混合方法纵向研究:描述医科学生在在线和面对面团队学习课程中的参与度和感知学习效果的差异。

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2024-02-12 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.19535.2
Irene Cheng Jie Lee, Peiyan Wong
{"title":"混合方法纵向研究:描述医科学生在在线和面对面团队学习课程中的参与度和感知学习效果的差异。","authors":"Irene Cheng Jie Lee, Peiyan Wong","doi":"10.12688/mep.19535.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rapid transition to online delivery of medical curriculum has facilitated the continuation of medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whilst active learning approaches, including Team-Based Learning (TBL), are generally more supportive of the learner's needs during such transition, it remains elusive how different learning environments affect a learner's motivation, engagement, and perceived learning over a prolonged period. We leveraged on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and key learners' characteristics to explore the levels of student's engagement and perceived learning in two TBL learning environments, online and in-person, over an extended period. We hypothesize that students' self-reported perceptions of engagement and learning will be lower in online compared to in-person TBL classes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a mixed methods study with 49 preclinical graduate medical students completing the same questionnaire twice for each learning environment, online TBL and in-person TBL, over an eight-month period. Quantitative data were collected on learners' characteristics, basic psychological needs satisfaction, motivation, student's engagement and perceived learning. The final questionnaire also explored participants' perception on which learning environment better supported their learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that autonomy support, perceived competence and needs satisfaction, and perceived learning were higher in-person than online. Additionally, most learners felt that in-person TBL was better for learning, as the concepts of learning space and the community of practice were mediated by being in-person.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TBL, being an active instructional method, can maintain students' engagement because it supports many aspects of SDT constructs and perceived learning. However, online TBL is unable to fully support the students' needs and perceived learning. Hence, we strongly advocate for any in-person opportunities to be included in a course, as in-person classes best supports students' engagement and perceived learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"13 ","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed methods, longitudinal study: characterizing the differences in engagement and perceived learning of medical students in online and in-person team-based learning classes.\",\"authors\":\"Irene Cheng Jie Lee, Peiyan Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/mep.19535.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rapid transition to online delivery of medical curriculum has facilitated the continuation of medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whilst active learning approaches, including Team-Based Learning (TBL), are generally more supportive of the learner's needs during such transition, it remains elusive how different learning environments affect a learner's motivation, engagement, and perceived learning over a prolonged period. We leveraged on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and key learners' characteristics to explore the levels of student's engagement and perceived learning in two TBL learning environments, online and in-person, over an extended period. We hypothesize that students' self-reported perceptions of engagement and learning will be lower in online compared to in-person TBL classes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a mixed methods study with 49 preclinical graduate medical students completing the same questionnaire twice for each learning environment, online TBL and in-person TBL, over an eight-month period. Quantitative data were collected on learners' characteristics, basic psychological needs satisfaction, motivation, student's engagement and perceived learning. The final questionnaire also explored participants' perception on which learning environment better supported their learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that autonomy support, perceived competence and needs satisfaction, and perceived learning were higher in-person than online. Additionally, most learners felt that in-person TBL was better for learning, as the concepts of learning space and the community of practice were mediated by being in-person.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TBL, being an active instructional method, can maintain students' engagement because it supports many aspects of SDT constructs and perceived learning. However, online TBL is unable to fully support the students' needs and perceived learning. Hence, we strongly advocate for any in-person opportunities to be included in a course, as in-person classes best supports students' engagement and perceived learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320038/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19535.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19535.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,迅速过渡到在线提供医学课程促进了医学教育的继续。虽然包括团队学习(TBL)在内的主动式学习方法通常更能满足学习者在这种过渡时期的需求,但不同的学习环境如何影响学习者的学习动机、参与度以及对长期学习的感知仍是一个未知数。我们利用自我决定理论(SDT)和学习者的主要特征,探讨了学生在两种 TBL 学习环境(在线和面授)中的参与程度和长期学习感知。我们假设,与面授 TBL 课程相比,在线 TBL 课程中学生自我报告的参与度和学习感知会更低:这是一项混合方法研究,49 名临床前医学研究生在 8 个月的时间内,针对在线 TBL 和面对面 TBL 两种学习环境,两次填写相同的调查问卷。研究收集了关于学习者特征、基本心理需求满足度、学习动机、学生参与度和学习感知的定量数据。最后的调查问卷还探讨了学员对哪种学习环境能更好地支持其学习的看法:结果:我们发现,与在线学习相比,面授学习的自主性支持、能力感知、需求满足和学习感知更高。此外,大多数学习者认为面对面的 TBL 更有利于学习,因为学习空间和实践社区的概念是以面对面的方式为中介的:作为一种积极的教学方法,TBL 可以保持学生的参与度,因为它支持 SDT 构建和感知学习的许多方面。然而,在线 TBL 无法完全满足学生的需求和学习感知。因此,我们强烈建议在课程中加入任何面对面授课的机会,因为面对面授课最能支持学生的参与和感知学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A mixed methods, longitudinal study: characterizing the differences in engagement and perceived learning of medical students in online and in-person team-based learning classes.

Background: The rapid transition to online delivery of medical curriculum has facilitated the continuation of medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whilst active learning approaches, including Team-Based Learning (TBL), are generally more supportive of the learner's needs during such transition, it remains elusive how different learning environments affect a learner's motivation, engagement, and perceived learning over a prolonged period. We leveraged on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and key learners' characteristics to explore the levels of student's engagement and perceived learning in two TBL learning environments, online and in-person, over an extended period. We hypothesize that students' self-reported perceptions of engagement and learning will be lower in online compared to in-person TBL classes.

Methods: This is a mixed methods study with 49 preclinical graduate medical students completing the same questionnaire twice for each learning environment, online TBL and in-person TBL, over an eight-month period. Quantitative data were collected on learners' characteristics, basic psychological needs satisfaction, motivation, student's engagement and perceived learning. The final questionnaire also explored participants' perception on which learning environment better supported their learning.

Results: We found that autonomy support, perceived competence and needs satisfaction, and perceived learning were higher in-person than online. Additionally, most learners felt that in-person TBL was better for learning, as the concepts of learning space and the community of practice were mediated by being in-person.

Conclusions: TBL, being an active instructional method, can maintain students' engagement because it supports many aspects of SDT constructs and perceived learning. However, online TBL is unable to fully support the students' needs and perceived learning. Hence, we strongly advocate for any in-person opportunities to be included in a course, as in-person classes best supports students' engagement and perceived learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信