利用小鼠进行多囊肾病研究的机器人超声波和新型胶原分析。

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Caroline R Sussman, Heather L Holmes, Alison Stiller, Ka Thao, Adriana V Gregory, Deema Anaam, Ryan Meloche, Yaman Mkhaimer, Harrison H Wells, Luiz D Vasconcelos, Matthew W Urban, Slobodan I Macura, Peter C Harris, Timothy L Kline, Michael F Romero
{"title":"利用小鼠进行多囊肾病研究的机器人超声波和新型胶原分析。","authors":"Caroline R Sussman, Heather L Holmes, Alison Stiller, Ka Thao, Adriana V Gregory, Deema Anaam, Ryan Meloche, Yaman Mkhaimer, Harrison H Wells, Luiz D Vasconcelos, Matthew W Urban, Slobodan I Macura, Peter C Harris, Timothy L Kline, Michael F Romero","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000000000542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>3D imaging and histology are critical tools for assessing polycystic kidney disease ( PKD ) in patients and animal models. Magnetic resonance ( MR ) imaging provides micron resolution, but is time consuming, expensive, and access to equipment and expertise is limiting. Robotic ultrasound ( US ) imaging has lower spatial resolution but is faster, more cost effective, and accessible. Similarly, Picrosirius red ( PSR ) staining and brightfield microscopy is commonly used to assess fibrosis; however, alternative methods have been shown in non-kidney tissues to provide greater sensitivity and more detailed structural characterization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we evaluated the utility of robotic US and alternative methods of quantifying PSR staining for PKD research. We compared longitudinal total kidney volume ( TKV ) measurements using US and MR. We additionally compared PSR imaging and quantification using standard brightfield with that by circularly polarized light with hue analysis, and fluorescence imaging analyzed using CT-FIRE software for automatic detection of individual collagen fibers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased TKV was detected by US in Pkd1RC/RC vs wild type ( WT ) at timepoints spanning early to established disease. US inter-observer variability was greater but allowed scanning in 2-5 minutes/mouse while MR required 20-30 minutes/mouse. While no change in fibrotic index was detected in this cohort of relatively mild disease using brightfield, polarized light showed fibers skewed thinner in Pkd1RC/RC vs WT. Fluorescence imaging showed a higher density of collagen fibers in Pkd1RC/RC vs WT, and fibers were thinner and curvier with no change in length. Additionally, fiber density was higher in both glomeruli and tubules in Pkd1RC/RC , and glomeruli had a higher fiber density than tubules in Pkd1RC/RC , and trended higher in WT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These studies show robotic ultrasound is a rigorous imaging tool for pre-clinical PKD research. Additionally, they demonstrate the increased sensitivity of polarized and fluorescence analysis of PSR-stained collagen.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic Ultrasound and Novel Collagen Analyses for Polycystic Kidney Disease Research Using Mice.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline R Sussman, Heather L Holmes, Alison Stiller, Ka Thao, Adriana V Gregory, Deema Anaam, Ryan Meloche, Yaman Mkhaimer, Harrison H Wells, Luiz D Vasconcelos, Matthew W Urban, Slobodan I Macura, Peter C Harris, Timothy L Kline, Michael F Romero\",\"doi\":\"10.34067/KID.0000000000000542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>3D imaging and histology are critical tools for assessing polycystic kidney disease ( PKD ) in patients and animal models. Magnetic resonance ( MR ) imaging provides micron resolution, but is time consuming, expensive, and access to equipment and expertise is limiting. Robotic ultrasound ( US ) imaging has lower spatial resolution but is faster, more cost effective, and accessible. Similarly, Picrosirius red ( PSR ) staining and brightfield microscopy is commonly used to assess fibrosis; however, alternative methods have been shown in non-kidney tissues to provide greater sensitivity and more detailed structural characterization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we evaluated the utility of robotic US and alternative methods of quantifying PSR staining for PKD research. We compared longitudinal total kidney volume ( TKV ) measurements using US and MR. We additionally compared PSR imaging and quantification using standard brightfield with that by circularly polarized light with hue analysis, and fluorescence imaging analyzed using CT-FIRE software for automatic detection of individual collagen fibers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased TKV was detected by US in Pkd1RC/RC vs wild type ( WT ) at timepoints spanning early to established disease. US inter-observer variability was greater but allowed scanning in 2-5 minutes/mouse while MR required 20-30 minutes/mouse. While no change in fibrotic index was detected in this cohort of relatively mild disease using brightfield, polarized light showed fibers skewed thinner in Pkd1RC/RC vs WT. Fluorescence imaging showed a higher density of collagen fibers in Pkd1RC/RC vs WT, and fibers were thinner and curvier with no change in length. Additionally, fiber density was higher in both glomeruli and tubules in Pkd1RC/RC , and glomeruli had a higher fiber density than tubules in Pkd1RC/RC , and trended higher in WT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These studies show robotic ultrasound is a rigorous imaging tool for pre-clinical PKD research. Additionally, they demonstrate the increased sensitivity of polarized and fluorescence analysis of PSR-stained collagen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney360\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000000000542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000000000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:三维成像和组织学是评估患者和动物模型多囊肾病(PKD)的重要工具。磁共振(MR)成像具有微米级分辨率,但耗时长、价格昂贵,而且设备和专业知识的获取受到限制。机器人超声(US)成像的空间分辨率较低,但速度更快、成本效益更高、更容易获得。同样,毕克西里乌斯红(PSR)染色和明视野显微镜通常用于评估纤维化;但在非肾组织中,替代方法已被证明能提供更高的灵敏度和更详细的结构特征:在这项研究中,我们评估了机器人US和其他PSR染色量化方法在PKD研究中的实用性。我们比较了使用 US 和 MR 进行的纵向肾脏总体积 (TKV) 测量。此外,我们还比较了使用标准明视野和圆偏振光进行 PSR 成像和量化的色调分析,以及使用 CT-FIRE 软件自动检测单个胶原纤维的荧光成像分析:结果:在疾病早期到成熟期的时间点上,通过 US 检测到 Pkd1RC/RC 与野生型(WT)的 TKV 增加。US 观察者之间的差异较大,但扫描时间为 2-5 分钟/只小鼠,而 MR 需要 20-30 分钟/只小鼠。在这批病情相对较轻的小鼠中,明视野没有检测到纤维化指数的变化,但偏振光显示 Pkd1RC/RC 与 WT 相比,纤维更细。荧光成像显示,Pkd1RC/RC 与 WT 相比,胶原纤维密度更高,纤维更细、更弯曲,但长度没有变化。此外,Pkd1RC/RC 肾小球和肾小管中的纤维密度均较高,Pkd1RC/RC 肾小球的纤维密度高于肾小管,WT 肾小球的纤维密度也呈上升趋势:这些研究表明,机器人超声是临床前PKD研究的一种严谨的成像工具。结论:这些研究表明,机器人超声是临床前 PKD 研究的一种严谨的成像工具。此外,它们还证明了对 PSR 染色胶原进行偏振和荧光分析可提高灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robotic Ultrasound and Novel Collagen Analyses for Polycystic Kidney Disease Research Using Mice.

Background: 3D imaging and histology are critical tools for assessing polycystic kidney disease ( PKD ) in patients and animal models. Magnetic resonance ( MR ) imaging provides micron resolution, but is time consuming, expensive, and access to equipment and expertise is limiting. Robotic ultrasound ( US ) imaging has lower spatial resolution but is faster, more cost effective, and accessible. Similarly, Picrosirius red ( PSR ) staining and brightfield microscopy is commonly used to assess fibrosis; however, alternative methods have been shown in non-kidney tissues to provide greater sensitivity and more detailed structural characterization.

Methods: In this study, we evaluated the utility of robotic US and alternative methods of quantifying PSR staining for PKD research. We compared longitudinal total kidney volume ( TKV ) measurements using US and MR. We additionally compared PSR imaging and quantification using standard brightfield with that by circularly polarized light with hue analysis, and fluorescence imaging analyzed using CT-FIRE software for automatic detection of individual collagen fibers.

Results: Increased TKV was detected by US in Pkd1RC/RC vs wild type ( WT ) at timepoints spanning early to established disease. US inter-observer variability was greater but allowed scanning in 2-5 minutes/mouse while MR required 20-30 minutes/mouse. While no change in fibrotic index was detected in this cohort of relatively mild disease using brightfield, polarized light showed fibers skewed thinner in Pkd1RC/RC vs WT. Fluorescence imaging showed a higher density of collagen fibers in Pkd1RC/RC vs WT, and fibers were thinner and curvier with no change in length. Additionally, fiber density was higher in both glomeruli and tubules in Pkd1RC/RC , and glomeruli had a higher fiber density than tubules in Pkd1RC/RC , and trended higher in WT.

Conclusions: These studies show robotic ultrasound is a rigorous imaging tool for pre-clinical PKD research. Additionally, they demonstrate the increased sensitivity of polarized and fluorescence analysis of PSR-stained collagen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信