使用动态胸片检查膈肌麻痹患者的膈肌运动和肺投影面积。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-90
Ziyang Xia, Chuming Peng, Liyuan Fan, Qiongzhu Chen, Wentao Liu, Ting Ma, Weicong Chen, Yaocheng Wen, Yuquan Song, Haibo Lin
{"title":"使用动态胸片检查膈肌麻痹患者的膈肌运动和肺投影面积。","authors":"Ziyang Xia, Chuming Peng, Liyuan Fan, Qiongzhu Chen, Wentao Liu, Ting Ma, Weicong Chen, Yaocheng Wen, Yuquan Song, Haibo Lin","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a novel and supplementary examination in respiratory diseases. The investigation of other chest diseases using DCR has been explored, identifying a certain correlation of the pulmonary function test (PFT). However, there is a lack of research using DCR parameters to quantitatively evaluate chest disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of DCR for diaphragm paralysis (DP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study recruited 118 participants, which include 18 patients with DP, 48 healthy volunteers, and 52 patients with respiratory disease. Comparison of DCR parameters relationships among 3 groups was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis test. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the value of the DCR parameters to diagnose DP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The differences of excursion of diaphragm (ED) in normal (nb) and forced breathing (fb), ED(fb)-ED(nb), and the parameters of projected lung area (PLA) in inspiratory (ins) and expiratory phase (exp), PLA.exp(fb), PLA.ins(fb)-PLA.ins(nb), and PLA.exp(fb)-PLA.exp(nb) among the 3 groups were statistically significant. The highest area under the curve (AUC) of right-side parameter was the ED(fb)-ED(nb), for which the AUC was 0.8950 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7618-1.000], whereas that of the left-side parameter was ED(fb), for which the AUC was 0.9176 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8524-0.9829].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The parameters of DCR have good diagnostic value for DP. The highest diagnostic efficiency for DP on the right side is the ED(fb)-ED(nb), with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 78.6%, whereas on the left side is ED(fb), with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 88.2%.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of diaphragmatic motion and projected lung area in diaphragm paralysis patients using dynamic chest radiography.\",\"authors\":\"Ziyang Xia, Chuming Peng, Liyuan Fan, Qiongzhu Chen, Wentao Liu, Ting Ma, Weicong Chen, Yaocheng Wen, Yuquan Song, Haibo Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/qims-24-90\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a novel and supplementary examination in respiratory diseases. The investigation of other chest diseases using DCR has been explored, identifying a certain correlation of the pulmonary function test (PFT). However, there is a lack of research using DCR parameters to quantitatively evaluate chest disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of DCR for diaphragm paralysis (DP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study recruited 118 participants, which include 18 patients with DP, 48 healthy volunteers, and 52 patients with respiratory disease. Comparison of DCR parameters relationships among 3 groups was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis test. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the value of the DCR parameters to diagnose DP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The differences of excursion of diaphragm (ED) in normal (nb) and forced breathing (fb), ED(fb)-ED(nb), and the parameters of projected lung area (PLA) in inspiratory (ins) and expiratory phase (exp), PLA.exp(fb), PLA.ins(fb)-PLA.ins(nb), and PLA.exp(fb)-PLA.exp(nb) among the 3 groups were statistically significant. The highest area under the curve (AUC) of right-side parameter was the ED(fb)-ED(nb), for which the AUC was 0.8950 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7618-1.000], whereas that of the left-side parameter was ED(fb), for which the AUC was 0.9176 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8524-0.9829].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The parameters of DCR have good diagnostic value for DP. The highest diagnostic efficiency for DP on the right side is the ED(fb)-ED(nb), with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 78.6%, whereas on the left side is ED(fb), with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 88.2%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320492/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-90\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-90","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:动态胸部放射摄影 (DCR) 是呼吸系统疾病的一种新型辅助检查方法。利用 DCR 对其他胸部疾病进行检查的探索,发现与肺功能测试 (PFT) 有一定的相关性。然而,使用 DCR 参数对胸部疾病进行定量评估的研究还很缺乏。本研究旨在探讨 DCR 对膈肌麻痹(DP)的诊断价值:这项回顾性研究招募了 118 名参与者,其中包括 18 名膈肌麻痹患者、48 名健康志愿者和 52 名呼吸系统疾病患者。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Kruskal-Wallis检验比较了3组患者的DCR参数关系。使用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)比较 DCR 参数对诊断 DP 的价值:结果:正常呼吸(nb)和强迫呼吸(fb)时的膈肌偏移量(ED)、ED(fb)-ED(nb),以及吸气期(ins)和呼气期(exp)的肺投影面积(PLA)参数、PLA.exp(fb)、PLA.ins(fb)-PLA.ins(nb)、PLA.exp(fb)-PLA.exp(nb),3组间差异均有统计学意义。右侧参数中曲线下面积(AUC)最高的是ED(fb)-ED(nb),其AUC为0.8950[95%置信区间(CI):0.7618-1.000],而左侧参数中曲线下面积最高的是ED(fb),其AUC为0.9176[95%置信区间(CI):0.8524-0.9829]:结论:DCR参数对DP具有良好的诊断价值。结论:DCR参数对DP具有很好的诊断价值。对右侧DP诊断效率最高的是ED(fb)-ED(nb),灵敏度为95%,特异性为78.6%;而对左侧DP诊断效率最高的是ED(fb),灵敏度为80%,特异性为88.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of diaphragmatic motion and projected lung area in diaphragm paralysis patients using dynamic chest radiography.

Background: Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a novel and supplementary examination in respiratory diseases. The investigation of other chest diseases using DCR has been explored, identifying a certain correlation of the pulmonary function test (PFT). However, there is a lack of research using DCR parameters to quantitatively evaluate chest disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of DCR for diaphragm paralysis (DP).

Methods: This retrospective study recruited 118 participants, which include 18 patients with DP, 48 healthy volunteers, and 52 patients with respiratory disease. Comparison of DCR parameters relationships among 3 groups was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis test. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the value of the DCR parameters to diagnose DP.

Results: The differences of excursion of diaphragm (ED) in normal (nb) and forced breathing (fb), ED(fb)-ED(nb), and the parameters of projected lung area (PLA) in inspiratory (ins) and expiratory phase (exp), PLA.exp(fb), PLA.ins(fb)-PLA.ins(nb), and PLA.exp(fb)-PLA.exp(nb) among the 3 groups were statistically significant. The highest area under the curve (AUC) of right-side parameter was the ED(fb)-ED(nb), for which the AUC was 0.8950 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7618-1.000], whereas that of the left-side parameter was ED(fb), for which the AUC was 0.9176 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8524-0.9829].

Conclusions: The parameters of DCR have good diagnostic value for DP. The highest diagnostic efficiency for DP on the right side is the ED(fb)-ED(nb), with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 78.6%, whereas on the left side is ED(fb), with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 88.2%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信