利用机器学习推进急诊科分诊预测,优化腹痛手术患者的分诊。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1177/15533506241273449
Chen Chai, Shu-Zhen Peng, Rui Zhang, Cheng-Wei Li, Yan Zhao
{"title":"利用机器学习推进急诊科分诊预测,优化腹痛手术患者的分诊。","authors":"Chen Chai, Shu-Zhen Peng, Rui Zhang, Cheng-Wei Li, Yan Zhao","doi":"10.1177/15533506241273449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of emergency department (ED) triage systems remains challenging in accurately differentiating patients with acute abdominal pain (AAP) who are critical and urgent for surgery due to subjectivity and limitations. We use machine learning models to predict emergency surgical abdominal pain patients in triage, and then compare their performance with conventional Logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 38 214 patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between March 1, 2014, and March 1, 2022, we identified all adult patients (aged ≥18 years). We utilized routinely available triage data in electronic medical records as predictors, including structured data (eg, triage vital signs, gender, and age) and unstructured data (chief complaints and physical examinations in free-text format). The primary outcome measure was whether emergency surgery was performed. The dataset was randomly sampled, with 80% assigned to the training set and 20% to the test set. We developed 5 machine learning models: Light Gradient Boosting Machine (Light GBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Random Forest (RF). Logistic regression (LR) served as the reference model. Model performance was calculated for each model, including the area under the receiver-work characteristic curve (AUC) and net benefit (decision curve), as well as the confusion matrix.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all the 38 214 acute abdominal pain patients, 4208 underwent emergency abdominal surgery while 34 006 received non-surgical treatment. In the surgery outcome prediction, all 4 machine learning models outperformed the reference model (eg, AUC, 0.899 [95%CI 0.891-0.903] in the Light GBM vs. 0.885 [95%CI 0.876-0.891] in the reference model), Similarly, most machine learning models exhibited significant improvements in net reclassification compared to the reference model (eg, NRIs of 0.0812[95%CI, 0.055-0.1105] in the XGBoost), with the exception of the RF model. Decision curve analysis shows that across the entire range of thresholds, the net benefits of the XGBoost and the Light GBM models were higher than the reference model. In particular, the Light GBM model performed well in predicting the need for emergency abdominal surgery with higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models have demonstrated superior performance in predicting emergency abdominal pain surgery compared to traditional models. Modern machine learning improves clinical triage decisions and ensures that critically needy patients receive priority for emergency resources and timely, effective treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Emergency Department Triage Prediction With Machine Learning to Optimize Triage for Abdominal Pain Surgery Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Chen Chai, Shu-Zhen Peng, Rui Zhang, Cheng-Wei Li, Yan Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506241273449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of emergency department (ED) triage systems remains challenging in accurately differentiating patients with acute abdominal pain (AAP) who are critical and urgent for surgery due to subjectivity and limitations. We use machine learning models to predict emergency surgical abdominal pain patients in triage, and then compare their performance with conventional Logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 38 214 patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between March 1, 2014, and March 1, 2022, we identified all adult patients (aged ≥18 years). We utilized routinely available triage data in electronic medical records as predictors, including structured data (eg, triage vital signs, gender, and age) and unstructured data (chief complaints and physical examinations in free-text format). The primary outcome measure was whether emergency surgery was performed. The dataset was randomly sampled, with 80% assigned to the training set and 20% to the test set. We developed 5 machine learning models: Light Gradient Boosting Machine (Light GBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Random Forest (RF). Logistic regression (LR) served as the reference model. Model performance was calculated for each model, including the area under the receiver-work characteristic curve (AUC) and net benefit (decision curve), as well as the confusion matrix.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all the 38 214 acute abdominal pain patients, 4208 underwent emergency abdominal surgery while 34 006 received non-surgical treatment. In the surgery outcome prediction, all 4 machine learning models outperformed the reference model (eg, AUC, 0.899 [95%CI 0.891-0.903] in the Light GBM vs. 0.885 [95%CI 0.876-0.891] in the reference model), Similarly, most machine learning models exhibited significant improvements in net reclassification compared to the reference model (eg, NRIs of 0.0812[95%CI, 0.055-0.1105] in the XGBoost), with the exception of the RF model. Decision curve analysis shows that across the entire range of thresholds, the net benefits of the XGBoost and the Light GBM models were higher than the reference model. In particular, the Light GBM model performed well in predicting the need for emergency abdominal surgery with higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models have demonstrated superior performance in predicting emergency abdominal pain surgery compared to traditional models. Modern machine learning improves clinical triage decisions and ensures that critically needy patients receive priority for emergency resources and timely, effective treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241273449\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506241273449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于主观性和局限性,急诊科(ED)分诊系统的开发在准确区分危重和急需手术的急性腹痛(AAP)患者方面仍面临挑战。我们使用机器学习模型预测急诊手术腹痛患者的分诊情况,然后将其性能与传统的 Logistic 回归模型进行比较:利用2014年3月1日至2022年3月1日期间在武汉大学中南医院就诊的38 214名急性腹痛患者,我们确定了所有成年患者(年龄≥18岁)。我们利用电子病历中的常规分诊数据作为预测指标,包括结构化数据(如分诊生命体征、性别和年龄)和非结构化数据(自由文本格式的主诉和体格检查)。主要结果指标是是否进行了急诊手术。数据集是随机抽样的,其中 80% 分配到训练集,20% 分配到测试集。我们开发了 5 个机器学习模型:轻梯度提升机(Light Gradient Boosting Machine,Light GBM)、极端梯度提升(eXtreme Gradient Boosting,XGBoost)、深度神经网络(Deep Neural Network,DNN)和随机森林(Random Forest,RF)。逻辑回归(LR)作为参考模型。计算了每个模型的性能,包括接收工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和净效益(决策曲线)以及混淆矩阵:在所有 38 214 名急性腹痛患者中,4 208 人接受了急诊腹部手术,34 006 人接受了非手术治疗。在手术结果预测方面,所有 4 个机器学习模型的表现都优于参考模型(例如,轻型 GBM 的 AUC 为 0.899 [95%CI 0.891-0.903] vs. 参考模型的 AUC 为 0.885 [95%CI 0.876-0.891] )。同样,与参考模型相比,大多数机器学习模型的净再分类能力都有显著提高(例如,XGBoost 的 NRIs 为 0.0812[95%CI, 0.055-0.1105]),RF 模型除外。决策曲线分析表明,在整个阈值范围内,XGBoost 和 Light GBM 模型的净效益均高于参考模型。特别是,Light GBM 模型在预测急诊腹部手术需求方面表现出色,具有更高的灵敏度、特异性和准确性:与传统模型相比,机器学习模型在预测急诊腹痛手术方面表现优异。现代机器学习改进了临床分诊决策,确保急需的患者优先获得急救资源和及时有效的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing Emergency Department Triage Prediction With Machine Learning to Optimize Triage for Abdominal Pain Surgery Patients.

Background: The development of emergency department (ED) triage systems remains challenging in accurately differentiating patients with acute abdominal pain (AAP) who are critical and urgent for surgery due to subjectivity and limitations. We use machine learning models to predict emergency surgical abdominal pain patients in triage, and then compare their performance with conventional Logistic regression models.

Methods: Using 38 214 patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between March 1, 2014, and March 1, 2022, we identified all adult patients (aged ≥18 years). We utilized routinely available triage data in electronic medical records as predictors, including structured data (eg, triage vital signs, gender, and age) and unstructured data (chief complaints and physical examinations in free-text format). The primary outcome measure was whether emergency surgery was performed. The dataset was randomly sampled, with 80% assigned to the training set and 20% to the test set. We developed 5 machine learning models: Light Gradient Boosting Machine (Light GBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Random Forest (RF). Logistic regression (LR) served as the reference model. Model performance was calculated for each model, including the area under the receiver-work characteristic curve (AUC) and net benefit (decision curve), as well as the confusion matrix.

Results: Of all the 38 214 acute abdominal pain patients, 4208 underwent emergency abdominal surgery while 34 006 received non-surgical treatment. In the surgery outcome prediction, all 4 machine learning models outperformed the reference model (eg, AUC, 0.899 [95%CI 0.891-0.903] in the Light GBM vs. 0.885 [95%CI 0.876-0.891] in the reference model), Similarly, most machine learning models exhibited significant improvements in net reclassification compared to the reference model (eg, NRIs of 0.0812[95%CI, 0.055-0.1105] in the XGBoost), with the exception of the RF model. Decision curve analysis shows that across the entire range of thresholds, the net benefits of the XGBoost and the Light GBM models were higher than the reference model. In particular, the Light GBM model performed well in predicting the need for emergency abdominal surgery with higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Conclusions: Machine learning models have demonstrated superior performance in predicting emergency abdominal pain surgery compared to traditional models. Modern machine learning improves clinical triage decisions and ensures that critically needy patients receive priority for emergency resources and timely, effective treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信