髓内钉固定术后阿片类药物使用障碍患者围手术期疼痛控制的挑战。

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
William Curtis, Eric Kruger, Damian Fountain, Tyler Chavez, Gehron Treme
{"title":"髓内钉固定术后阿片类药物使用障碍患者围手术期疼痛控制的挑战。","authors":"William Curtis, Eric Kruger, Damian Fountain, Tyler Chavez, Gehron Treme","doi":"10.1177/17504589241262891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcomes of patients with opioid use disorder undergoing elective procedures have been well studied, but research is lacking in the orthopaedic trauma population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim was to compare perioperative pain and morphine equivalents required by patients with versus without opioid use disorder following intramedullary nail fixation of femoral or tibial fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with isolated femoral or tibial diaphyseal fractures treated with intramedullary nail fixation. Outcomes were compared between patients with diagnosed opioid use disorder and controls without, including daily morphine equivalents and patient-reported pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with opioid use disorder (n = 42) required greater morphine equivalents and reported higher pain than controls (n = 42) at all time points but did not differ in change of morphine equivalents over the perioperative period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This highlights the challenge of perioperative pain control in this population and need for improved specific pain management protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges of perioperative pain control in opioid use disorder patients following intramedullary nail fixation.\",\"authors\":\"William Curtis, Eric Kruger, Damian Fountain, Tyler Chavez, Gehron Treme\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17504589241262891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcomes of patients with opioid use disorder undergoing elective procedures have been well studied, but research is lacking in the orthopaedic trauma population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim was to compare perioperative pain and morphine equivalents required by patients with versus without opioid use disorder following intramedullary nail fixation of femoral or tibial fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with isolated femoral or tibial diaphyseal fractures treated with intramedullary nail fixation. Outcomes were compared between patients with diagnosed opioid use disorder and controls without, including daily morphine equivalents and patient-reported pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with opioid use disorder (n = 42) required greater morphine equivalents and reported higher pain than controls (n = 42) at all time points but did not differ in change of morphine equivalents over the perioperative period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This highlights the challenge of perioperative pain control in this population and need for improved specific pain management protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241262891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241262891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:本研究旨在比较股骨或胫骨骨折髓内钉固定术后有阿片类药物使用障碍与无阿片类药物使用障碍患者的围手术期疼痛和吗啡当量需求:我们对所有接受髓内钉固定治疗的孤立性股骨或胫骨骺端骨折患者进行了回顾性研究。比较了确诊有阿片类药物使用障碍的患者和无阿片类药物使用障碍的对照组的治疗结果,包括每日吗啡当量和患者报告的疼痛评分:有阿片类药物使用障碍的患者(42 人)在所有时间点上都比对照组(42 人)需要更多的吗啡当量并报告更高的疼痛,但在围手术期吗啡当量的变化上没有差异:结论:这突显了围手术期疼痛控制在这一人群中面临的挑战,以及改进特定疼痛管理方案的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges of perioperative pain control in opioid use disorder patients following intramedullary nail fixation.

Background: Outcomes of patients with opioid use disorder undergoing elective procedures have been well studied, but research is lacking in the orthopaedic trauma population.

Aim: The aim was to compare perioperative pain and morphine equivalents required by patients with versus without opioid use disorder following intramedullary nail fixation of femoral or tibial fractures.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with isolated femoral or tibial diaphyseal fractures treated with intramedullary nail fixation. Outcomes were compared between patients with diagnosed opioid use disorder and controls without, including daily morphine equivalents and patient-reported pain scores.

Results: Patients with opioid use disorder (n = 42) required greater morphine equivalents and reported higher pain than controls (n = 42) at all time points but did not differ in change of morphine equivalents over the perioperative period.

Conclusion: This highlights the challenge of perioperative pain control in this population and need for improved specific pain management protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信