利用三维卷积神经网络预测计算机断层扫描(CT)图像上肺腺癌患者的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变状态。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-33
Guojin Zhang, Lan Shang, Yuntai Cao, Jing Zhang, Shenglin Li, Rong Qian, Huan Liu, Zhuoli Zhang, Hong Pu, Qiong Man, Weifang Kong
{"title":"利用三维卷积神经网络预测计算机断层扫描(CT)图像上肺腺癌患者的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变状态。","authors":"Guojin Zhang, Lan Shang, Yuntai Cao, Jing Zhang, Shenglin Li, Rong Qian, Huan Liu, Zhuoli Zhang, Hong Pu, Qiong Man, Weifang Kong","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noninvasively detecting epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma patients before targeted therapy remains a challenge. This study aimed to develop a 3-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning model to predict <i>EGFR</i> mutation status using computed tomography (CT) images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected 660 patients from 2 large medical centers. The patients were divided into training (n=528) and external test (n=132) sets according to hospital source. The CNN model was trained in a supervised end-to-end manner, and its performance was evaluated using an external test set. To compare the performance of the CNN model, we constructed 1 clinical and 3 radiomics models. Furthermore, we constructed a comprehensive model combining the highest-performing radiomics and CNN models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used as primary measures of performance for each model. Delong test was used to compare performance differences between different models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the clinical [training set, area under the curve (AUC) =69.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.661-0.732; test set, AUC =68.4%, 95% CI, 0.609-0.752] and the highest-performing radiomics models (training set, AUC =84.3%, 95% CI, 0.812-0.873; test set, AUC =72.4%, 95% CI, 0.653-0.794) models, the CNN model (training set, AUC =94.3%, 95% CI, 0.920-0.961; test set, AUC =94.7%, 95% CI, 0.894-0.978) had significantly better predictive performance for predicting <i>EGFR</i> mutation status. In addition, compared with the comprehensive model (training set, AUC =95.7%, 95% CI, 0.942-0.971; test set, AUC =87.4%, 95% CI, 0.820-0.924), the CNN model had better stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CNN model has excellent performance in non-invasively predicting <i>EGFR</i> mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma and is expected to become an auxiliary tool for clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma patients on computed tomography (CT) images using 3-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network.\",\"authors\":\"Guojin Zhang, Lan Shang, Yuntai Cao, Jing Zhang, Shenglin Li, Rong Qian, Huan Liu, Zhuoli Zhang, Hong Pu, Qiong Man, Weifang Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/qims-24-33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noninvasively detecting epidermal growth factor receptor (<i>EGFR</i>) mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma patients before targeted therapy remains a challenge. This study aimed to develop a 3-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning model to predict <i>EGFR</i> mutation status using computed tomography (CT) images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected 660 patients from 2 large medical centers. The patients were divided into training (n=528) and external test (n=132) sets according to hospital source. The CNN model was trained in a supervised end-to-end manner, and its performance was evaluated using an external test set. To compare the performance of the CNN model, we constructed 1 clinical and 3 radiomics models. Furthermore, we constructed a comprehensive model combining the highest-performing radiomics and CNN models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used as primary measures of performance for each model. Delong test was used to compare performance differences between different models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the clinical [training set, area under the curve (AUC) =69.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.661-0.732; test set, AUC =68.4%, 95% CI, 0.609-0.752] and the highest-performing radiomics models (training set, AUC =84.3%, 95% CI, 0.812-0.873; test set, AUC =72.4%, 95% CI, 0.653-0.794) models, the CNN model (training set, AUC =94.3%, 95% CI, 0.920-0.961; test set, AUC =94.7%, 95% CI, 0.894-0.978) had significantly better predictive performance for predicting <i>EGFR</i> mutation status. In addition, compared with the comprehensive model (training set, AUC =95.7%, 95% CI, 0.942-0.971; test set, AUC =87.4%, 95% CI, 0.820-0.924), the CNN model had better stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CNN model has excellent performance in non-invasively predicting <i>EGFR</i> mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma and is expected to become an auxiliary tool for clinicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320524/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-33\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-33","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在靶向治疗前,无创检测肺腺癌患者的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变状态仍是一项挑战。本研究旨在开发一种基于三维卷积神经网络(CNN)的深度学习模型,利用计算机断层扫描(CT)图像预测表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变状态:我们回顾性地收集了来自 2 个大型医疗中心的 660 名患者。根据医院来源,患者被分为训练集(528 人)和外部测试集(132 人)。CNN 模型采用端到端监督方式进行训练,并使用外部测试集评估其性能。为了比较 CNN 模型的性能,我们构建了 1 个临床模型和 3 个放射组学模型。此外,我们还构建了一个综合模型,将性能最高的放射组学模型和 CNN 模型结合在一起。接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)是衡量每个模型性能的主要指标。德隆检验用于比较不同模型之间的性能差异:与临床模型[训练集,曲线下面积(AUC)=69.6%,95% 置信区间(CI),0.661-0.732;测试集,AUC =68.4%,95% CI,0.609-0.752]和性能最高的放射组学模型(训练集,AUC =84.3%,95% CI,0.812-0.873;测试集,AUC =72.4%,95% CI,0.653-0.794)模型,CNN 模型(训练集,AUC =94.3%,95% CI,0.920-0.961;测试集,AUC =94.7%,95% CI,0.894-0.978)对预测 EGFR 突变状态的预测性能明显更好。此外,与综合模型(训练集,AUC =95.7%,95% CI,0.942-0.971;测试集,AUC =87.4%,95% CI,0.820-0.924)相比,CNN 模型具有更好的稳定性:CNN模型在无创预测肺腺癌患者的表皮生长因子受体突变状态方面表现出色,有望成为临床医生的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma patients on computed tomography (CT) images using 3-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network.

Background: Noninvasively detecting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma patients before targeted therapy remains a challenge. This study aimed to develop a 3-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning model to predict EGFR mutation status using computed tomography (CT) images.

Methods: We retrospectively collected 660 patients from 2 large medical centers. The patients were divided into training (n=528) and external test (n=132) sets according to hospital source. The CNN model was trained in a supervised end-to-end manner, and its performance was evaluated using an external test set. To compare the performance of the CNN model, we constructed 1 clinical and 3 radiomics models. Furthermore, we constructed a comprehensive model combining the highest-performing radiomics and CNN models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used as primary measures of performance for each model. Delong test was used to compare performance differences between different models.

Results: Compared with the clinical [training set, area under the curve (AUC) =69.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.661-0.732; test set, AUC =68.4%, 95% CI, 0.609-0.752] and the highest-performing radiomics models (training set, AUC =84.3%, 95% CI, 0.812-0.873; test set, AUC =72.4%, 95% CI, 0.653-0.794) models, the CNN model (training set, AUC =94.3%, 95% CI, 0.920-0.961; test set, AUC =94.7%, 95% CI, 0.894-0.978) had significantly better predictive performance for predicting EGFR mutation status. In addition, compared with the comprehensive model (training set, AUC =95.7%, 95% CI, 0.942-0.971; test set, AUC =87.4%, 95% CI, 0.820-0.924), the CNN model had better stability.

Conclusions: The CNN model has excellent performance in non-invasively predicting EGFR mutation status in patients with lung adenocarcinoma and is expected to become an auxiliary tool for clinicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信