研究成就目标在 L2 学习中的作用:横向和纵向研究

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Enhao Feng, Chengchen Li
{"title":"研究成就目标在 L2 学习中的作用:横向和纵向研究","authors":"Enhao Feng,&nbsp;Chengchen Li","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Achievement goals (AGs) have been argued to influence general learning processes and outcomes, while their roles in L2 learning remain underexplored. This study, consisting of two sub-studies, aims to examine how different types of AGs (mastery-approach goals, performance-approach goals, mastery-avoidance goals, and performance-avoidance goals) contribute to overall and skill- (knowledge-)<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> specific L2 achievement (curriculum-based course exam scores) and proficiency (Cambridge English proficiency test scores) using cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. Participants of both sub-studies were 1,355 adolescent EFL learners from a junior high school in rural China. In Sub-study 1, the students participated in a questionnaire survey, an end-term English exam, and a Cambridge English proficiency test. Path analysis results showed that different AGs predicted overall and skill-specific L2 achievement and proficiency with variations. In Sub-study 2, the same participants completed three waves of questionnaire surveys and end-term exams spanned over three 6-month semesters. Cross-lagged panel modelling results indicated that AGs positively influenced subsequent achievement, but the effects were unstable; achievement positively and stably influenced subsequent AGs. Our findings provide implications for L2 teachers to help their students set goals to close their achievement gap and reach their full L2 potential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 103438"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the role of achievement goals in L2 learning: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study\",\"authors\":\"Enhao Feng,&nbsp;Chengchen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.system.2024.103438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Achievement goals (AGs) have been argued to influence general learning processes and outcomes, while their roles in L2 learning remain underexplored. This study, consisting of two sub-studies, aims to examine how different types of AGs (mastery-approach goals, performance-approach goals, mastery-avoidance goals, and performance-avoidance goals) contribute to overall and skill- (knowledge-)<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> specific L2 achievement (curriculum-based course exam scores) and proficiency (Cambridge English proficiency test scores) using cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. Participants of both sub-studies were 1,355 adolescent EFL learners from a junior high school in rural China. In Sub-study 1, the students participated in a questionnaire survey, an end-term English exam, and a Cambridge English proficiency test. Path analysis results showed that different AGs predicted overall and skill-specific L2 achievement and proficiency with variations. In Sub-study 2, the same participants completed three waves of questionnaire surveys and end-term exams spanned over three 6-month semesters. Cross-lagged panel modelling results indicated that AGs positively influenced subsequent achievement, but the effects were unstable; achievement positively and stably influenced subsequent AGs. Our findings provide implications for L2 teachers to help their students set goals to close their achievement gap and reach their full L2 potential.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002203\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002203","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

成就目标(AGs)被认为会影响一般的学习过程和结果,但它们在 L2 学习中的作用仍未得到充分探索。本研究由两项子研究组成,旨在通过横向和纵向方法,探讨不同类型的成就目标(掌握-目标、成绩-目标、掌握-回避目标和成绩-回避目标)如何促进总体和技能(知识)1 具体的语言学习成绩(基于课程的课程考试成绩)和能力(剑桥英语水平测试成绩)。两项子研究的参与者都是来自中国农村一所初中的 1355 名青少年 EFL 学习者。在子研究 1 中,学生参加了问卷调查、期末英语考试和剑桥英语水平测试。路径分析结果表明,不同的AGs对总体和特定技能的L2成绩和能力有不同的预测作用。在子研究 2 中,同样的参与者在三个为期 6 个月的学期中完成了三轮问卷调查和期末考试。交叉滞后面板建模结果表明,AGs 对后续成绩有积极影响,但这种影响并不稳定;成绩对后续 AGs 有积极稳定的影响。我们的研究结果为 L2 教师提供了帮助学生设定目标以缩小成绩差距并充分发挥其 L2 潜力的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the role of achievement goals in L2 learning: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study

Achievement goals (AGs) have been argued to influence general learning processes and outcomes, while their roles in L2 learning remain underexplored. This study, consisting of two sub-studies, aims to examine how different types of AGs (mastery-approach goals, performance-approach goals, mastery-avoidance goals, and performance-avoidance goals) contribute to overall and skill- (knowledge-)1 specific L2 achievement (curriculum-based course exam scores) and proficiency (Cambridge English proficiency test scores) using cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. Participants of both sub-studies were 1,355 adolescent EFL learners from a junior high school in rural China. In Sub-study 1, the students participated in a questionnaire survey, an end-term English exam, and a Cambridge English proficiency test. Path analysis results showed that different AGs predicted overall and skill-specific L2 achievement and proficiency with variations. In Sub-study 2, the same participants completed three waves of questionnaire surveys and end-term exams spanned over three 6-month semesters. Cross-lagged panel modelling results indicated that AGs positively influenced subsequent achievement, but the effects were unstable; achievement positively and stably influenced subsequent AGs. Our findings provide implications for L2 teachers to help their students set goals to close their achievement gap and reach their full L2 potential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信