心力衰竭虚弱评估量表:开发与心理测量验证

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ying-Cheng Chao, Chieh-Yu Liu, Huei-Fong Hung, Chii-Ming Lee, Shu-Pen Hsu, Ai-Fu Chiou
{"title":"心力衰竭虚弱评估量表:开发与心理测量验证","authors":"Ying-Cheng Chao, Chieh-Yu Liu, Huei-Fong Hung, Chii-Ming Lee, Shu-Pen Hsu, Ai-Fu Chiou","doi":"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty is common in patients with heart failure. Specific scales, including the Clinical Frailty Scale, exist but have not undergone thorough psychometric validation among patients with heart failure.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Frailty Assessment Scale for Heart Failure (FAS-HF) in patients with heart failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 3 phases. In phase I, conceptualization and item generation, the FAS-HF was initially developed through the analysis of qualitative research data and a literature review. In phase II, item selection and content validity, the Delphi method was used to gather experts' opinions and suggestions regarding the FAS-HF. In phase III, field testing and psychometric evaluation, a cross-sectional study of 184 patients with heart failure in northern Taiwan was conducted to test the reliability and validity of the FAS-HF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 15-item FAS-HF included the physical, psychological, and social frailty domains. The total score ranged from 0 to 45, with higher scores representing frailer individuals. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the cumulative loading variance was 57.39%. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness-of-fit index (0.91), adjusted goodness-of-fit index (0.87), and root mean square error of approximation (0.06) were acceptable for model fit. Acceptable reliability was found, with a Cronbach α coefficient of 0.87 and a test-retest reliability of 0.99. Compared with the Fried frailty phenotype, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.94, and the optimal cutoff score for frailty was 20.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FAS-HF has good reliability, validity, and discrimination and can be used as a frailty indicator for patients with heart failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":54868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty Assessment Scale for Heart Failure: Development and Psychometric Validation.\",\"authors\":\"Ying-Cheng Chao, Chieh-Yu Liu, Huei-Fong Hung, Chii-Ming Lee, Shu-Pen Hsu, Ai-Fu Chiou\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty is common in patients with heart failure. Specific scales, including the Clinical Frailty Scale, exist but have not undergone thorough psychometric validation among patients with heart failure.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Frailty Assessment Scale for Heart Failure (FAS-HF) in patients with heart failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 3 phases. In phase I, conceptualization and item generation, the FAS-HF was initially developed through the analysis of qualitative research data and a literature review. In phase II, item selection and content validity, the Delphi method was used to gather experts' opinions and suggestions regarding the FAS-HF. In phase III, field testing and psychometric evaluation, a cross-sectional study of 184 patients with heart failure in northern Taiwan was conducted to test the reliability and validity of the FAS-HF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 15-item FAS-HF included the physical, psychological, and social frailty domains. The total score ranged from 0 to 45, with higher scores representing frailer individuals. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the cumulative loading variance was 57.39%. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness-of-fit index (0.91), adjusted goodness-of-fit index (0.87), and root mean square error of approximation (0.06) were acceptable for model fit. Acceptable reliability was found, with a Cronbach α coefficient of 0.87 and a test-retest reliability of 0.99. Compared with the Fried frailty phenotype, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.94, and the optimal cutoff score for frailty was 20.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FAS-HF has good reliability, validity, and discrimination and can be used as a frailty indicator for patients with heart failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚弱是心力衰竭患者的常见病。目前已有包括临床虚弱量表(Clinical Frailty Scale)在内的特定量表,但尚未在心衰患者中进行全面的心理计量学验证:本研究的目的是在心衰患者中开发并验证心衰患者体弱评估量表(FAS-HF):本研究包括三个阶段。在第一阶段,即概念化和项目生成阶段,通过分析定性研究数据和文献综述,初步开发了 FAS-HF。在第二阶段,即项目选择和内容效度阶段,采用德尔菲法收集专家对 FAS-HF 的意见和建议。在第三阶段,即实地测试和心理测量评估阶段,对台湾北部的 184 名心衰患者进行了横断面研究,以检验 FAS-HF 的信度和效度:结果:15 个项目的 FAS-HF 包括身体、心理和社会虚弱领域。总分从 0 到 45 分不等,得分越高代表越虚弱。探索性因子分析显示,累积载荷方差为 57.39%。在确认性因子分析中,模型拟合的良好度指数(0.91)、调整后的良好度指数(0.87)和均方根近似误差(0.06)均可接受。该模型的信度可以接受,Cronbach α系数为0.87,测试-再测信度为0.99。与弗里德虚弱表型相比,接收者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.94,虚弱的最佳临界值为 20.结论:FAS-HF具有良好的可靠性、有效性和区分度,可用作心衰患者的虚弱指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frailty Assessment Scale for Heart Failure: Development and Psychometric Validation.

Background: Frailty is common in patients with heart failure. Specific scales, including the Clinical Frailty Scale, exist but have not undergone thorough psychometric validation among patients with heart failure.

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Frailty Assessment Scale for Heart Failure (FAS-HF) in patients with heart failure.

Methods: This study included 3 phases. In phase I, conceptualization and item generation, the FAS-HF was initially developed through the analysis of qualitative research data and a literature review. In phase II, item selection and content validity, the Delphi method was used to gather experts' opinions and suggestions regarding the FAS-HF. In phase III, field testing and psychometric evaluation, a cross-sectional study of 184 patients with heart failure in northern Taiwan was conducted to test the reliability and validity of the FAS-HF.

Results: The 15-item FAS-HF included the physical, psychological, and social frailty domains. The total score ranged from 0 to 45, with higher scores representing frailer individuals. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the cumulative loading variance was 57.39%. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness-of-fit index (0.91), adjusted goodness-of-fit index (0.87), and root mean square error of approximation (0.06) were acceptable for model fit. Acceptable reliability was found, with a Cronbach α coefficient of 0.87 and a test-retest reliability of 0.99. Compared with the Fried frailty phenotype, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.94, and the optimal cutoff score for frailty was 20.

Conclusions: The FAS-HF has good reliability, validity, and discrimination and can be used as a frailty indicator for patients with heart failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing is one of the leading journals for advanced practice nurses in cardiovascular care, providing thorough coverage of timely topics and information that is extremely practical for daily, on-the-job use. Each issue addresses the physiologic, psychologic, and social needs of cardiovascular patients and their families in a variety of environments. Regular columns include By the Bedside, Progress in Prevention, Pharmacology, Dysrhythmias, and Outcomes Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信