髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼内翻术后的最小临床意义差异 (MCID)、实质性临床获益 (SCB) 和患者可接受症状状态 (PASS) 值高度依赖于研究人群和计算方法:系统回顾。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Preston M Terle, Liam A Peebles, Arjun Verma, Matthew J Kraeutler
{"title":"髋关节镜治疗股骨髋臼内翻术后的最小临床意义差异 (MCID)、实质性临床获益 (SCB) 和患者可接受症状状态 (PASS) 值高度依赖于研究人群和计算方法:系统回顾。","authors":"Preston M Terle, Liam A Peebles, Arjun Verma, Matthew J Kraeutler","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide a summary of available literature on the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted via the Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase to identify studies that calculated MCID, SCB, or PASS for Patient Reported Outcome Measures PROMs after hip arthroscopy for FAI. The electronic search strategy used was as follows: hip AND arthroscopy AND (MCID OR \"minimal clinically important difference\" OR SCB OR \"substantial clinical benefit\" OR PASS OR \"patient acceptable symptom state\"). Inclusion criteria were English language studies published from 1980 to 2023 reporting clinical outcome scores and calculated values of MCID, PASS, or SCB for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two studies (5 level II, 19 level III, and 18 level IV) met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most commonly used outcome measures across MCID, SCB, and PASS were the Hip Outcome Score sports-specific subscale (HOS-SSS) and the activities of daily living subscale (HOS-ADL), the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and the twelve-item international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). The range of MCID values for HOS-SSS, HOS-ADL, mHHS, and iHOT-12 were 7.2-15.7, 7.3-15.4, 7.2-16.8, and 8.8-16.2 respectively. Similarly, for SCB the values ranged from 77.9-96.9, 90.4-98.5, 20.0-98.4, and 66.7-87.5, respectively. Lastly, the PASS values ranged from 63.9-80.9, 85.9-99.2, 74.0-97.0, and 59.5-86.0, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MCID, SCB, and PASS values for PROMs following hip arthroscopy for the management of FAI are highly dependent on their associated study including study population and calculation methods.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Values Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Are Highly Dependent on Their Study Population and Calculation Methods: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Preston M Terle, Liam A Peebles, Arjun Verma, Matthew J Kraeutler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide a summary of available literature on the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted via the Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase to identify studies that calculated MCID, SCB, or PASS for Patient Reported Outcome Measures PROMs after hip arthroscopy for FAI. The electronic search strategy used was as follows: hip AND arthroscopy AND (MCID OR \\\"minimal clinically important difference\\\" OR SCB OR \\\"substantial clinical benefit\\\" OR PASS OR \\\"patient acceptable symptom state\\\"). Inclusion criteria were English language studies published from 1980 to 2023 reporting clinical outcome scores and calculated values of MCID, PASS, or SCB for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two studies (5 level II, 19 level III, and 18 level IV) met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most commonly used outcome measures across MCID, SCB, and PASS were the Hip Outcome Score sports-specific subscale (HOS-SSS) and the activities of daily living subscale (HOS-ADL), the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and the twelve-item international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). The range of MCID values for HOS-SSS, HOS-ADL, mHHS, and iHOT-12 were 7.2-15.7, 7.3-15.4, 7.2-16.8, and 8.8-16.2 respectively. Similarly, for SCB the values ranged from 77.9-96.9, 90.4-98.5, 20.0-98.4, and 66.7-87.5, respectively. Lastly, the PASS values ranged from 63.9-80.9, 85.9-99.2, 74.0-97.0, and 59.5-86.0, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MCID, SCB, and PASS values for PROMs following hip arthroscopy for the management of FAI are highly dependent on their associated study including study population and calculation methods.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:提供有关股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)髋关节镜术后最小临床意义差异(MCID)、实质性临床获益(SCB)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)的现有文献摘要:通过 Cochrane 图书馆、Pubmed、Ovid MEDLINE 和 Embase 进行了系统性回顾,以确定计算 FAI 髋关节镜术后患者报告结果指标 PROMs 的 MCID、SCB 或 PASS 的研究。使用的电子检索策略如下:髋关节和关节镜和(MCID 或 "最小临床重要性差异 "或 SCB 或 "实质性临床获益 "或 PASS 或 "患者可接受的症状状态")。纳入标准为1980年至2023年发表的、报告因FAI接受髋关节镜检查的患者临床结果评分和MCID、PASS或SCB计算值的英文研究:42项研究(5项II级、19项III级和18项IV级)符合纳入和排除标准。在MCID、SCB和PASS中最常用的结果测量方法是髋关节结果评分运动特异性分量表(HOS-SSS)和日常生活活动分量表(HOS-ADL)、改良哈里斯髋关节评分(mHHS)和12项国际髋关节结果工具(iHOT-12)。HOS-SSS、HOS-ADL、mHHS 和 iHOT-12 的 MCID 值范围分别为 7.2-15.7、7.3-15.4、7.2-16.8 和 8.8-16.2。同样,SCB 的数值范围分别为 77.9-96.9、90.4-98.5、20.0-98.4 和 66.7-87.5。最后,PASS 值分别为 63.9-80.9、85.9-99.2、74.0-97.0 和 59.5-86.0:髋关节镜治疗 FAI 后 PROMs 的 MCID、SCB 和 PASS 值在很大程度上取决于相关研究,包括研究人群和计算方法:IV级,对II-IV级研究的系统回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Values Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Are Highly Dependent on Their Study Population and Calculation Methods: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: To provide a summary of available literature on the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

Methods: A systematic review was conducted via the Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase to identify studies that calculated MCID, SCB, or PASS for Patient Reported Outcome Measures PROMs after hip arthroscopy for FAI. The electronic search strategy used was as follows: hip AND arthroscopy AND (MCID OR "minimal clinically important difference" OR SCB OR "substantial clinical benefit" OR PASS OR "patient acceptable symptom state"). Inclusion criteria were English language studies published from 1980 to 2023 reporting clinical outcome scores and calculated values of MCID, PASS, or SCB for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI.

Results: Forty-two studies (5 level II, 19 level III, and 18 level IV) met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most commonly used outcome measures across MCID, SCB, and PASS were the Hip Outcome Score sports-specific subscale (HOS-SSS) and the activities of daily living subscale (HOS-ADL), the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and the twelve-item international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12). The range of MCID values for HOS-SSS, HOS-ADL, mHHS, and iHOT-12 were 7.2-15.7, 7.3-15.4, 7.2-16.8, and 8.8-16.2 respectively. Similarly, for SCB the values ranged from 77.9-96.9, 90.4-98.5, 20.0-98.4, and 66.7-87.5, respectively. Lastly, the PASS values ranged from 63.9-80.9, 85.9-99.2, 74.0-97.0, and 59.5-86.0, respectively.

Conclusion: MCID, SCB, and PASS values for PROMs following hip arthroscopy for the management of FAI are highly dependent on their associated study including study population and calculation methods.

Level of evidence: IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信