获取我们的?"女老板 "与护士报销模式的伦理。

IF 2.6 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Equity Pub Date : 2024-07-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/heq.2024.0059
Danisha Jenkins, Jennifer Cohen, Rae Walker, Patrick McMurray, Jess Dillard Wright
{"title":"获取我们的?\"女老板 \"与护士报销模式的伦理。","authors":"Danisha Jenkins, Jennifer Cohen, Rae Walker, Patrick McMurray, Jess Dillard Wright","doi":"10.1089/heq.2024.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This article politicizes a reimbursement model proposed by some professional nursing associations that aim to better align the price of nursing labor (nurses' pay) to the value of nursing and make nurses' contributions more visible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the concept of \"missing care,\" the critique reveals how professionalization directs attention to individual-level interactions between care seekers and practitioners while obscuring from view the harm inflicted by social institutions and structures constitutive of a capitalist political economy and the related carceral state.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Direct reimbursement models render practitioners complicit in the harms perpetrated and perpetuated by the health care industrial complex while professionalization processes are deployed to reduce cognitive dissonance (and moral injury) produced by combining harm with nursing's normative principles.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We describe and trace the complementary capitalist imperatives of extraction-based profit maximization and efficiency through the health care industrial complex to demonstrate how formative those imperatives are of the health care system, care-seekers' outcomes, nurses' experiences, nonconsensual modes of data collection, and surveillance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The naturalization of racial capitalism and the precarity and violence it entails foreclose the creation of ethical alternatives that prioritize well-being instead of the pursuit of profit that could bring the provision of and payment for care closer to the normative principles held by practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":36602,"journal":{"name":"Health Equity","volume":"8 1","pages":"480-492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Getting Ours? \\\"Girlbossing\\\" and the Ethics of Nurse Reimbursement Models.\",\"authors\":\"Danisha Jenkins, Jennifer Cohen, Rae Walker, Patrick McMurray, Jess Dillard Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/heq.2024.0059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This article politicizes a reimbursement model proposed by some professional nursing associations that aim to better align the price of nursing labor (nurses' pay) to the value of nursing and make nurses' contributions more visible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the concept of \\\"missing care,\\\" the critique reveals how professionalization directs attention to individual-level interactions between care seekers and practitioners while obscuring from view the harm inflicted by social institutions and structures constitutive of a capitalist political economy and the related carceral state.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Direct reimbursement models render practitioners complicit in the harms perpetrated and perpetuated by the health care industrial complex while professionalization processes are deployed to reduce cognitive dissonance (and moral injury) produced by combining harm with nursing's normative principles.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We describe and trace the complementary capitalist imperatives of extraction-based profit maximization and efficiency through the health care industrial complex to demonstrate how formative those imperatives are of the health care system, care-seekers' outcomes, nurses' experiences, nonconsensual modes of data collection, and surveillance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The naturalization of racial capitalism and the precarity and violence it entails foreclose the creation of ethical alternatives that prioritize well-being instead of the pursuit of profit that could bring the provision of and payment for care closer to the normative principles held by practitioners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Equity\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"480-492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319852/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Equity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2024.0059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2024.0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本文将一些专业护理协会提出的报销模式政治化,该模式旨在使护理劳动的价格(护士的薪酬)与护理的价值更加一致,并使护士的贡献更加明显:方法:使用 "缺失的护理 "这一概念,批判揭示了专业化如何将人们的注意力引向护理寻求者与从业者之间的个人层面的互动,同时掩盖了构成资本主义政治经济和相关囚禁状态的社会机构和结构所造成的伤害:直接报销模式使从业人员成为医疗保健工业综合体所造成和延续的伤害的同谋,而专业化进程的部署则是为了减少将伤害与护理规范性原则相结合所产生的认知失调(和道德伤害):讨论:我们通过医疗保健产业综合体描述并追溯了以榨取为基础的利润最大化和效率的资本主义互补性要求,以证明这些要求对医疗保健系统、寻求护理者的结果、护士的经历、非自愿的数据收集模式和监控是如何形成的:结论:种族资本主义的自然化及其带来的不稳定性和暴力阻碍了伦理替代方案的产生,这些方案将福祉放在首位,而不是追求利润,从而使医疗服务的提供和支付更接近从业者所持的规范性原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Getting Ours? "Girlbossing" and the Ethics of Nurse Reimbursement Models.

Introduction: This article politicizes a reimbursement model proposed by some professional nursing associations that aim to better align the price of nursing labor (nurses' pay) to the value of nursing and make nurses' contributions more visible.

Methods: Using the concept of "missing care," the critique reveals how professionalization directs attention to individual-level interactions between care seekers and practitioners while obscuring from view the harm inflicted by social institutions and structures constitutive of a capitalist political economy and the related carceral state.

Results: Direct reimbursement models render practitioners complicit in the harms perpetrated and perpetuated by the health care industrial complex while professionalization processes are deployed to reduce cognitive dissonance (and moral injury) produced by combining harm with nursing's normative principles.

Discussion: We describe and trace the complementary capitalist imperatives of extraction-based profit maximization and efficiency through the health care industrial complex to demonstrate how formative those imperatives are of the health care system, care-seekers' outcomes, nurses' experiences, nonconsensual modes of data collection, and surveillance.

Conclusion: The naturalization of racial capitalism and the precarity and violence it entails foreclose the creation of ethical alternatives that prioritize well-being instead of the pursuit of profit that could bring the provision of and payment for care closer to the normative principles held by practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Equity
Health Equity Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信