基于电子健康记录(EHR)的风险计算器可预测与 FRAX 相当的骨折:概念验证研究。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Osteoporosis International Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1007/s00198-024-07221-2
Rajesh K Jain, Eric Polley, Mark Weiner, Amy Iwamaye, Elbert Huang, Tamara Vokes
{"title":"基于电子健康记录(EHR)的风险计算器可预测与 FRAX 相当的骨折:概念验证研究。","authors":"Rajesh K Jain, Eric Polley, Mark Weiner, Amy Iwamaye, Elbert Huang, Tamara Vokes","doi":"10.1007/s00198-024-07221-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Information in the electronic health record (EHR), such as diagnoses, vital signs, utilization, medications, and laboratory values, may predict fractures well without the need to verbally ascertain risk factors. In our study, as a proof of concept, we developed and internally validated a fracture risk calculator using only information in the EHR.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fracture risk calculators, such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, or FRAX, typically lie outside the clinician workflow. Conversely, the electronic health record (EHR) is at the center of the clinical workflow, and many variables in the EHR could predict fractures without having to verbally ascertain FRAX risk factors. We sought to evaluate the utility of EHR variables to predict fractures and, as a proof of concept, to create an EHR-based fracture risk model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Routine clinical data from 24,189 subjects presenting to primary care from 2010 to 2018 was utilized. Major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) were captured by physician diagnosis codes. Data was split into training (n = 18,141) and test sets (n = 6048). We fit Cox regression models for candidate risk factors in the training set, and then created a global model using a backward stepwise approach. We then applied the model to the test set and compared the discrimination and calibration to FRAX.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found variables related to vital signs, utilization, diagnoses, medications, and laboratory values to be associated with incident MOF. Our final model included 19 variables, including age, BMI, Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease, and albumin levels. When applied to the test set, we found the discrimination (AUC 0.73 vs. 0.70, p = 0.08) and calibration were comparable to FRAX.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routinely collected data in EHR systems can generate adequate fracture predictions without the need to verbally ascertain fracture risk factors. In the future, this could allow for automated fracture prediction at the point of care to improve osteoporosis screening and treatment rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19638,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis International","volume":" ","pages":"2117-2126"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An electronic health record (EHR)-based risk calculator can predict fractures comparably to FRAX: a proof-of-concept study.\",\"authors\":\"Rajesh K Jain, Eric Polley, Mark Weiner, Amy Iwamaye, Elbert Huang, Tamara Vokes\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00198-024-07221-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Information in the electronic health record (EHR), such as diagnoses, vital signs, utilization, medications, and laboratory values, may predict fractures well without the need to verbally ascertain risk factors. In our study, as a proof of concept, we developed and internally validated a fracture risk calculator using only information in the EHR.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fracture risk calculators, such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, or FRAX, typically lie outside the clinician workflow. Conversely, the electronic health record (EHR) is at the center of the clinical workflow, and many variables in the EHR could predict fractures without having to verbally ascertain FRAX risk factors. We sought to evaluate the utility of EHR variables to predict fractures and, as a proof of concept, to create an EHR-based fracture risk model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Routine clinical data from 24,189 subjects presenting to primary care from 2010 to 2018 was utilized. Major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) were captured by physician diagnosis codes. Data was split into training (n = 18,141) and test sets (n = 6048). We fit Cox regression models for candidate risk factors in the training set, and then created a global model using a backward stepwise approach. We then applied the model to the test set and compared the discrimination and calibration to FRAX.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found variables related to vital signs, utilization, diagnoses, medications, and laboratory values to be associated with incident MOF. Our final model included 19 variables, including age, BMI, Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease, and albumin levels. When applied to the test set, we found the discrimination (AUC 0.73 vs. 0.70, p = 0.08) and calibration were comparable to FRAX.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routinely collected data in EHR systems can generate adequate fracture predictions without the need to verbally ascertain fracture risk factors. In the future, this could allow for automated fracture prediction at the point of care to improve osteoporosis screening and treatment rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoporosis International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2117-2126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoporosis International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07221-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07221-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子健康记录(EHR)中的信息,如诊断、生命体征、使用情况、药物和实验室值等,可以很好地预测骨折情况,而无需口头确定风险因素。在我们的研究中,作为概念验证,我们仅使用电子病历中的信息就开发出了骨折风险计算器,并在内部进行了验证:骨折风险计算器(如骨折风险评估工具或 FRAX)通常不属于临床医生的工作流程。相反,电子健康记录(EHR)是临床工作流程的中心,EHR 中的许多变量都可以预测骨折,而无需口头确定 FRAX 风险因素。我们试图评估电子病历变量对预测骨折的实用性,并作为概念验证,创建一个基于电子病历的骨折风险模型:我们利用了 2010 年至 2018 年期间 24189 名初级保健对象的常规临床数据。主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)由医生诊断代码捕获。数据分为训练集(n = 18141)和测试集(n = 6048)。我们针对训练集中的候选风险因素拟合了 Cox 回归模型,然后采用后向逐步法创建了一个全局模型。然后,我们将模型应用于测试集,并比较了与 FRAX 的区分度和校准:结果:我们发现与生命体征、使用情况、诊断、药物和实验室值相关的变量与 MOF 事件有关。我们的最终模型包含 19 个变量,包括年龄、体重指数、帕金森病、慢性肾病和白蛋白水平。当应用于测试集时,我们发现其区分度(AUC 0.73 vs. 0.70,p = 0.08)和校准效果与 FRAX 相当:结论:电子病历系统中的常规收集数据可以生成充分的骨折预测,而无需口头确定骨折风险因素。结论:电子病历系统中的常规收集数据可生成适当的骨折预测结果,而无需口头确认骨折风险因素。未来,这将允许在护理点进行自动骨折预测,以提高骨质疏松症筛查和治疗率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An electronic health record (EHR)-based risk calculator can predict fractures comparably to FRAX: a proof-of-concept study.

An electronic health record (EHR)-based risk calculator can predict fractures comparably to FRAX: a proof-of-concept study.

Information in the electronic health record (EHR), such as diagnoses, vital signs, utilization, medications, and laboratory values, may predict fractures well without the need to verbally ascertain risk factors. In our study, as a proof of concept, we developed and internally validated a fracture risk calculator using only information in the EHR.

Purpose: Fracture risk calculators, such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, or FRAX, typically lie outside the clinician workflow. Conversely, the electronic health record (EHR) is at the center of the clinical workflow, and many variables in the EHR could predict fractures without having to verbally ascertain FRAX risk factors. We sought to evaluate the utility of EHR variables to predict fractures and, as a proof of concept, to create an EHR-based fracture risk model.

Methods: Routine clinical data from 24,189 subjects presenting to primary care from 2010 to 2018 was utilized. Major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) were captured by physician diagnosis codes. Data was split into training (n = 18,141) and test sets (n = 6048). We fit Cox regression models for candidate risk factors in the training set, and then created a global model using a backward stepwise approach. We then applied the model to the test set and compared the discrimination and calibration to FRAX.

Results: We found variables related to vital signs, utilization, diagnoses, medications, and laboratory values to be associated with incident MOF. Our final model included 19 variables, including age, BMI, Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease, and albumin levels. When applied to the test set, we found the discrimination (AUC 0.73 vs. 0.70, p = 0.08) and calibration were comparable to FRAX.

Conclusion: Routinely collected data in EHR systems can generate adequate fracture predictions without the need to verbally ascertain fracture risk factors. In the future, this could allow for automated fracture prediction at the point of care to improve osteoporosis screening and treatment rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis International
Osteoporosis International 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An international multi-disciplinary journal which is a joint initiative between the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, Osteoporosis International provides a forum for the communication and exchange of current ideas concerning the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and management of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. It publishes: original papers - reporting progress and results in all areas of osteoporosis and its related fields; review articles - reflecting the present state of knowledge in special areas of summarizing limited themes in which discussion has led to clearly defined conclusions; educational articles - giving information on the progress of a topic of particular interest; case reports - of uncommon or interesting presentations of the condition. While focusing on clinical research, the Journal will also accept submissions on more basic aspects of research, where they are considered by the editors to be relevant to the human disease spectrum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信