a CR-eligible diagnosis (stable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and heart failure) between May and August 2023. All enrolled patients referred to the RPH clinic in Roanoke, Texas, were included. The care team provided guideline-concordant CR services to study participants via two modalities: (1) a synchronous telehealth exercise training through videoconferencing; and (2) an asynchronous mobile health (mHealth) coaching app (RPH app). Baseline intake survey, electronic health record, and app log data were used to extract individual characteristics, care processes, and platform engagement data. Feasibility was measured by program completion rate and CR service use. Efficacy was measured by changes in the 6-minute walk test, resting heart rate, and quality of life (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey) before and after the 12-week program. Paired t tests were used to examine pre- and postintervention changes in the outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 162 met the inclusion criteria and 75 (46.3%) consented and were enrolled (mean age 64, SD 10.30 years; male: n=37, 49%; White: n=46, 61%). Heart failure was the most common diagnosis (37/75, 49%). In total, 62/75 (83%) participants completed the 12-week study and used the telehealth modality with 9.63 (SD 3.33) sessions completed, and 59/75 (79%) used the mHealth modality with 10.97 (SD 11.70) sessions completed. Post intervention, 50/62 (81%) participants' performance in the 6-minute walk test had improved, with an average improvement of 40 (SD 63.39) m (95% CI 25.6-57.1). The average 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey's physical and mental summary scores improved by 2.7 (SD 6.47) points (95% CI 1.1-4.3) and 2.2 (SD 9.09) points (95% CI 0.1-4.5), respectively. There were no changes in resting heart rate and no exercise-related adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RecoveryPlus.Health digital HBCR program showed feasibility and efficacy in a group of nationally recruited patients with CVD. The findings add to the evidence that a telehealth and mHealth dual-modality HBCR program may be a promising approach to overcome some of the main barriers to improving CR access in the United States.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05804500; https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?cond=NCT05804500.</p>","PeriodicalId":14756,"journal":{"name":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","volume":" ","pages":"e59098"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Dual-Modality Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Adults With Cardiovascular Disease: Single-Arm Remote Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tim Bilbrey, Jenny Martin, Wen Zhou, Changhao Bai, Nitin Vaswani, Rishab Shah, Sara Chokshi, Xi Chen, Satjit Bhusri, Samantha Niemi, Hongdao Meng, Zhen Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/59098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a safe, effective intervention for individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, a majority of eligible patients do not complete CR. Growing evidence suggests that home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) programs are comparable in effectiveness and safety with traditional center-based programs. More research is needed to explore different ways to deliver HBCR programs to patients with CVD.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the feasibility and impact of a digital HBCR program (RecoveryPlus.Health) that integrates both telehealth and mHealth modalities on functional exercise capacity, resting heart rate, and quality of life among adults with CVD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 12-week prospective, single-arm remote clinical trial used a within-subject design. We recruited adults with CVD (aged ≥40 years) from the community with a CR-eligible diagnosis (stable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and heart failure) between May and August 2023. All enrolled patients referred to the RPH clinic in Roanoke, Texas, were included. The care team provided guideline-concordant CR services to study participants via two modalities: (1) a synchronous telehealth exercise training through videoconferencing; and (2) an asynchronous mobile health (mHealth) coaching app (RPH app). Baseline intake survey, electronic health record, and app log data were used to extract individual characteristics, care processes, and platform engagement data. Feasibility was measured by program completion rate and CR service use. Efficacy was measured by changes in the 6-minute walk test, resting heart rate, and quality of life (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey) before and after the 12-week program. Paired t tests were used to examine pre- and postintervention changes in the outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 162 met the inclusion criteria and 75 (46.3%) consented and were enrolled (mean age 64, SD 10.30 years; male: n=37, 49%; White: n=46, 61%). Heart failure was the most common diagnosis (37/75, 49%). In total, 62/75 (83%) participants completed the 12-week study and used the telehealth modality with 9.63 (SD 3.33) sessions completed, and 59/75 (79%) used the mHealth modality with 10.97 (SD 11.70) sessions completed. Post intervention, 50/62 (81%) participants' performance in the 6-minute walk test had improved, with an average improvement of 40 (SD 63.39) m (95% CI 25.6-57.1). The average 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey's physical and mental summary scores improved by 2.7 (SD 6.47) points (95% CI 1.1-4.3) and 2.2 (SD 9.09) points (95% CI 0.1-4.5), respectively. There were no changes in resting heart rate and no exercise-related adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RecoveryPlus.Health digital HBCR program showed feasibility and efficacy in a group of nationally recruited patients with CVD. The findings add to the evidence that a telehealth and mHealth dual-modality HBCR program may be a promising approach to overcome some of the main barriers to improving CR access in the United States.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05804500; https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?cond=NCT05804500.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR mHealth and uHealth\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e59098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480683/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR mHealth and uHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/59098\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏康复(CR)是针对心血管疾病(CVD)患者的一种安全有效的干预措施。然而,大多数符合条件的患者并没有完成心脏康复治疗。越来越多的证据表明,家庭心脏康复(HBCR)项目的有效性和安全性与传统的中心项目不相上下。需要开展更多研究,探索向心血管疾病患者提供 HBCR 项目的不同方法:本研究旨在评估数字 HBCR 项目(RecoveryPlus.Health,RPH-D)的可行性和影响,该项目整合了远程医疗和移动医疗模式,对患有心血管疾病(CVD)的成年人的功能锻炼能力、静息心率和生活质量均有影响:这项为期 12 周的前瞻性单臂远程临床试验采用受试者内设计。我们在 2023 年 5 月至 8 月间从社区招募了符合 CR 诊断条件(稳定型心绞痛、心肌梗死、心力衰竭等)的成年心血管疾病患者(40 岁以上)。所有转诊至德克萨斯州罗阿诺克市 RPH 诊所的入组患者均被纳入其中。护理团队通过两种方式为研究参与者提供与指南相一致的 CR 服务:1)通过视频会议进行同步远程医疗运动训练;2)异步移动医疗虚拟辅导应用程序(RPH App)。基线入组调查、电子健康记录 (EHR) 和应用程序日志数据用于提取个人特征、护理流程和远程保健/移动保健参与数据。可行性通过项目完成率和 CR 服务使用率来衡量。疗效通过 12 周计划前后 6 分钟步行测试 (6MWT)、静息心率和生活质量 (SF-12) 的变化来衡量。采用配对 t 检验来检测干预前后结果变量的变化:共有 162 人符合纳入标准,其中 75 人(46.3%)同意并加入。参与者的平均年龄为 64.24 岁(标准差 10.30);37 人(49%)为男性,46 人(61%)为白人。心力衰竭是最常见的诊断(49%)。共有 62 人(83%)完成了为期 12 周的研究,其中 62 人(83%)使用了远程医疗模式,平均完成了 9.63 次(标清 3.33 次)疗程,59 人(79%)使用了移动医疗模式,平均完成了 10.97 次(标清 11.70 次)疗程。干预后,50 名(81%)参与者的 6MWT 有所改善,平均改善 40.0 米(95% CI,25.6 至 57.1)。SF-12 身体和心理综合评分平均分别提高了 2.7 分(95% CI,1.1 至 4.3)和 2.2 分(95% CI,0.1 至 4.5)。静息心率没有变化,也没有与运动相关的不良事件报告:RecoveryPlus.Health数字HBCR计划在一组全国招募的心血管疾病患者中显示出可行性和有效性。这些研究结果进一步证明,远程医疗和移动医疗双模式 HBCR 计划可能是一种很有前景的方法,可以克服美国在提高 CR 普及率方面的一些主要障碍:临床试验:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05804500。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Dual-Modality Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Adults With Cardiovascular Disease: Single-Arm Remote Clinical Trial.

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a safe, effective intervention for individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, a majority of eligible patients do not complete CR. Growing evidence suggests that home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) programs are comparable in effectiveness and safety with traditional center-based programs. More research is needed to explore different ways to deliver HBCR programs to patients with CVD.

Objective: We aimed to assess the feasibility and impact of a digital HBCR program (RecoveryPlus.Health) that integrates both telehealth and mHealth modalities on functional exercise capacity, resting heart rate, and quality of life among adults with CVD.

Methods: This 12-week prospective, single-arm remote clinical trial used a within-subject design. We recruited adults with CVD (aged ≥40 years) from the community with a CR-eligible diagnosis (stable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and heart failure) between May and August 2023. All enrolled patients referred to the RPH clinic in Roanoke, Texas, were included. The care team provided guideline-concordant CR services to study participants via two modalities: (1) a synchronous telehealth exercise training through videoconferencing; and (2) an asynchronous mobile health (mHealth) coaching app (RPH app). Baseline intake survey, electronic health record, and app log data were used to extract individual characteristics, care processes, and platform engagement data. Feasibility was measured by program completion rate and CR service use. Efficacy was measured by changes in the 6-minute walk test, resting heart rate, and quality of life (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey) before and after the 12-week program. Paired t tests were used to examine pre- and postintervention changes in the outcome variables.

Results: In total, 162 met the inclusion criteria and 75 (46.3%) consented and were enrolled (mean age 64, SD 10.30 years; male: n=37, 49%; White: n=46, 61%). Heart failure was the most common diagnosis (37/75, 49%). In total, 62/75 (83%) participants completed the 12-week study and used the telehealth modality with 9.63 (SD 3.33) sessions completed, and 59/75 (79%) used the mHealth modality with 10.97 (SD 11.70) sessions completed. Post intervention, 50/62 (81%) participants' performance in the 6-minute walk test had improved, with an average improvement of 40 (SD 63.39) m (95% CI 25.6-57.1). The average 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey's physical and mental summary scores improved by 2.7 (SD 6.47) points (95% CI 1.1-4.3) and 2.2 (SD 9.09) points (95% CI 0.1-4.5), respectively. There were no changes in resting heart rate and no exercise-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: The RecoveryPlus.Health digital HBCR program showed feasibility and efficacy in a group of nationally recruited patients with CVD. The findings add to the evidence that a telehealth and mHealth dual-modality HBCR program may be a promising approach to overcome some of the main barriers to improving CR access in the United States.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05804500; https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?cond=NCT05804500.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
JMIR mHealth and uHealth Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (JMU, ISSN 2291-5222) is a spin-off journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR mHealth and uHealth is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and in June 2017 received a stunning inaugural Impact Factor of 4.636. The journal focusses on health and biomedical applications in mobile and tablet computing, pervasive and ubiquitous computing, wearable computing and domotics. JMIR mHealth and uHealth publishes since 2013 and was the first mhealth journal in Pubmed. It publishes even faster and has a broader scope with including papers which are more technical or more formative/developmental than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信