超声引导下锁骨上阻滞与比尔阻滞用于上肢损伤急诊减压:统计分析计划。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08395-0
Philip Jones, Henry Tsao, Peter Snelling
{"title":"超声引导下锁骨上阻滞与比尔阻滞用于上肢损伤急诊减压:统计分析计划。","authors":"Philip Jones, Henry Tsao, Peter Snelling","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08395-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (UGSCB) is an emerging technique gaining interest amongst emergency physicians that provides regional anaesthesia to the upper limb to tolerate painful procedures. It offers an alternative to the more traditional technique of a Bier block (BB). However, the effectiveness or safety of UGSCB when performed in the emergency department (ED) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SUPERB (SUPraclavicular block for Emergency Reduction versus Bier block) is a prospective open-label non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of UGSCB versus BB for closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations. Adult patients presenting with upper limb fracture and/or dislocation requiring closed reduction in ED were randomised to either UGSCB or BB. Once regional anaesthesia is obtained, closed reduction of the injured part was performed and immobilised. The primary outcome is maximal pain experienced during closed reduction measured via a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include post-reduction pain, patient satisfaction, total opioid requirement in ED, ED length of stay, adverse events and regional anaesthesia failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary outcome analysis will be performed using both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The between-group difference in maximum pain intensity will be assessed using linear regression modelling with trial group allocation (UGSCB vs BB) included as a main affect. A pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 20 mm on the VAS scale will be used to establish non-inferiority of UGSCB compared to BB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SUPERB is the first randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness and safety of UGSCB in the ED. The trial has the potential to demonstrate that UGSCB is an alternative safe and effective option for the management of upper extremity emergencies in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: statistical analysis plan.\",\"authors\":\"Philip Jones, Henry Tsao, Peter Snelling\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-024-08395-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (UGSCB) is an emerging technique gaining interest amongst emergency physicians that provides regional anaesthesia to the upper limb to tolerate painful procedures. It offers an alternative to the more traditional technique of a Bier block (BB). However, the effectiveness or safety of UGSCB when performed in the emergency department (ED) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SUPERB (SUPraclavicular block for Emergency Reduction versus Bier block) is a prospective open-label non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of UGSCB versus BB for closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations. Adult patients presenting with upper limb fracture and/or dislocation requiring closed reduction in ED were randomised to either UGSCB or BB. Once regional anaesthesia is obtained, closed reduction of the injured part was performed and immobilised. The primary outcome is maximal pain experienced during closed reduction measured via a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include post-reduction pain, patient satisfaction, total opioid requirement in ED, ED length of stay, adverse events and regional anaesthesia failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary outcome analysis will be performed using both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The between-group difference in maximum pain intensity will be assessed using linear regression modelling with trial group allocation (UGSCB vs BB) included as a main affect. A pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 20 mm on the VAS scale will be used to establish non-inferiority of UGSCB compared to BB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SUPERB is the first randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness and safety of UGSCB in the ED. The trial has the potential to demonstrate that UGSCB is an alternative safe and effective option for the management of upper extremity emergencies in the ED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08395-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08395-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超声引导下锁骨上阻滞(UGSCB)是一种新兴技术,越来越受到急诊医生的关注,它能对上肢进行区域麻醉,以忍受疼痛的手术。它是比尔阻滞(BB)这一传统技术的替代方案。然而,在急诊科(ED)进行 UGSCB 的有效性或安全性尚不清楚:SUPERB(用于急诊复位的锁骨上阻滞与比尔阻滞)是一项前瞻性开放标签非劣效性随机对照试验,比较了锁骨上阻滞与比尔阻滞在上肢骨折和/或脱位闭合复位中的有效性。在急诊室就诊的上肢骨折和/或脱臼需要闭合复位的成人患者被随机分配到 UGSCB 或 BB。在进行区域麻醉后,对受伤部位进行闭合复位并固定。主要结果是通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量闭合复位过程中的最大疼痛。次要结果包括还原后疼痛、患者满意度、急诊室阿片类药物总需求、急诊室住院时间、不良事件和区域麻醉失败:主要结果分析将采用意向治疗和按协议治疗两种方法。将使用线性回归模型评估最大疼痛强度的组间差异,并将试验组分配(UGSCB 与 BB)作为主要影响因素。VAS量表上20毫米的预设非劣效边距将用于确定UGSCB与BB相比的非劣效性:SUPERB 是首个研究急诊室 UGSCB 有效性和安全性的随机对照试验。该试验有望证明 UGSCB 是急诊室处理上肢急症的另一种安全有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: statistical analysis plan.

Background: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (UGSCB) is an emerging technique gaining interest amongst emergency physicians that provides regional anaesthesia to the upper limb to tolerate painful procedures. It offers an alternative to the more traditional technique of a Bier block (BB). However, the effectiveness or safety of UGSCB when performed in the emergency department (ED) is unclear.

Methods: SUPERB (SUPraclavicular block for Emergency Reduction versus Bier block) is a prospective open-label non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of UGSCB versus BB for closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations. Adult patients presenting with upper limb fracture and/or dislocation requiring closed reduction in ED were randomised to either UGSCB or BB. Once regional anaesthesia is obtained, closed reduction of the injured part was performed and immobilised. The primary outcome is maximal pain experienced during closed reduction measured via a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include post-reduction pain, patient satisfaction, total opioid requirement in ED, ED length of stay, adverse events and regional anaesthesia failure.

Results: Primary outcome analysis will be performed using both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The between-group difference in maximum pain intensity will be assessed using linear regression modelling with trial group allocation (UGSCB vs BB) included as a main affect. A pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 20 mm on the VAS scale will be used to establish non-inferiority of UGSCB compared to BB.

Conclusion: SUPERB is the first randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness and safety of UGSCB in the ED. The trial has the potential to demonstrate that UGSCB is an alternative safe and effective option for the management of upper extremity emergencies in the ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信