1 磷酸腺苷受体调节剂治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Omar Mahmud, Asad Saulat Fatimi, Muhammad Umar Mahar, Arshia Jahangir, Aleena Kashif, Manzar Abbas, Akbar K Waljee, Jeffrey A Berinstein
{"title":"1 磷酸腺苷受体调节剂治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。","authors":"Omar Mahmud, Asad Saulat Fatimi, Muhammad Umar Mahar, Arshia Jahangir, Aleena Kashif, Manzar Abbas, Akbar K Waljee, Jeffrey A Berinstein","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs) are an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). This review summarizes all available randomized trial data on the efficacy and safety of S1PRM therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple publication databases were systematically searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) of adults with moderate to severe UC treated with S1PRMs. Random effects meta-analysis was performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool, and the overall quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 7 RCTs (1737 patients) involving the use of S1PRMs for moderate to severe UC. During induction, S1PRM therapy was efficacious when compared with placebo for clinical remission [RR: 2.65 (95% CI: 2.00, 3.53)], clinical response [RR: 1.68 (95% CI: 1.48, 1.91)], endoscopic improvement [RR: 2.17 (95% CI: 1.76, 2.68)], endoscopic normalization [RR: 2.56 (95% CI: 1.58, 3.83)], mucosal healing [RR: 2.88 (95% CI: 1.94, 4.26)], and histologic remission [RR: 2.42 (95% CI: 1.60, 3.66)]. Similar results were seen throughout the maintenance peroid, although fewer data were available to pool; notably, both sustained [RR: 3.57 (95% CI: 1.23, 10.35)] and steroid-free [RR: 2.92 (95% CI: 1.35, 6.33)] remission were significantly increased by S1PRM. There were no significant differences in adverse events [RR: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.15)] and infections [RR: 1.15 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.60)] between S1PRM and placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pooling of RCT data confirms that S1PRM therapy is both effective and safe for patients with moderate to severe UC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":"58 8","pages":"753-763"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Omar Mahmud, Asad Saulat Fatimi, Muhammad Umar Mahar, Arshia Jahangir, Aleena Kashif, Manzar Abbas, Akbar K Waljee, Jeffrey A Berinstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs) are an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). This review summarizes all available randomized trial data on the efficacy and safety of S1PRM therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple publication databases were systematically searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) of adults with moderate to severe UC treated with S1PRMs. Random effects meta-analysis was performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool, and the overall quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 7 RCTs (1737 patients) involving the use of S1PRMs for moderate to severe UC. During induction, S1PRM therapy was efficacious when compared with placebo for clinical remission [RR: 2.65 (95% CI: 2.00, 3.53)], clinical response [RR: 1.68 (95% CI: 1.48, 1.91)], endoscopic improvement [RR: 2.17 (95% CI: 1.76, 2.68)], endoscopic normalization [RR: 2.56 (95% CI: 1.58, 3.83)], mucosal healing [RR: 2.88 (95% CI: 1.94, 4.26)], and histologic remission [RR: 2.42 (95% CI: 1.60, 3.66)]. Similar results were seen throughout the maintenance peroid, although fewer data were available to pool; notably, both sustained [RR: 3.57 (95% CI: 1.23, 10.35)] and steroid-free [RR: 2.92 (95% CI: 1.35, 6.33)] remission were significantly increased by S1PRM. There were no significant differences in adverse events [RR: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.15)] and infections [RR: 1.15 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.60)] between S1PRM and placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pooling of RCT data confirms that S1PRM therapy is both effective and safe for patients with moderate to severe UC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"58 8\",\"pages\":\"753-763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:1- 磷酸腺苷受体调节剂(S1PRMs)是治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的有效药物。本综述总结了有关S1PRM疗法疗效和安全性的所有可用随机试验数据:方法:我们在多个出版物数据库中系统地搜索了中度至重度 UC 患者接受 S1PRMs 治疗的随机对照试验 (RCT)。进行了随机效应荟萃分析。使用 Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 工具评估了偏倚风险,并使用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)对证据的总体质量进行了评级:我们确定了 7 项涉及使用 S1PRMs 治疗中度至重度 UC 的 RCT(1737 例患者)。在诱导期间,与安慰剂相比,S1PRM疗法在临床缓解[RR:2.65 (95% CI:2.00, 3.53)]、临床反应[RR:1.68 (95% CI:1.48, 1.91)]、内镜改善[RR:2.17(95% CI:1.76,2.68)]、内镜正常化[RR:2.56(95% CI:1.58,3.83)]、粘膜愈合[RR:2.88(95% CI:1.94,4.26)]和组织学缓解[RR:2.42(95% CI:1.60,3.66)]。类似的结果也出现在整个维持治疗期间,尽管可供汇总的数据较少;值得注意的是,S1PRM 可显著提高持续缓解率[RR:3.57 (95% CI:1.23, 10.35)]和无类固醇缓解率[RR:2.92 (95% CI:1.35, 6.33)]。S1PRM与安慰剂在不良事件[RR:1.02(95% CI:0.90,1.15)]和感染[RR:1.15(95% CI:0.82,1.60)]方面无明显差异:汇总研究数据证实,S1PRM疗法对中重度UC患者既有效又安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background and aims: Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs) are an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). This review summarizes all available randomized trial data on the efficacy and safety of S1PRM therapy.

Methods: Multiple publication databases were systematically searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) of adults with moderate to severe UC treated with S1PRMs. Random effects meta-analysis was performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool, and the overall quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results: We identified 7 RCTs (1737 patients) involving the use of S1PRMs for moderate to severe UC. During induction, S1PRM therapy was efficacious when compared with placebo for clinical remission [RR: 2.65 (95% CI: 2.00, 3.53)], clinical response [RR: 1.68 (95% CI: 1.48, 1.91)], endoscopic improvement [RR: 2.17 (95% CI: 1.76, 2.68)], endoscopic normalization [RR: 2.56 (95% CI: 1.58, 3.83)], mucosal healing [RR: 2.88 (95% CI: 1.94, 4.26)], and histologic remission [RR: 2.42 (95% CI: 1.60, 3.66)]. Similar results were seen throughout the maintenance peroid, although fewer data were available to pool; notably, both sustained [RR: 3.57 (95% CI: 1.23, 10.35)] and steroid-free [RR: 2.92 (95% CI: 1.35, 6.33)] remission were significantly increased by S1PRM. There were no significant differences in adverse events [RR: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.15)] and infections [RR: 1.15 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.60)] between S1PRM and placebo.

Conclusion: Pooling of RCT data confirms that S1PRM therapy is both effective and safe for patients with moderate to severe UC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信