了解法律环境对 DEI 工作的影响

Michael Porter Esq.
{"title":"了解法律环境对 DEI 工作的影响","authors":"Michael Porter Esq.","doi":"10.1002/cala.41425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It's been just over a year since the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in <i>Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College and University of North Carolina</i>, 600 US 181 (2023). That June 29, 2023 decision effectively eliminated the ability for institutions of higher education to consider an individuals’ protected status as a factor in admissions decisions designed to advance diversity. The Supreme Court found that Harvard's and North Carolina's consideration of protected status in admissions couldn’t satisfy strict scrutiny. The programs therefore violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understand impact of legal landscape on DEI efforts\",\"authors\":\"Michael Porter Esq.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cala.41425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>It's been just over a year since the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in <i>Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College and University of North Carolina</i>, 600 US 181 (2023). That June 29, 2023 decision effectively eliminated the ability for institutions of higher education to consider an individuals’ protected status as a factor in admissions decisions designed to advance diversity. The Supreme Court found that Harvard's and North Carolina's consideration of protected status in admissions couldn’t satisfy strict scrutiny. The programs therefore violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Campus Legal Advisor\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Campus Legal Advisor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cala.41425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campus Legal Advisor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cala.41425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自美国最高法院在 "学生公平入学公司诉哈佛大学和北卡罗来纳大学校长及研究员案"(600 US 181 (2023))中做出判决以来,一年多的时间过去了。2023 年 6 月 29 日的这一判决有效地取消了高等教育机构在做出旨在促进多样性的招生决定时将个人受保护身份作为考虑因素的能力。最高法院认为,哈佛大学和北卡罗来纳州在招生中对受保护身份的考虑不能满足严格审查的要求。因此,这些计划违反了美国宪法的平等保护条款和 1964 年民权法案的第六章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understand impact of legal landscape on DEI efforts

It's been just over a year since the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College and University of North Carolina, 600 US 181 (2023). That June 29, 2023 decision effectively eliminated the ability for institutions of higher education to consider an individuals’ protected status as a factor in admissions decisions designed to advance diversity. The Supreme Court found that Harvard's and North Carolina's consideration of protected status in admissions couldn’t satisfy strict scrutiny. The programs therefore violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信