将模拟后汇报作为自我反思和提高认识的踏脚石--定性研究。

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sissel Eikeland Husebø, Inger Åse Reierson, Anette Hansen, Hilde Solli
{"title":"将模拟后汇报作为自我反思和提高认识的踏脚石--定性研究。","authors":"Sissel Eikeland Husebø, Inger Åse Reierson, Anette Hansen, Hilde Solli","doi":"10.1186/s41077-024-00306-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The voice of the students should be engaged in simulation curriculum development. Involving the students in the development of debriefing strategies might result in a deeper understanding of learning. However, few studies have investigated the students' perspectives on debriefing strategies. The aim of the study was to explore nursing students' perspectives on the post-simulation debriefing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explorative, descriptive design with a qualitative approach was used. Data were collected in December 2017 and May 2018 through focus group interviews with undergraduate nursing students in Norway immediately after a 2-day high-fidelity simulation course in the second year of their Bachelor of Nursing degree. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two nursing students participated in the study. The data analysis identified two main categories. The category 'Facilitator as a catalyst for reflection' illustrated the facilitator's multifaceted and vital role in initiating and guiding the students' reflection process in the debriefing. The category 'A process towards increased awareness' encompasses the students' guided process of acquiring new insight into their professional development, and how they put parts together to see the wholeness in what was simulated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides knowledge to facilitators regarding nursing students' perspectives on facilitating reflection and learning during debriefing discussions. The facilitator's multifaceted role in guiding the students' reflections and their process of acquiring new insight into their professional development were identified as critical to learning during debriefing.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"9 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-simulation debriefing as a stepping stone to self-reflection and increased awareness - a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Sissel Eikeland Husebø, Inger Åse Reierson, Anette Hansen, Hilde Solli\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41077-024-00306-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The voice of the students should be engaged in simulation curriculum development. Involving the students in the development of debriefing strategies might result in a deeper understanding of learning. However, few studies have investigated the students' perspectives on debriefing strategies. The aim of the study was to explore nursing students' perspectives on the post-simulation debriefing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explorative, descriptive design with a qualitative approach was used. Data were collected in December 2017 and May 2018 through focus group interviews with undergraduate nursing students in Norway immediately after a 2-day high-fidelity simulation course in the second year of their Bachelor of Nursing degree. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two nursing students participated in the study. The data analysis identified two main categories. The category 'Facilitator as a catalyst for reflection' illustrated the facilitator's multifaceted and vital role in initiating and guiding the students' reflection process in the debriefing. The category 'A process towards increased awareness' encompasses the students' guided process of acquiring new insight into their professional development, and how they put parts together to see the wholeness in what was simulated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides knowledge to facilitators regarding nursing students' perspectives on facilitating reflection and learning during debriefing discussions. The facilitator's multifaceted role in guiding the students' reflections and their process of acquiring new insight into their professional development were identified as critical to learning during debriefing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in simulation (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320937/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in simulation (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00306-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00306-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在模拟课程开发过程中,应听取学生的意见。让学生参与制定汇报策略可能会加深对学习的理解。然而,很少有研究调查学生对汇报策略的看法。本研究旨在探讨护理专业学生对模拟后汇报的看法:采用探索性、描述性设计和定性方法。数据收集于2017年12月和2018年5月,在护理学士学位二年级为期2天的高保真模拟课程结束后,立即对挪威的护理本科生进行了焦点小组访谈。采用系统文本压缩法对数据进行了分析:32 名护理专业学生参与了研究。数据分析确定了两个主要类别。引导者是反思的催化剂 "这一类别说明了引导者在启动和引导学生在汇报中进行反思的过程中发挥了多方面的重要作用。提高意识的过程 "这一类别包含了学生在引导下对其专业发展获得新见解的过程,以及他们如何将各个部分组合在一起,从而看到模拟内容的整体性:本研究为主持人提供了有关护理专业学生在汇报讨论中促进反思和学习的观点的知识。研究发现,主持人在引导学生进行反思方面所起的多方面作用,以及他们对自己的专业发展获得新见解的过程,对汇报过程中的学习至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-simulation debriefing as a stepping stone to self-reflection and increased awareness - a qualitative study.

Background: The voice of the students should be engaged in simulation curriculum development. Involving the students in the development of debriefing strategies might result in a deeper understanding of learning. However, few studies have investigated the students' perspectives on debriefing strategies. The aim of the study was to explore nursing students' perspectives on the post-simulation debriefing.

Methods: An explorative, descriptive design with a qualitative approach was used. Data were collected in December 2017 and May 2018 through focus group interviews with undergraduate nursing students in Norway immediately after a 2-day high-fidelity simulation course in the second year of their Bachelor of Nursing degree. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation.

Results: Thirty-two nursing students participated in the study. The data analysis identified two main categories. The category 'Facilitator as a catalyst for reflection' illustrated the facilitator's multifaceted and vital role in initiating and guiding the students' reflection process in the debriefing. The category 'A process towards increased awareness' encompasses the students' guided process of acquiring new insight into their professional development, and how they put parts together to see the wholeness in what was simulated.

Conclusions: This study provides knowledge to facilitators regarding nursing students' perspectives on facilitating reflection and learning during debriefing discussions. The facilitator's multifaceted role in guiding the students' reflections and their process of acquiring new insight into their professional development were identified as critical to learning during debriefing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信